Powered by logos
|
View:
New views
4 Messages
—
Rating Filter:
Alert me
|
 |
|
|
|
Re: Powered by logos
by CosmicPerl
::
Rate this Message:
NP Bamber wrote:
> These logos are a vast improvement in terms of professional look. But > I have some questions. Is the intention to settle on either the > "cgi-app" wording or the "titanium" wording? > Can one use the "titanium" wording even if one uses CGI::Application > but not Titanium? No idea. I was thinking people could choose... Marks input would be interesting... Lyle ##### CGI::Application community mailing list ################ ## ## ## To unsubscribe, or change your message delivery options, ## ## visit: http://www.erlbaum.net/mailman/listinfo/cgiapp ## ## ## ## Web archive: http://www.erlbaum.net/pipermail/cgiapp/ ## ## Wiki: http://cgiapp.erlbaum.net/ ## ## ## ################################################################ |
|
|
Re: Powered by logos
by Bugzilla from mark@summersault.com
::
Rate this Message:
On Thu, 03 Sep 2009 17:54:56 +0100
NP Bamber <np.bamber@...> wrote: > These logos are a vast improvement in terms of professional look. But I > have some questions. Is the intention to settle on either the "cgi-app" > wording or the "titanium" wording? Technically, Titanium is a superset of CGI::Application plus some plugins. Titanium as a word seems far better in terms of marketing and branding, though. It would be possible to create an alias for the name CGI::Application in the Titanium name space,like "Titanium::Base", but don't take that as a formal suggestion. Titanium is just one vision of what can be built on top of CGI::Application. Someone else could easily combine their own combination of CGI::Application and different favorite plugins, and publish that with a different name. "Titanium::Base" and CGI::Application could both exist on CPAN and mean the same thing in terms of the code they represent. The aliasing would more clearly allow the word "Titanium" to represent projects that are based on CGI::Application, but not necessarily Titanium. The reason to do that would be if CGI::Application users would like the possibility using the Titanium name, logo and branding to represent CGI::Application-based projects not built on the full "Titanium" stack. Mark ##### CGI::Application community mailing list ################ ## ## ## To unsubscribe, or change your message delivery options, ## ## visit: http://www.erlbaum.net/mailman/listinfo/cgiapp ## ## ## ## Web archive: http://www.erlbaum.net/pipermail/cgiapp/ ## ## Wiki: http://cgiapp.erlbaum.net/ ## ## ## ################################################################ |
|
|
Re: Re: Powered by logos
by Bill Stephenson
::
Rate this Message:
On Sep 3, 2009, at 3:12 PM, Mark Stosberg wrote:
> On Thu, 03 Sep 2009 17:54:56 +0100 > NP Bamber <np.bamber@...> wrote: > >> These logos are a vast improvement in terms of professional look. But >> I >> have some questions. Is the intention to settle on either the >> "cgi-app" >> wording or the "titanium" wording? > While I'm just a lurker here I thought I'd pass along the name "A-Frame" to be kicked around. This name thing may have been settled long ago, I dunno, but the name just came to me and a quick google search didn't show much related. Kindest Regards, -- Bill Stephenson ezInvoice.com ##### CGI::Application community mailing list ################ ## ## ## To unsubscribe, or change your message delivery options, ## ## visit: http://www.erlbaum.net/mailman/listinfo/cgiapp ## ## ## ## Web archive: http://www.erlbaum.net/pipermail/cgiapp/ ## ## Wiki: http://cgiapp.erlbaum.net/ ## ## ## ################################################################ |
| Free embeddable forum powered by Nabble | Forum Help |
