Problems building binutils 2.19

[rr-10]

Hi!

I was updating my tool chain and starting with the binutils 2.19.

Following the avr-libc manual, I downloaded binutils 2.19, unziped it,
applied the following patches from the winavr SVN repositories:

30-binutils-2.19-avr-size.patch
31-binutils-2.19-avr-coff.patch
32-binutils-2.19-new-sections.patch
33-binutils-2.19-data-origin.patch
40-binutils-2.19-wrong-arch.patch
50-binutils-2.19-xmega.patch
51-binutils-2.19-xmega2.patch
52-binutils-2.19-atmega32u6.patch

using the command:

mypc:~/binutils-2.19> patch -p0 < 30-binutils-2.19-avr-size.patch

and so on.
Then:

mypc:~/binutils-2.19> md obj-avr
mypc:~/binutils-2.19> cd obj-avr
mypc:~/binutils-2.19> ../configure --prefix=/usr/local/AVR --target=avr
--disable-nls
mypc:~/binutils-2.19> make

And then I got these errors:
/bin/sh ./libtool --tag=CC --mode=compile gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I.
-I../../bfd -I. -I. -I../../bfd -I../../bfd/../include     -W -Wall
-Wstrict-prototypes -Wmissing-prototypes -Werror -g -O2 -c -o
elf32-avr.lo ../../bfd/elf32-avr.c
libtool: compile:  gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I../../bfd -I. -I.
-I../../bfd -I../../bfd/../include -W -Wall -Wstrict-prototypes
-Wmissing-prototypes -Werror -g -O2 -c ../../bfd/elf32-avr.c -o elf32-avr.o
../../bfd/elf32-avr.c: In function 'bfd_elf_avr_final_write_processing':
../../bfd/elf32-avr.c:1331: error: 'bfd_mach_avrxmega1' undeclared
(first use in this function)
../../bfd/elf32-avr.c:1331: error: (Each undeclared identifier is
reported only once
../../bfd/elf32-avr.c:1331: error: for each function it appears in.)
../../bfd/elf32-avr.c:1335: error: 'bfd_mach_avrxmega2' undeclared
(first use in this function)
../../bfd/elf32-avr.c:1339: error: 'bfd_mach_avrxmega3' undeclared
(first use in this function)
../../bfd/elf32-avr.c:1343: error: 'bfd_mach_avrxmega4' undeclared
(first use in this function)
../../bfd/elf32-avr.c:1347: error: 'bfd_mach_avrxmega5' undeclared
(first use in this function)
../../bfd/elf32-avr.c:1351: error: 'bfd_mach_avrxmega6' undeclared
(first use in this function)
../../bfd/elf32-avr.c:1355: error: 'bfd_mach_avrxmega7' undeclared
(first use in this function)
../../bfd/elf32-avr.c: In function 'elf32_avr_object_p':
../../bfd/elf32-avr.c:1422: error: 'bfd_mach_avrxmega1' undeclared
(first use in this function)
../../bfd/elf32-avr.c:1426: error: 'bfd_mach_avrxmega2' undeclared
(first use in this function)
../../bfd/elf32-avr.c:1430: error: 'bfd_mach_avrxmega3' undeclared
(first use in this function)
../../bfd/elf32-avr.c:1434: error: 'bfd_mach_avrxmega4' undeclared
(first use in this function)
../../bfd/elf32-avr.c:1438: error: 'bfd_mach_avrxmega5' undeclared
(first use in this function)
../../bfd/elf32-avr.c:1442: error: 'bfd_mach_avrxmega6' undeclared
(first use in this function)
../../bfd/elf32-avr.c:1446: error: 'bfd_mach_avrxmega7' undeclared
(first use in this function)
make[4]: *** [elf32-avr.lo] Error 1


I assume I'm doing something wrong, as I found no one else reporting
this problem, so I would like to know what am I doing wrong.

Thanks!


_______________________________________________
AVR-libc-dev mailing list
AVR-libc-dev@...
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/avr-libc-dev

[Joerg Wunsch]

As rr wrote:

> ../../bfd/elf32-avr.c: In function 'bfd_elf_avr_final_write_processing':
> ../../bfd/elf32-avr.c:1331: error: 'bfd_mach_avrxmega1' undeclared
> (first use in this function)

One of Eric's patch patches a file that is then to be used as a master
to generate some other files from.  You have to regenerate those
dependant files by running the bootstrap script again (which in turn
will run the autoconf/automake tools).

If you don't like this, you could alternatively use the patches from
the FreeBSD port of avr-binutils (as it's e.g. done in Bingo600's
Linux toolchain buildscript on avrfreaks.net).  The respective patch
there does not only patch the master but also the respective generated
files.

