Problems signing rpms

[Chris-394]

I'm building clamav rpm's for 2009.1 and am having an issue signing them
with my gpg key. Previously when I was running 10.1 I had no problems.
I'm using the below command:

[chris@localhost ~]$ rpmbuild
-bb--sign /home/chris/rpm/SPECS/clamav.spec
Enter pass phrase:
Pass phrase check failed

My ~/.rpmmacros file has all the same info as I used in building rpms
for 10.1:

%_topdir /home/chris/rpm
%_tmppath /home/chris/rpm/tmp

%_signature gpg
%_gpg_name Chris Pollock (New email address as of 04/21/07) <cpollock@...>
%_gpg_path ~/.gnupg
%distribution MandrivaLinux
%vendor Mandriva

And I've ensured that I entered my passphrase correctly. Any ideas as to what the
problem may be? There are no problems building without the sig and guess I could upload
them to the site I usually do unsigned however I'd feel better if they were.

Thanks
Chris


--
KeyID 0xE372A7DA98E6705C

[Thomas Backlund]

Chris skrev:

> I'm building clamav rpm's for 2009.1 and am having an issue signing them
> with my gpg key. Previously when I was running 10.1 I had no problems.
> I'm using the below command:
>
> [chris@localhost ~]$ rpmbuild
> -bb--sign /home/chris/rpm/SPECS/clamav.spec
> Enter pass phrase:
> Pass phrase check failed
>
> My ~/.rpmmacros file has all the same info as I used in building rpms
> for 10.1:
>
> %_topdir /home/chris/rpm
> %_tmppath /home/chris/rpm/tmp
>
> %_signature gpg
> %_gpg_name Chris Pollock (New email address as of 04/21/07) <cpollock@...>
> %_gpg_path ~/.gnupg
> %distribution MandrivaLinux
> %vendor Mandriva
>
> And I've ensured that I entered my passphrase correctly. Any ideas as to what the
> problem may be? There are no problems building without the sig and guess I could upload
> them to the site I usually do unsigned however I'd feel better if they were.
>

Does your %_gpg_name match whats in your gpg key ?
(matching uid in 'gpg -K' output)

Is your gpg keys correctly installed in ~/.gnupg ?

Is the permissions correct on the .gnupg files ?
(700 on directory, 600 on the files)

--
Thomas

[Charles A Edwards]

On Thu, 02 Jul 2009 17:57:31 -0500
Chris wrote:

> I'm building clamav rpm's for 2009.1 and am having an issue signing
> them with my gpg key. Previously when I was running 10.1 I had no
> problems. I'm using the below command:
>
> [chris@localhost ~]$ rpmbuild
> -bb--sign /home/chris/rpm/SPECS/clamav.spec
> Enter pass phrase:
> Pass phrase check failed
>
> My ~/.rpmmacros file has all the same info as I used in building rpms
> for 10.1:
>
> %_topdir /home/chris/rpm
> %_tmppath /home/chris/rpm/tmp
>
> %_signature gpg
> %_gpg_name Chris Pollock (New email address as of 04/21/07)
> <cpollock@...>

Your key was created for your earthlink address.

If you you wish to change it you will should rescind that key and
then create a "new" key for your embarqmail address.


    Charles

--
Having the fewest wants, I am nearest to the gods.
                -- Socrates
----------------------
Mandriva Linux release 2010.0 (Cooker) for x86_64$
On SuperSize....http://www.eslrahc.com
Registered Linux user #182463
2.6.30-server-2mnb AMD Athlon(tm) 64 X2 Dual Core Processor 6400+
----------------------

[Thomas Backlund]

Charles A Edwards skrev:

> On Thu, 02 Jul 2009 17:57:31 -0500
> Chris wrote:
>
>> I'm building clamav rpm's for 2009.1 and am having an issue signing
>> them with my gpg key. Previously when I was running 10.1 I had no
>> problems. I'm using the below command:
>>
>> [chris@localhost ~]$ rpmbuild
>> -bb--sign /home/chris/rpm/SPECS/clamav.spec
>> Enter pass phrase:
>> Pass phrase check failed
>>
>> My ~/.rpmmacros file has all the same info as I used in building rpms
>> for 10.1:
>>
>> %_topdir /home/chris/rpm
>> %_tmppath /home/chris/rpm/tmp
>>
>> %_signature gpg
>> %_gpg_name Chris Pollock (New email address as of 04/21/07)
>> <cpollock@...>
>
> Your key was created for your earthlink address.
>
> If you you wish to change it you will should rescind that key and
> then create a "new" key for your embarqmail address.
>

Or add the new e-mail address to the existing key...

