Please review changes to integrate JavaMail 1.4.3-rc1

View: New views
7 Messages — Rating Filter:   Alert me  

Please review changes to integrate JavaMail 1.4.3-rc1

by Nitya Doraisamy :: Rate this Message:

Reply to Author | View Threaded | Show Only this Message

Please review and approve the following changes to integrate JavaMail
1.4.3-rc1 and remove redundant OSGi repackaging

Thanks
Nitya


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@...
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@...

javamail_changes.diff (22K) Download Attachment

Re: Please review changes to integrate JavaMail 1.4.3-rc1

by Jane Young-Lau :: Rate this Message:

Reply to Author | View Threaded | Show Only this Message

Comments:

In javaee-api/javax.javaee/pom.xml, web/web-naming/pom.xml,
common/container-common/pom.xml remove  
<version>${mail.version}</version>  since you have it defined in
dependencyManagement in v3/pom.xml

Remove  javaee-api/javax.mail directory (svn delete ...)

How does javax.mail:mail:1.4.3-rc1 artifact gets bundled in packager ?  
If by Maven transitive dependency then which package?

Thanks,
Jane


Nitya Doraisamy wrote:
> Please review and approve the following changes to integrate JavaMail
> 1.4.3-rc1 and remove redundant OSGi repackaging
>
> Thanks
> Nitya


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@...
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@...


Re: Please review changes to integrate JavaMail 1.4.3-rc1

by Nitya Doraisamy :: Rate this Message:

Reply to Author | View Threaded | Show Only this Message

Jane
   Thanks for the comments. I made the suggested changes. Removed
<version>${mail.version}</version> from javaee-api/javax.javaee/pom.xml,
web/web-naming/pom.xml, common/container-common/pom.xml.
Attached updated diff.

The javax.mail:mail:1.4.3-rc1 artifact gets bundled via the
'container-common' package maven transitive dependency.

Nitya

Jane Young wrote:

> Comments:
>
> In javaee-api/javax.javaee/pom.xml, web/web-naming/pom.xml,
> common/container-common/pom.xml remove  
> <version>${mail.version}</version>  since you have it defined in
> dependencyManagement in v3/pom.xml
>
> Remove  javaee-api/javax.mail directory (svn delete ...)
>
> How does javax.mail:mail:1.4.3-rc1 artifact gets bundled in packager
> ?  If by Maven transitive dependency then which package?
>
> Thanks,
> Jane
>
>
> Nitya Doraisamy wrote:
>> Please review and approve the following changes to integrate JavaMail
>> 1.4.3-rc1 and remove redundant OSGi repackaging
>>
>> Thanks
>> Nitya
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@...
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@...
>



---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@...
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@...

javamail_changes.diff (18K) Download Attachment

Re: Please review changes to integrate JavaMail 1.4.3-rc1

by Sahoo :: Rate this Message:

Reply to Author | View Threaded | Show Only this Message

Nithya,

1. <version>${mail.version}</version> still apears in some places. e.g.,
javaee-api/javax.javaee/compact/pom.xml. Why?

2. I see mail version hardcoded in javadoc.xml. Why can't it use
${mail.version}? Ask Jane to see if she can help you avoiding this
duplication.

3. You are removing javaee-api/javax.mail directory completely, right?

Thanks,
Sahoo

Nitya Doraisamy wrote:

> Jane
>   Thanks for the comments. I made the suggested changes. Removed
> <version>${mail.version}</version> from
> javaee-api/javax.javaee/pom.xml, web/web-naming/pom.xml,
> common/container-common/pom.xml.
> Attached updated diff.
>
> The javax.mail:mail:1.4.3-rc1 artifact gets bundled via the
> 'container-common' package maven transitive dependency.
>
> Nitya
>
> Jane Young wrote:
>> Comments:
>>
>> In javaee-api/javax.javaee/pom.xml, web/web-naming/pom.xml,
>> common/container-common/pom.xml remove  
>> <version>${mail.version}</version>  since you have it defined in
>> dependencyManagement in v3/pom.xml
>>
>> Remove  javaee-api/javax.mail directory (svn delete ...)
>>
>> How does javax.mail:mail:1.4.3-rc1 artifact gets bundled in packager
>> ?  If by Maven transitive dependency then which package?
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Jane
>>
>>
>> Nitya Doraisamy wrote:
>>> Please review and approve the following changes to integrate
>>> JavaMail 1.4.3-rc1 and remove redundant OSGi repackaging
>>>
>>> Thanks
>>> Nitya
>>
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@...
>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@...
>>
>
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@...
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@...


