
Some parts of this message have been removed.
Learn more about Nabble's
security policy.
Dear Friends,
Is this group still active? There were no replies to
my previous message, and I suppose there are some spam messages in the list for
August 2009. And nobody cares.
It is rather strange.
Anyway, in the Internet I have found a very
interesting comparison of three main formats: PNG, GIF and JPG. The pros and
cons of every format will help you to choose your own solution.
GIF format:
-
256 indexed
colors only. This is not very good for photographs
-
Animations
(multiple images per file). These are often called “Animated GIF”.
-
One color can be
defined as transparent (no alpha channel)
-
Lossless
compression (well suited for screen shots and editing)
PNG
format:
-
24 or 48 bit
truecolor (256 indexed colors, too)
-
No animations
(only one image per file)
-
Alpha channel for
transparency (much more flexible than single color transparency)
-
Lossless
compression (well suited for screen shots and editing, but larger files than
JPG)
JPG
format:
-
24 truecolor
-
No animations
(only one image per file)
-
No transparency
-
Lossy compression
(small files but not suitable for screen shots or editing)
The
comparison was provided by Helge Klein. To read the whole article, please visit
http://blogs.sepago.de/helge/2009/08/25/which-image-file-format-gifpngjpg-to-choose-a-consultants-answer/
Regards,
Sally
Catlett
Astra Design Company
sally@... http://www.astra-design.com