--
Thomas

[Chris-394]

On Thu, 2009-07-02 at 19:18 -0400, Charles A Edwards wrote:

> On Thu, 02 Jul 2009 17:57:31 -0500
> Chris wrote:
>
> > I'm building clamav rpm's for 2009.1 and am having an issue signing
> > them with my gpg key. Previously when I was running 10.1 I had no
> > problems. I'm using the below command:
> >
> > [chris@localhost ~]$ rpmbuild
> > -bb--sign /home/chris/rpm/SPECS/clamav.spec
> > Enter pass phrase:
> > Pass phrase check failed
> >
> > My ~/.rpmmacros file has all the same info as I used in building rpms
> > for 10.1:
> >
> > %_topdir /home/chris/rpm
> > %_tmppath /home/chris/rpm/tmp
> >
> > %_signature gpg
> > %_gpg_name Chris Pollock (New email address as of 04/21/07)
> > <cpollock@...>
>
> Your key was created for your earthlink address.
>
> If you you wish to change it you will should rescind that key and
> then create a "new" key for your embarqmail address.
>
>
>     Charles[chris@localhost ~]$ gpg --list-public-keys

Thanks Charles but back in 2005 when the change from earthlink to embarq
was taking place I created another uid as you can see below
gpg: using PGP trust model
gpg: key 98E6705C: accepted as trusted key
/home/chris/.gnupg/pubring.gpg
------------------------------
pub   1024D/98E6705C 2005-11-23
uid                  Chris Pollock (New email address as of 04/21/07)
<cpollock@...>
uid                  Chris Pollock <cpollock@...>


Here's the output of rpm --checksig on a package I made in 2008 well
after I made the ISP change:

clamav-0.94-1.1.101mdk.i586.rpm: (sha1) dsa sha1 md5 gpg OK

This is the first packages I've tried to sign since I switched to 2009
so I'm a bit confused as to why it doesn't work

Chris

--
KeyID 0xE372A7DA98E6705C

[Chris-394]

On Fri, 2009-07-03 at 02:14 +0300, Thomas Backlund wrote:

> Chris skrev:
> > I'm building clamav rpm's for 2009.1 and am having an issue signing them
> > with my gpg key. Previously when I was running 10.1 I had no problems.
> > I'm using the below command:
> >
> > [chris@localhost ~]$ rpmbuild
> > -bb--sign /home/chris/rpm/SPECS/clamav.spec
> > Enter pass phrase:
> > Pass phrase check failed
> >
> > My ~/.rpmmacros file has all the same info as I used in building rpms
> > for 10.1:
> >
> > %_topdir /home/chris/rpm
> > %_tmppath /home/chris/rpm/tmp
> >
> > %_signature gpg
> > %_gpg_name Chris Pollock (New email address as of 04/21/07) <cpollock@...>
> > %_gpg_path ~/.gnupg
> > %distribution MandrivaLinux
> > %vendor Mandriva
> >
> > And I've ensured that I entered my passphrase correctly. Any ideas as to what the
> > problem may be? There are no problems building without the sig and guess I could upload
> > them to the site I usually do unsigned however I'd feel better if they were.
> >
>
>
> Does your %_gpg_name match whats in your gpg key ?
> (matching uid in 'gpg -K' output)

%_gpg_name Chris Pollock (New email address as of 04/21/07)

<cpollock@...>

[chris@localhost ~]$ gpg --list-keys
gpg: using PGP trust model
gpg: key 98E6705C: accepted as trusted key
/home/chris/.gnupg/pubring.gpg
------------------------------
pub   1024D/98E6705C 2005-11-23
uid                  Chris Pollock (New email address as of 04/21/07)
<cpollock@...>
uid                  Chris Pollock <cpollock@...>


> Is your gpg keys correctly installed in ~/.gnupg ?

