POSTAGE Re: Too Big to Block?

[Bart Schaefer-2]

Incidentally, the POSTAGE draft expired a couple of weeks ago.  Is it
worth re-issuing?  Anything new to say?

I've been following the threads spawned by Claudio Telmon's draft and
its intersection with some of the other threads; it appears to me that
there is some potential overlap with the POSTAGE draft.  For example,
Claudio's consent-token header is very similar to a proposal I made for
the "tunneling" of postage tokens through forwarding MTAs that don't
support the protocol at the SMTP level.  That was left out of POSTAGE
in the interests of simplicity.
_______________________________________________
Asrg mailing list
Asrg@...
http://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg

[Claudio Telmon]

Bart Schaefer wrote:

> For example,
> Claudio's consent-token header is very similar to a proposal I made for
> the "tunneling" of postage tokens through forwarding MTAs that don't
> support the protocol at the SMTP level.  That was left out of POSTAGE
> in the interests of simplicity.

Is it available somewhere?

Thanks

--

Claudio Telmon
claudio@...
http://www.telmon.org

_______________________________________________
Asrg mailing list
Asrg@...
http://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg