|
View:
New views
3 Messages
—
Rating Filter:
Alert me
|
|
|
PDNS performance comparison to BINDHello, I have tested PDNS performance (configuration below). A zone transfer of 100 000 records takes ~ 10 s using either MySQL or file backends. However Bind can make it in ~ 1 s (file-stored records). I have read the pdns manual chap.9 and tested the distributor-threads, cache-ttl and query-cache-ttl settings without a change in the performance. How can the performance be improved? Thank you for suggestions, Jan Configuration: - Fedora Core 9 - MySQL 5.0.77 - PDNS 2.9.22, compiled with gcc version 4.2.4 - DiG 9.5.0-P2 - pdns.conf: defaults + launch=gmysql gmysql-host=127.0.0.1 gmysql-user=kelb gmysql-password=xxxx gmysql-dbname=npdb negquery-cache-ttl=600 query-cache-ttl=600 wildcards=no -- Ing. Jan Rudinsky R&D Centre (RDC) for Mobile Applications Czech Technical University in Prague Cesnet z.s.p.o. rudinsj@... http://www.linkedin.com/in/rudinsky _______________________________________________ Pdns-users mailing list Pdns-users@... http://mailman.powerdns.com/mailman/listinfo/pdns-users |
|
|
Re: PDNS performance comparison to BINDOn Tue, Jun 23, 2009 at 2:05 AM, Jan Rudinsky<rudinsj@...> wrote:
> > Hello, > I have tested PDNS performance (configuration below). A zone transfer of 100 > 000 records takes ~ 10 s using either MySQL or file backends. > However Bind can make it in ~ 1 s (file-stored records). Hi Jan, We've never really optimised the zone transfer performance of PowerDNS because it has not really been an important use case so far. Are you measuring an incoming zonetransfer? Our outgoing? It may very well be than an outgoing one is pretty slow. Is it important to you? We could change PowerDNS if needed. Bert _______________________________________________ Pdns-users mailing list Pdns-users@... http://mailman.powerdns.com/mailman/listinfo/pdns-users |
|
|
Re: PDNS performance comparison to BINDHello Bert, bert hubert wrote: > On Tue, Jun 23, 2009 at 2:05 AM, Jan Rudinsky<rudinsj@...> wrote: >> Hello, >> I have tested PDNS performance (configuration below). A zone transfer of 100 >> 000 records takes ~ 10 s using either MySQL or file backends. >> However Bind can make it in ~ 1 s (file-stored records). > > Hi Jan, > > We've never really optimised the zone transfer performance of PowerDNS > because it has not really been an important use case so far. > > Are you measuring an incoming zonetransfer? Our outgoing? > > It may very well be than an outgoing one is pretty slow. > Exactly. Pdns sends information sequentialy as received from database. It might be faster to collect all the information first, then send it. > Is it important to you? We could change PowerDNS if needed. > > Bert It's just an idea of a telecom system based on DNS ZT. If successful I believe pdns will get optimized. Thank you, Jan -- Ing. Jan Rudinsky R&D Centre (RDC) for Mobile Applications Czech Technical University in Prague Cesnet z.s.p.o. rudinsj@... http://www.linkedin.com/in/rudinsky _______________________________________________ Pdns-users mailing list Pdns-users@... http://mailman.powerdns.com/mailman/listinfo/pdns-users |
| Free embeddable forum powered by Nabble | Forum Help |