As far as I know, I have no problem signing messages, wouldn't I if they
were incorrectly installed?
>
> Is the permissions correct on the .gnupg files ?
> (700 on directory, 600 on the files)
>
> --
> Thomas

drwx------   4 chris chris      4096 2009-07-02 21:17 .gnupg/
-rw-r--r-- 1 chris chris    2137 2009-01-02 20:24 cpollock.asc
drwx------ 2 chris chris    4096 2009-02-26 17:37 dirmngr-cache.d/
-rw-r--r-- 1 chris chris     321 2009-02-08 11:19 dirmngr.conf
-rw-r--r-- 1 chris chris     321 2009-02-08 11:06
dirmngr.conf.gpgconf.bak
-rw-r--r-- 1 chris chris     851 2009-07-01 10:42 gpg-agent.conf
-rw-r--r-- 1 chris chris     853 2009-02-08 11:19 gpg-agent.conf~
-rw-r--r-- 1 chris chris     853 2009-02-08 11:06
gpg-agent.conf.gpgconf.bak
-rw-r--r-- 1 chris chris    9289 2009-02-06 19:59 gpg.conf
-rw-r--r-- 1 chris chris    9178 2009-01-03 15:40 gpg.conf~
-rw-r--r-- 1 chris chris    9209 2009-01-02 20:21 gpg.conf.gpgconf.bak
-rw-r--r-- 1 chris chris     432 2009-02-08 11:19 gpgsm.conf
-rw-r--r-- 1 chris chris     422 2009-01-02 19:06 gpgsm.conf~
-rw-r--r-- 1 chris chris     432 2009-02-08 11:06 gpgsm.conf.gpgconf.bak
srwxrwxr-x 1 chris chris       0 2009-02-08 11:19 log-socket=
drwxrwxr-x 2 chris chris    4096 2009-01-03 22:18 private-keys-v1.d/
-rw------- 1 chris chris 6497756 2009-07-01 17:46 pubring.gpg
-rw------- 1 chris chris 6497756 2009-07-01 17:10 pubring.gpg~
-rw-rw-r-- 1 chris chris   17087 2009-02-26 17:37 pubring.kbx
-rw-rw-r-- 1 chris chris   18116 2009-02-26 17:37 pubring.kbx~
-rw------- 1 chris chris     600 2009-07-02 21:16 random_seed
-rw-r--r-- 1 chris chris     327 2009-02-08 11:19 scdaemon.conf
-rw-r--r-- 1 chris chris     327 2009-02-08 11:06
scdaemon.conf.gpgconf.bak
-rw------- 1 chris chris    1311 2009-01-07 17:37 secring.gpg
-rw------- 1 chris chris    1480 2009-07-01 17:46 trustdb.gpg

Does anything look amiss?

--
KeyID 0xE372A7DA98E6705C

[Thomas Backlund]

Chris skrev:

> On Fri, 2009-07-03 at 02:14 +0300, Thomas Backlund wrote:
>> Chris skrev:
>>> I'm building clamav rpm's for 2009.1 and am having an issue signing them
>>> with my gpg key. Previously when I was running 10.1 I had no problems.
>>> I'm using the below command:
>>>
>>> [chris@localhost ~]$ rpmbuild
>>> -bb--sign /home/chris/rpm/SPECS/clamav.spec
>>> Enter pass phrase:
>>> Pass phrase check failed
>>>
>>> My ~/.rpmmacros file has all the same info as I used in building rpms
>>> for 10.1:
>>>
>>> %_topdir /home/chris/rpm
>>> %_tmppath /home/chris/rpm/tmp
>>>
>>> %_signature gpg
>>> %_gpg_name Chris Pollock (New email address as of 04/21/07) <cpollock@...>
>>> %_gpg_path ~/.gnupg
>>> %distribution MandrivaLinux
>>> %vendor Mandriva
>>>
>>> And I've ensured that I entered my passphrase correctly. Any ideas as to what the
>>> problem may be? There are no problems building without the sig and guess I could upload
>>> them to the site I usually do unsigned however I'd feel better if they were.
>>>
>>
>> Does your %_gpg_name match whats in your gpg key ?
>> (matching uid in 'gpg -K' output)
> %_gpg_name Chris Pollock (New email address as of 04/21/07)
> <cpollock@...>
>
> [chris@localhost ~]$ gpg --list-keys
> gpg: using PGP trust model
> gpg: key 98E6705C: accepted as trusted key
> /home/chris/.gnupg/pubring.gpg
> ------------------------------
> pub   1024D/98E6705C 2005-11-23
> uid                  Chris Pollock (New email address as of 04/21/07)
> <cpollock@...>
> uid                  Chris Pollock <cpollock@...>
>
>
>> Is your gpg keys correctly installed in ~/.gnupg ?
>
> As far as I know, I have no problem signing messages, wouldn't I if they
> were incorrectly installed?
>> Is the permissions correct on the .gnupg files ?
>> (700 on directory, 600 on the files)
>>
>> --
>> Thomas
>
> drwx------   4 chris chris      4096 2009-07-02 21:17 .gnupg/
> -rw-r--r-- 1 chris chris    2137 2009-01-02 20:24 cpollock.asc
> drwx------ 2 chris chris    4096 2009-02-26 17:37 dirmngr-cache.d/
> -rw-r--r-- 1 chris chris     321 2009-02-08 11:19 dirmngr.conf
> -rw-r--r-- 1 chris chris     321 2009-02-08 11:06
> dirmngr.conf.gpgconf.bak
> -rw-r--r-- 1 chris chris     851 2009-07-01 10:42 gpg-agent.conf
> -rw-r--r-- 1 chris chris     853 2009-02-08 11:19 gpg-agent.conf~
> -rw-r--r-- 1 chris chris     853 2009-02-08 11:06
> gpg-agent.conf.gpgconf.bak
> -rw-r--r-- 1 chris chris    9289 2009-02-06 19:59 gpg.conf

