Possible web-configuration framework

[Luis.F.Correia]

Hi all,

the subject of working webconf has surfaced from time to time.

While we do have a good-enough solution with webconf in bering uclibc, this
would also be fun to look at.

http://luci.freifunk-halle.net/News


Apparently it is also used (or is planned) in OpenWRT.

To your appreciation.

Luis Correia


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Open Source Business Conference (OSBC), March 24-25, 2009, San Francisco, CA
-OSBC tackles the biggest issue in open source: Open Sourcing the Enterprise
-Strategies to boost innovation and cut costs with open source participation
-Receive a $600 discount off the registration fee with the source code: SFAD
http://p.sf.net/sfu/XcvMzF8H

_______________________________________________
leaf-devel mailing list
leaf-devel@...
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-devel

[Erich Titl]

Luis

Luis.F.Correia wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> the subject of working webconf has surfaced from time to time.
>
> While we do have a good-enough solution with webconf in bering uclibc, this
> would also be fun to look at.

It definitely is worth a look, I disagree though, the current webconf
can be enhanced and I worked on a few little things myself which are
just a first step in the direction of what could be done with the
existing framework.

I have no experience with lua, haserl has its limits, but can do a lot
without adding a new interpreter.

All I can say is

"web programmers wanted for a web interface on Bering"

As soon as I am back ashore..., now sitting aboard a sailing yacht in
the Bahamas, I will sacrifice a little energy on moving the web
interface further.

Things I am missing are mostly web interfaces for

IPSEC
OPENVPN
NETWORKING/WIFI

cheers

Erich


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Open Source Business Conference (OSBC), March 24-25, 2009, San Francisco, CA
-OSBC tackles the biggest issue in open source: Open Sourcing the Enterprise
-Strategies to boost innovation and cut costs with open source participation
-Receive a $600 discount off the registration fee with the source code: SFAD
http://p.sf.net/sfu/XcvMzF8H

_______________________________________________
leaf-devel mailing list
leaf-devel@...
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-devel

[Mike Noyes-2]

On Mon, 2009-03-09 at 23:18 +0100, Erich Titl wrote:

> Luis
> Luis.F.Correia wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > the subject of working webconf has surfaced from time to time.
> >
> > While we do have a good-enough solution with webconf in bering uclibc, this
> > would also be fun to look at.
>
> It definitely is worth a look, I disagree though, the current webconf
> can be enhanced and I worked on a few little things myself which are
> just a first step in the direction of what could be done with the
> existing framework.
>
> I have no experience with lua, haserl has its limits, but can do a lot
> without adding a new interpreter.
>
> All I can say is
>
> "web programmers wanted for a web interface on Bering"

Erich,
Would you like us to advertise help wanted?

https://sourceforge.net/people/?group_id=13751

> As soon as I am back ashore..., now sitting aboard a sailing yacht in
> the Bahamas, I will sacrifice a little energy on moving the web
> interface further.
>
> Things I am missing are mostly web interfaces for
>
> IPSEC
> OPENVPN
> NETWORKING/WIFI
>
> cheers
>
> Erich

--
Mike Noyes <mhnoyes at users.sourceforge.net>
http://sourceforge.net/users/mhnoyes/
SF.net Projects:  leaf, sitedocs


------------------------------------------------------------------------------

_______________________________________________
leaf-devel mailing list
leaf-devel@...
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-devel

[Erich Titl]

Hi Folks

can anyone give me a hint on how to upgrade my current buildenv to the
actual version. I tried to find the config for the current kernel
without much luck. Where is the CVS for the buildenv so I can make an
update?

Thanks

Erich


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Stay on top of everything new and different, both inside and
around Java (TM) technology - register by April 22, and save
$200 on the JavaOne (SM) conference, June 2-5, 2009, San Francisco.
300 plus technical and hands-on sessions. Register today.
Use priority code J9JMT32. http://p.sf.net/sfu/p

_______________________________________________
leaf-devel mailing list
leaf-devel@...
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-devel

[KP Kirchdoerfer-2]

Am Mittwoch, 22. April 2009 11:04:15 schrieb Erich Titl:
> Hi Folks
>
> can anyone give me a hint on how to upgrade my current buildenv to the
> actual version. I tried to find the config for the current kernel
> without much luck. Where is the CVS for the buildenv so I can make an
> update?

Hi Erich;

There is no other kernel config than the one in apps/linux.

Rebuilding the buildenv from cvs should give you the latest version.
Do you see any errors?

kp

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Stay on top of everything new and different, both inside and
around Java (TM) technology - register by April 22, and save
$200 on the JavaOne (SM) conference, June 2-5, 2009, San Francisco.
300 plus technical and hands-on sessions. Register today.
Use priority code J9JMT32. http://p.sf.net/sfu/p

_______________________________________________
leaf-devel mailing list
leaf-devel@...
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-devel

[Erich Titl]

Hi Folks

Mike Noyes wrote:
> On Mon, 2009-03-09 at 23:18 +0100, Erich Titl wrote:
....

