|
View:
New views
11 Messages
—
Rating Filter:
Alert me
|
|
|
Papaki Annotation Scanning RequirementsPlease edit the wiki page and add your annotation scanning requirements/usecases:
http://www.jboss.org/community/wiki/PapakiAnnotationScanningRequirements "Annotation scanning has a considerable impact in AS deployment and boot time performance. There are several subsystems that need to process annotations, for example EJB3, JCA, Web Services, JBoss Web, JPA, Seam, etc. and that often results either in inefficient annotation scanning implementations, extraneous classloading and multiple passes over the same jar files. The goal of the Papaki project (formerly JBoss Annotations) is to unify annotation scanning, so that it can be performed efficiently and in one pass, with the various subsystem pulling annotation information from the Papaki service, thus improving deployment and boot times. The purpose of this page is to collect requirements from all the projects that would be interested in plugging into this service, so that we can come up with a comprehensive API that can serve all the major use cases." _______________________________________________ jboss-development mailing list jboss-development@... https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jboss-development |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
Re: Papaki Annotation Scanning RequirementsOn 10/29/2009 02:39 PM, Dimitris Andreadis wrote:
> Please edit the wiki page and add your annotation scanning requirements/usecases: Well, the good news is, this is just what we need to get started. The bad news is by calling it "the Papaki project (formerly JBoss Annotations)", and asking people who would be interested in using this project, you're already leaking implementation considerations into a purely requirements doc. :-) What this document should really say is, "What projects need to read annotation data, scan annotations to determine deployment information, or in any other way use annotations at compile time OR run time, and what exactly are the requirements for each project?" And this should include ALL of our projects which do annotation scanning, not just projects which have a particular interest in the specific Papaki implementation (or any other implementation), otherwise we're going to miss out on some use-case data. - DML _______________________________________________ jboss-development mailing list jboss-development@... https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jboss-development |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
Re: Papaki Annotation Scanning RequirementsDavid, just tried to connect to the wiki and got a 502 error, so feel free to change the
wording, that was just a start to get the ball rolling ;-) David M. Lloyd wrote: > On 10/29/2009 02:39 PM, Dimitris Andreadis wrote: >> Please edit the wiki page and add your annotation scanning >> requirements/usecases: > > Well, the good news is, this is just what we need to get started. The > bad news is by calling it "the Papaki project (formerly JBoss > Annotations)", and asking people who would be interested in using this > project, you're already leaking implementation considerations into a > purely requirements doc. :-) > > What this document should really say is, "What projects need to read > annotation data, scan annotations to determine deployment information, > or in any other way use annotations at compile time OR run time, and > what exactly are the requirements for each project?" And this should > include ALL of our projects which do annotation scanning, not just > projects which have a particular interest in the specific Papaki > implementation (or any other implementation), otherwise we're going to > miss out on some use-case data. > > - DML jboss-development mailing list jboss-development@... https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jboss-development |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
Re: Papaki Annotation Scanning RequirementsI got a 503 error. I'm not sure if that is slightly better or worse
than a 502? :-) On 30 Oct 2009, at 08:42, Dimitris Andreadis wrote: > David, just tried to connect to the wiki and got a 502 error, so > feel free to change the > wording, that was just a start to get the ball rolling ;-) > > David M. Lloyd wrote: >> On 10/29/2009 02:39 PM, Dimitris Andreadis wrote: >>> Please edit the wiki page and add your annotation scanning >>> requirements/usecases: >> >> Well, the good news is, this is just what we need to get started. >> The >> bad news is by calling it "the Papaki project (formerly JBoss >> Annotations)", and asking people who would be interested in using >> this >> project, you're already leaking implementation considerations into a >> purely requirements doc. :-) >> >> What this document should really say is, "What projects need to read >> annotation data, scan annotations to determine deployment >> information, >> or in any other way use annotations at compile time OR run time, and >> what exactly are the requirements for each project?" And this should >> include ALL of our projects which do annotation scanning, not just >> projects which have a particular interest in the specific Papaki >> implementation (or any other implementation), otherwise we're going >> to >> miss out on some use-case data. >> >> - DML > _______________________________________________ > jboss-development mailing list > jboss-development@... > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jboss-development _______________________________________________ jboss-development mailing list jboss-development@... https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jboss-development |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
Re: Papaki Annotation Scanning RequirementsThere is a subtle difference between scanning & processing. What I don't want is unnecessary processing if a descriptor is metadata complete. Note that this only goes for EJB annotations, other annotation processing is left beyond scope. EJB 3.1-fr 20.5.2 .war Deployment Descriptor and Annotation Processing Table 26 describes the requirements for determining when to process annotations on the enterprise bean classes of a .war. If the .war contains an ejb-jar.xml file the deployment tool will process annotations unless the ejb-jar.xml has been marked metadata-complete. If the .war does not contain an ejb-jar.xml file, the deployment tool will process annotations unless the web.xml is marked metadata-complete or its version is prior to web-app_2_5. Table 26 .war Annotation Processing Requirements for enterprise beans
Carlo On 10/29/2009 08:39 PM, Dimitris Andreadis wrote: Please edit the wiki page and add your annotation scanning requirements/usecases: http://www.jboss.org/community/wiki/PapakiAnnotationScanningRequirements "Annotation scanning has a considerable impact in AS deployment and boot time performance. There are several subsystems that need to process annotations, for example EJB3, JCA, Web Services, JBoss Web, JPA, Seam, etc. and that often results either in inefficient annotation scanning implementations, extraneous classloading and multiple passes over the same jar files. The goal of the Papaki project (formerly JBoss Annotations) is to unify annotation scanning, so that it can be performed efficiently and in one pass, with the various subsystem pulling annotation information from the Papaki service, thus improving deployment and boot times. The purpose of this page is to collect requirements from all the projects that would be interested in plugging into this service, so that we can come up with a comprehensive API that can serve all the major use cases." _______________________________________________ jboss-development mailing list jboss-development@... https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jboss-development _______________________________________________ jboss-development mailing list jboss-development@... https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jboss-development |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