Should be -rw-------

> -rw-r--r-- 1 chris chris    9178 2009-01-03 15:40 gpg.conf~
> -rw-r--r-- 1 chris chris    9209 2009-01-02 20:21 gpg.conf.gpgconf.bak
> -rw-r--r-- 1 chris chris     432 2009-02-08 11:19 gpgsm.conf
> -rw-r--r-- 1 chris chris     422 2009-01-02 19:06 gpgsm.conf~
> -rw-r--r-- 1 chris chris     432 2009-02-08 11:06 gpgsm.conf.gpgconf.bak
> srwxrwxr-x 1 chris chris       0 2009-02-08 11:19 log-socket=
> drwxrwxr-x 2 chris chris    4096 2009-01-03 22:18 private-keys-v1.d/

Should be drwx------

> -rw------- 1 chris chris 6497756 2009-07-01 17:46 pubring.gpg

OK

> -rw------- 1 chris chris 6497756 2009-07-01 17:10 pubring.gpg~
> -rw-rw-r-- 1 chris chris   17087 2009-02-26 17:37 pubring.kbx
> -rw-rw-r-- 1 chris chris   18116 2009-02-26 17:37 pubring.kbx~
> -rw------- 1 chris chris     600 2009-07-02 21:16 random_seed

OK

> -rw-r--r-- 1 chris chris     327 2009-02-08 11:19 scdaemon.conf
> -rw-r--r-- 1 chris chris     327 2009-02-08 11:06
> scdaemon.conf.gpgconf.bak
> -rw------- 1 chris chris    1311 2009-01-07 17:37 secring.gpg

OK

> -rw------- 1 chris chris    1480 2009-07-01 17:46 trustdb.gpg
>

OK

> Does anything look amiss?
>


What is the output of:
rpmbuild -bs -v --sign /home/chris/rpm/SPECS/clamav.spec

and:

rpm -qa '*rpm*' '*gnupg*'

--
Thomas

[Chris-394]

On Fri, 2009-07-03 at 13:02 +0300, Thomas Backlund wrote:

>
> > Does anything look amiss?
> >
>
>
> What is the output of:
> rpmbuild -bs -v --sign /home/chris/rpm/SPECS/clamav.spec

Hmm, there appears to be a problem here:

[chris@localhost ~]$ rpmbuild -bs -v
--sign /home/chris/rpm/SPECS/clamav.spec
Enter pass phrase:
gpg: skipped "Chris Pollock (New email address as of 04/21/07)
<cpollock@...>": secret key not available
gpg: signing failed: secret key not available
Pass phrase check failed
> and:
>
> rpm -qa '*rpm*' '*gnupg*'

[chris@localhost ~]$ rpm -qa '*rpm*' '*gnupg*'
urpmi-6.25.5-1mdv2009.1
gurpmi-6.25.5-1mdv2009.1
rpm-mandriva-setup-1.91-1mdv2009.1
rpmdrake-5.16.5-1.1mdv2009.1
librpm4.6-4.6.0-2.1mnb2
rpm-manbo-setup-build-2-16mnb2
rpmbuildupdate-0.8.1-3mdv2009.0
gnupg-1.4.9-8mdv2009.1
librpm-devel-4.6.0-2.1mnb2
rpm-4.6.0-2.1mnb2
rpm-helper-0.22.1-2mdv2009.1
rpm-manbo-setup-2-16mnb2
rpm-build-4.6.0-2.1mnb2
librpmconstant0-0.1.3-5mdv2009.1
rpm-mandriva-setup-build-1.91-1mdv2009.1

> --
> Thomas

Chris

--
KeyID 0xE372A7DA98E6705C

[Thomas Backlund]

Chris skrev:

> On Fri, 2009-07-03 at 13:02 +0300, Thomas Backlund wrote:
>
>>> Does anything look amiss?
>>>
>>
>> What is the output of:
>> rpmbuild -bs -v --sign /home/chris/rpm/SPECS/clamav.spec
>
> Hmm, there appears to be a problem here:
>
> [chris@localhost ~]$ rpmbuild -bs -v
> --sign /home/chris/rpm/SPECS/clamav.spec
> Enter pass phrase:
> gpg: skipped "Chris Pollock (New email address as of 04/21/07)
> <cpollock@...>": secret key not available
> gpg: signing failed: secret key not available
> Pass phrase check failed

Yep, there is your problem...