--
cheers, J"org               .-.-.   --... ...--   -.. .  DL8DTL

http://www.sax.de/~joerg/                        NIC: JW11-RIPE
Never trust an operating system you don't have sources for. ;-)


_______________________________________________
AVR-libc-dev mailing list
AVR-libc-dev@...
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/avr-libc-dev

[Weddington, Eric]

 

> -----Original Message-----
> From:
> avr-libc-dev-bounces+eric.weddington=atmel.com@...
> [mailto:avr-libc-dev-bounces+eric.weddington=atmel.com@nongnu.
> org] On Behalf Of Joerg Wunsch
> Sent: Tuesday, August 18, 2009 5:08 AM
> To: avr-libc-dev@...
> Subject: Re: [avr-libc-dev] Problems building binutils 2.19
>
> As rr wrote:
>
> > ../../bfd/elf32-avr.c: In function
> 'bfd_elf_avr_final_write_processing':
> > ../../bfd/elf32-avr.c:1331: error: 'bfd_mach_avrxmega1' undeclared
> > (first use in this function)
>
> One of Eric's patch patches a file that is then to be used as a master
> to generate some other files from.  You have to regenerate those
> dependant files by running the bootstrap script again (which in turn
> will run the autoconf/automake tools).
>
> If you don't like this, you could alternatively use the patches from
> the FreeBSD port of avr-binutils (as it's e.g. done in Bingo600's
> Linux toolchain buildscript on avrfreaks.net).  The respective patch
> there does not only patch the master but also the respective generated
> files.

And specifically, this is what I do in my build script after configuration:

make maybe-configure-bfd 2>&1 | tee $project-make-configure-bfd.log
make -C bfd headers 2>&1 | tee $project-make-headers.log
make all html install install-html 2>&1 | tee $project-make.log



_______________________________________________
AVR-libc-dev mailing list
AVR-libc-dev@...
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/avr-libc-dev

[rr-10]

Weddington, Eric wrote:

>  
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From:
>> avr-libc-dev-bounces+eric.weddington=atmel.com@...
>> [mailto:avr-libc-dev-bounces+eric.weddington=atmel.com@nongnu.
>> org] On Behalf Of Joerg Wunsch
>> Sent: Tuesday, August 18, 2009 5:08 AM
>> To: avr-libc-dev@...
>> Subject: Re: [avr-libc-dev] Problems building binutils 2.19
>>
>> As rr wrote:
>>
>>> ../../bfd/elf32-avr.c: In function
>> 'bfd_elf_avr_final_write_processing':
>>> ../../bfd/elf32-avr.c:1331: error: 'bfd_mach_avrxmega1' undeclared
>>> (first use in this function)
>> One of Eric's patch patches a file that is then to be used as a master
>> to generate some other files from.  You have to regenerate those
>> dependant files by running the bootstrap script again (which in turn
>> will run the autoconf/automake tools).

Joerg:

This is not the first time I build the AVR tool chain in Linux, and I
remember reading in some mailing list that both of you (Joerg and Eric)
had different patches for the tools, but the Eric's patches were more
complete than Joerg ones.

Question: Which patches should we use?


The patches found in
"http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/cvsweb.cgi/ports/devel/avr-binutils/files/"
have any special order to patch?
I am going to install binutils 2.19. Should I use 2.19.1 patches too?
If I'd install binutils 2.19.1, should I use 2.19 patches too?

>>
>> If you don't like this, you could alternatively use the patches from
>> the FreeBSD port of avr-binutils (as it's e.g. done in Bingo600's
>> Linux toolchain buildscript on avrfreaks.net).  The respective patch
>> there does not only patch the master but also the respective generated
>> files.
>
> And specifically, this is what I do in my build script after configuration:
>
> make maybe-configure-bfd 2>&1 | tee $project-make-configure-bfd.log
> make -C bfd headers 2>&1 | tee $project-make-headers.log
> make all html install install-html 2>&1 | tee $project-make.log

Eric:

Thanks! It worked ok now.
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> AVR-libc-dev mailing list
> AVR-libc-dev@...
> http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/avr-libc-dev
>



_______________________________________________
AVR-libc-dev mailing list
AVR-libc-dev@...
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/avr-libc-dev

[Weddington, Eric]

 

> -----Original Message-----
> From:
> avr-libc-dev-bounces+eric.weddington=atmel.com@...
> [mailto:avr-libc-dev-bounces+eric.weddington=atmel.com@nongnu.
> org] On Behalf Of rr
> Sent: Tuesday, August 18, 2009 9:06 AM
> To: avr-libc-dev@...
> Subject: Re: [avr-libc-dev] Problems building binutils 2.19
>
> Question: Which patches should we use?

In general, Joerg and I try to have an equivalent set of patches, though at times one or the other of us is off by a release. If one of us is off, then just let us know and we'll get the situation resolved.

 
>
> The patches found in
> "http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/cvsweb.cgi/ports/devel/avr-binutil
> s/files/"
> have any special order to patch?
> I am going to install binutils 2.19. Should I use 2.19.1 patches too?
> If I'd install binutils 2.19.1, should I use 2.19 patches too?

IIRC, 2.19.1 has one of the AVR specfici 2.19 patches committed. So if you use 2.19 + patches, then this should be equivalent to 2.19.1. There were not very many changes between 2.19 and 2.19.1 and IIRC, they were mostly port specific.



_______________________________________________
AVR-libc-dev mailing list
AVR-libc-dev@...
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/avr-libc-dev