No, I think your first patch had it right.
Jeff
On Wed, 2008-01-16 at 20:54 +0100, Philip Van Hoof wrote:
> On Wed, 2008-01-16 at 20:17 +0100, Philip Van Hoof wrote:
> > Please review
>
> Hmm the patch might not be right as the check is != 0 in stead of == 0.
>
> Anyway, the problem here is that local_charset can be NULL and that the
> strcmp would assert() on the first parameter being NULL.
>
>
_______________________________________________
Evolution-patches mailing list
Evolution-patches@...
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-patches