When stripping, we shouldn't return on STT_GNU_IFUNC symbols. OK to
install?
Thanks.
H.J.
---
bfd/
2009-11-08 H.J. Lu <
hongjiu.lu@...>
PR ld/10911
* elflink.c (elf_link_output_extsym): Don't return on
STT_GNU_IFUNC symbol when stripping.
ld/testsuite/
2009-11-08 H.J. Lu <
hongjiu.lu@...>
PR ld/10911
* ld-ifunc/ifunc-4a-x86.d: New.
diff --git a/bfd/elflink.c b/bfd/elflink.c
index cd016b7..0153411 100644
--- a/bfd/elflink.c
+++ b/bfd/elflink.c
@@ -8639,9 +8639,11 @@ elf_link_output_extsym (struct elf_link_hash_entry *h, void *data)
strip = FALSE;
/* If we're stripping it, and it's not a dynamic symbol, there's
- nothing else to do unless it is a forced local symbol. */
+ nothing else to do unless it is a forced local symbol or a
+ STT_GNU_IFUNC symbol. */
if (strip
&& h->dynindx == -1
+ && h->type != STT_GNU_IFUNC
&& !h->forced_local)
return TRUE;
diff --git a/ld/testsuite/ld-ifunc/ifunc-4a-x86.d b/ld/testsuite/ld-ifunc/ifunc-4a-x86.d
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..d06f589
--- /dev/null
+++ b/ld/testsuite/ld-ifunc/ifunc-4a-x86.d
@@ -0,0 +1,8 @@
+#ld: -s
+#readelf: -r --wide
+#target: x86_64-*-* i?86-*-*
+#source: ifunc-4-x86.s
+
+#...
+[0-9a-f]+[ ]+[0-9a-f]+[ ]+R_[_0-9A-Z]+_IRELATIVE[ ]*[0-9a-f]*
+#pass