Re: Please review changes to integrate JavaMail 1.4.3-rc1

by Nitya Doraisamy :: Rate this Message:

Reply to Author | View Threaded | Show Only this Message

Inline,
Sahoo wrote:
> Nithya,
>
> 1. <version>${mail.version}</version> still apears in some places.
> e.g., javaee-api/javax.javaee/compact/pom.xml. Why?
   I had missed the ${mail.version} in
javaee-api/javax.javaee/compact/pom.xml in my original pass. It's been
removed now.
>
> 2. I see mail version hardcoded in javadoc.xml. Why can't it use
> ${mail.version}? Ask Jane to see if she can help you avoiding this
> duplication.
The javadoc.xml does not inherit properties defined in the v3/pom.xml  I
will talk to Jane regarding reducing this duplication. Looking at the
javadoc.xml, this seems to apply to most of the modules there.
>
> 3. You are removing javaee-api/javax.mail directory completely, right?
Yes.

I also noticed a replaced a reference to javax.mail.jar with mail.jar in
v3/extras/javaee/manifest-jar/src/main/resources/META-INF/MANIFEST.MF

Attached the diff file. The build & QL passed.

- Nitya

>
> Thanks,
> Sahoo
>
> Nitya Doraisamy wrote:
>> Jane
>>   Thanks for the comments. I made the suggested changes. Removed
>> <version>${mail.version}</version> from
>> javaee-api/javax.javaee/pom.xml, web/web-naming/pom.xml,
>> common/container-common/pom.xml.
>> Attached updated diff.
>>
>> The javax.mail:mail:1.4.3-rc1 artifact gets bundled via the
>> 'container-common' package maven transitive dependency.
>>
>> Nitya
>>
>> Jane Young wrote:
>>> Comments:
>>>
>>> In javaee-api/javax.javaee/pom.xml, web/web-naming/pom.xml,
>>> common/container-common/pom.xml remove  
>>> <version>${mail.version}</version>  since you have it defined in
>>> dependencyManagement in v3/pom.xml
>>>
>>> Remove  javaee-api/javax.mail directory (svn delete ...)
>>>
>>> How does javax.mail:mail:1.4.3-rc1 artifact gets bundled in packager
>>> ?  If by Maven transitive dependency then which package?
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Jane
>>>
>>>
>>> Nitya Doraisamy wrote:
>>>> Please review and approve the following changes to integrate
>>>> JavaMail 1.4.3-rc1 and remove redundant OSGi repackaging
>>>>
>>>> Thanks
>>>> Nitya
>>>
>>>
>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@...
>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@...
>>>
>>
>>


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@...
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@...

javamail_changes.diff (20K) Download Attachment

Re: Please review changes to integrate JavaMail 1.4.3-rc1

by Sahoo :: Rate this Message:

Reply to Author | View Threaded | Show Only this Message

Nitya,

For the javadoc issue (described below), please file a bug and assign it
to Jane. Since rest of the changes look good, please commit them.

Thanks,
Sahoo

Nitya Doraisamy wrote:
>>
>> 2. I see mail version hardcoded in javadoc.xml. Why can't it use
>> ${mail.version}? Ask Jane to see if she can help you avoiding this
>> duplication.
> The javadoc.xml does not inherit properties defined in the v3/pom.xml  
> I will talk to Jane regarding reducing this duplication. Looking at
> the javadoc.xml, this seems to apply to most of the modules there.

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@...
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@...


Re: Please review changes to integrate JavaMail 1.4.3-rc1

by Jane Young-Lau :: Rate this Message:

Reply to Author | View Threaded | Show Only this Message

Yes, please file a bug for  javadoc.xml.  I will take care of it.

Thanks,
Jane


Sahoo wrote:

> Nitya,
>
> For the javadoc issue (described below), please file a bug and assign
> it to Jane. Since rest of the changes look good, please commit them.
>
> Thanks,
> Sahoo
>
> Nitya Doraisamy wrote:
>>>
>>> 2. I see mail version hardcoded in javadoc.xml. Why can't it use
>>> ${mail.version}? Ask Jane to see if she can help you avoiding this
>>> duplication.
>> The javadoc.xml does not inherit properties defined in the
>> v3/pom.xml  I will talk to Jane regarding reducing this duplication.
>> Looking at the javadoc.xml, this seems to apply to most of the
>> modules there.
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@...
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@...
>


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@...
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@...