>
> Erich,
> Would you like us to advertise help wanted?
>
> https://sourceforge.net/people/?group_id=13751
>
>
>> As soon as I am back ashore..., now sitting aboard a sailing yacht in
>> the Bahamas, I will sacrifice a little energy on moving the web
>> interface further.

I fiddled a bit with the interfaces.cgi script for ifaces.lwp and added
a first version of ipsec.lwp to CVS

Mind you, ipsec.lwp _requires_ a recent version of haserl, as it allows
multiple file uploads. This may break the behaviour of at least
pppoe.cgi which has the unneeded -u parameter in its command line.

cheers

Erich

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Crystal Reports - New Free Runtime and 30 Day Trial
Check out the new simplified licensing option that enables unlimited
royalty-free distribution of the report engine for externally facing
server and web deployment.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/businessobjects

_______________________________________________
leaf-devel mailing list
leaf-devel@...
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-devel

[Erich Titl]

Hi folks

I found a strange behaviour in apkg -o which is a bug IMHO.

If a package foodle has an empty foodle.local file in /var/lib/lrpkg
then apkg -o produces enourmous output because the find command in

for a in $(find $(cat $PKGDIR/$pkg.local) -type f 2>/dev/null);

iterates over just about anything in the file system. We should make
sure the package.local files are not empty.

cheers

Erich

------------------------------------------------------------------------------

_______________________________________________
leaf-devel mailing list
leaf-devel@...
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-devel

[Erich Titl]

Hello

There was a bit of a thread some time ago concerning upgrading ipsec on
Bering uClibc. I believe the time has come to do so.

The problem shows up if on one side of a connection pair we leave pfs
undefined and on the other side pfs=no. Then pluto crashes and gets
restarted, just to crash at the next connection attempt from the badly
configured peer.

In my ipsec webconf it happens that I add parameters to the
configuration which were missing before, so I never observed the
problem. The default for at least the pfs parameter appears to be wrong
in the ipsec webconf page, but this can be fixed easily.

My openswan version right now is 2.4.7 which is, as far as the CVS
repository tells, the latest and greatest version (at OpenSwan the
current release of the 2.x branch is 2.6.22). The problem depicted here
is a known bug in 2.4.7 :-)

It so happens that there is a kernel patch for ipsec
(openswan-2.4.7.kernel-2.4-klips.patch), which might just be the content
of the openswanx.x.x/linux directory, but I am missing some information
on how this patch was built.

cheers

Erich


------------------------------------------------------------------------------

_______________________________________________
leaf-devel mailing list
leaf-devel@...
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-devel

[Erich Titl]

Hi Folks

A bit of a follow up:

As noone really seemed to bother, I went on to see what was required to
get to a current OpenSwan release. I built modules and userland for
OpenSwan 2.4.1§5 for the kernels 2.4.34 and 2.4.34.6 and at least they
did not crash when invoked.

cheers

Erich


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Enter the BlackBerry Developer Challenge  
This is your chance to win up to $100,000 in prizes! For a limited time,
vendors submitting new applications to BlackBerry App World(TM) will have
the opportunity to enter the BlackBerry Developer Challenge. See full prize  
details at: http://p.sf.net/sfu/Challenge

_______________________________________________
leaf-devel mailing list
leaf-devel@...
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-devel

[KP Kirchdoerfer-2]

Am Donnerstag, 9. Juli 2009 01:08:06 schrieb Erich Titl:
> Hi Folks
>
> A bit of a follow up:
>
> As noone really seemed to bother, I went on to see what was required to
> get to a current OpenSwan release. I built modules and userland for
> OpenSwan 2.4.1§5 for the kernels 2.4.34 and 2.4.34.6 and at least they
> did not crash when invoked.

Hi Erich;

can you add the lrp (and sources) to the contrib section in cvs, so user s can
testdrive the new package?
We can then replace the current 2.4.7 package, if it proofs to be stable.
I guess a lot of users (and I'm talking of developers as users here as well)
have moved from openswan to openvpn, which fit most of the needs without the
hassle to set up - at least I did.  This may explain, why none seemed to
bother the weaknesses of the latest ipsec.lrp.

regards kp

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Let Crystal Reports handle the reporting - Free Crystal Reports 2008 30-Day
trial. Simplify your report design, integration and deployment - and focus on
what you do best, core application coding. Discover what's new with
Crystal Reports now.  http://p.sf.net/sfu/bobj-july

_______________________________________________
leaf-devel mailing list
leaf-devel@...
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-devel