Re: Papaki Annotation Scanning RequirementsOn Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 2:59 PM, Carlo de Wolf <cdewolf@...> wrote:
> > I haven't worded it yet for a definitive requirement. > > There is a subtle difference between scanning & processing. What I don't want is unnecessary processing if a descriptor is metadata complete. > Note that this only goes for EJB annotations, other annotation processing is left beyond scope. You may want things all you like, but it's not going to happen. Metadata complete was changed in EE 6, and it's a lot less complete than it was. The bottom line is if you use JSR 299, then the easiest by far is to do scanning as before. Actually, I think it's the only thing that is doable. Rémy _______________________________________________ jboss-development mailing list jboss-development@... https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jboss-development |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
Re: Papaki Annotation Scanning RequirementsOn 11/11/2009 05:18 PM, Rémy Maucherat wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 2:59 PM, Carlo de Wolf<cdewolf@...> wrote: > >> I haven't worded it yet for a definitive requirement. >> >> There is a subtle difference between scanning& processing. What I don't want is unnecessary processing if a descriptor is metadata complete. >> Note that this only goes for EJB annotations, other annotation processing is left beyond scope. >> > You may want things all you like, but it's not going to happen. > Metadata complete was changed in EE 6, and it's a lot less complete > than it was. The bottom line is if you use JSR 299, then the easiest > by far is to do scanning as before. Actually, I think it's the only > thing that is doable. > > Rémy > > processing should become something optional. Carlo _______________________________________________ jboss-development mailing list jboss-development@... https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jboss-development |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
Re: Papaki Annotation Scanning RequirementsRémy Maucherat wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 2:59 PM, Carlo de Wolf <cdewolf@...> wrote: >> I haven't worded it yet for a definitive requirement. >> >> There is a subtle difference between scanning & processing. What I don't want is unnecessary processing if a descriptor is metadata complete. >> Note that this only goes for EJB annotations, other annotation processing is left beyond scope. > > You may want things all you like, but it's not going to happen. > Metadata complete was changed in EE 6, and it's a lot less complete > than it was. The bottom line is if you use JSR 299, then the easiest > by far is to do scanning as before. Actually, I think it's the only > thing that is doable. This, however, only happens when you have a beans.xml. If there is no beans.xml, then 299 does no scanning. -- Jason T. Greene JBoss, a division of Red Hat _______________________________________________ jboss-development mailing list jboss-development@... https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jboss-development |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
Re: Papaki Annotation Scanning RequirementsOn Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 5:37 PM, Jason T. Greene
<jason.greene@...> wrote: > This, however, only happens when you have a beans.xml. If there is no > beans.xml, then 299 does no scanning. Are you sure ? In Servlet 3.0, the language to skip resource injection in some cases is about managed beans (greatly expanded in JSR 299), not if a particular object is enabled in JSR 299 (or whatever the spec defines). So I would prefer scanning and processing annotations all the time. On Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 5:33 PM, Carlo de Wolf <cdewolf@...> wrote: > Right, so we should always scan and index all annotations. The actual > processing should become something optional. Ah ok. Rémy _______________________________________________ jboss-development mailing list jboss-development@... https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jboss-development |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
Re: Papaki Annotation Scanning RequirementsRémy Maucherat wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 5:37 PM, Jason T. Greene > <jason.greene@...> wrote: >> This, however, only happens when you have a beans.xml. If there is no >> beans.xml, then 299 does no scanning. > > Are you sure ? In Servlet 3.0, the language to skip resource injection > in some cases is about managed beans (greatly expanded in JSR 299), > not if a particular object is enabled in JSR 299 (or whatever the spec > defines). So I would prefer scanning and processing annotations all > the time. If there is no beans.xml, then no 299 specific types are searched for (299 style managed beans, stereotypes, decorators, etc) in the deployment. Servlets and EJBs in a deployment without a beans.xml can still use injection; however, only beans which are in a deployment that does contain a beans.xml are injectable (and such deployments must be "visible" [in the classpath via ear, web-inf/lib, etc]). There is one exception which is @New, which just creates a new instance per injection point, and that can be resolved lazily. Stated differently, if there is no beans.xml, then only reflective analysis of the EE component being instantiated need be done. This is basically the same rules as EE injection. So if metadata-complete is true in the ejb or war case, and there is no beans.xml, then no searching needs to be done. Reflection will still need to be done on each class specified in the descriptor. -- Jason T. Greene JBoss, a division of Red Hat _______________________________________________ jboss-development mailing list jboss-development@... https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jboss-development |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
Re: Papaki Annotation Scanning RequirementsOn Thu, Nov 12, 2009 at 10:47 PM, Jason T. Greene
<jason.greene@...> wrote: > If there is no beans.xml, then no 299 specific types are searched for > (299 style managed beans, stereotypes, decorators, etc) in the deployment. Ok. It would be easier, I think, to scan everything anyway. I did not mention it in the requirements yet, but can Papaki implement the ServletContainerInitializer requirements ? I thought scanning for types would be the exception rather the norm, but it is the opposite actually :( The first thing the JSF 2 devs did is use a HandlesTypes, so basically we have to scan everything, and if we aim at a single scan strategy, then meeting the SCI requirements is needed. I've added HandlesTypes to the wiki page ... Rémy _______________________________________________ jboss-development mailing list jboss-development@... https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jboss-development |
| Free embeddable forum powered by Nabble | Forum Help |