And you never responded to if the question if gpg sees the key with

gpg -K

>> and:
>>
>> rpm -qa '*rpm*' '*gnupg*'
>
> [chris@localhost ~]$ rpm -qa '*rpm*' '*gnupg*'

rpm list seems ok

--
Thomas

[Chris-394]

On Fri, 2009-07-03 at 16:27 +0300, Thomas Backlund wrote:

> Chris skrev:
> > On Fri, 2009-07-03 at 13:02 +0300, Thomas Backlund wrote:
> >
> >>> Does anything look amiss?
> >>>
> >>
> >> What is the output of:
> >> rpmbuild -bs -v --sign /home/chris/rpm/SPECS/clamav.spec
> >
> > Hmm, there appears to be a problem here:
> >
> > [chris@localhost ~]$ rpmbuild -bs -v
> > --sign /home/chris/rpm/SPECS/clamav.spec
> > Enter pass phrase:
> > gpg: skipped "Chris Pollock (New email address as of 04/21/07)
> > <cpollock@...>": secret key not available
> > gpg: signing failed: secret key not available
> > Pass phrase check failed
>
>
> Yep, there is your problem...
>
> And you never responded to if the question if gpg sees the key with
>
> gpg -K

Sorry, thought I did. Appears to be using the wrong uid

[chris@localhost ~]$ gpg -K
gpg: using character set `utf-8'
gpg: using PGP trust model
gpg: key 98E6705C: accepted as trusted key
/home/chris/.gnupg/secring.gpg
------------------------------
sec   1024D/98E6705C 2005-11-23
uid                  Chris Pollock <cpollock@...>
ssb   2048g/F5604046 2005-11-23

So now I'm really confused because --list-keys shows:

[chris@localhost ~]$ gpg --list-keys cpollock@...
gpg: using character set `utf-8'
gpg: using PGP trust model
gpg: key 98E6705C: accepted as trusted key
pub   1024D/98E6705C 2005-11-23
uid                  Chris Pollock (New email address as of 04/21/07)
<cpollock@...>
uid                  Chris Pollock <cpollock@...>
sub   2048g/F5604046 2005-11-23


--
KeyID 0xE372A7DA98E6705C

[Thomas Backlund]

Chris skrev:

> On Fri, 2009-07-03 at 16:27 +0300, Thomas Backlund wrote:
>> Chris skrev:
>>> On Fri, 2009-07-03 at 13:02 +0300, Thomas Backlund wrote:
>>>
>>>>> Does anything look amiss?
>>>>>
>>>> What is the output of:
>>>> rpmbuild -bs -v --sign /home/chris/rpm/SPECS/clamav.spec
>>> Hmm, there appears to be a problem here:
>>>
>>> [chris@localhost ~]$ rpmbuild -bs -v
>>> --sign /home/chris/rpm/SPECS/clamav.spec
>>> Enter pass phrase:
>>> gpg: skipped "Chris Pollock (New email address as of 04/21/07)
>>> <cpollock@...>": secret key not available
>>> gpg: signing failed: secret key not available
>>> Pass phrase check failed
>>
>> Yep, there is your problem...
>>
>> And you never responded to if the question if gpg sees the key with
>>
>> gpg -K
> Sorry, thought I did. Appears to be using the wrong uid
>
> [chris@localhost ~]$ gpg -K
> gpg: using character set `utf-8'
> gpg: using PGP trust model
> gpg: key 98E6705C: accepted as trusted key
> /home/chris/.gnupg/secring.gpg
> ------------------------------
> sec   1024D/98E6705C 2005-11-23
> uid                  Chris Pollock <cpollock@...>
> ssb   2048g/F5604046 2005-11-23
>
> So now I'm really confused because --list-keys shows:
>
> [chris@localhost ~]$ gpg --list-keys cpollock@...
> gpg: using character set `utf-8'
> gpg: using PGP trust model
> gpg: key 98E6705C: accepted as trusted key
> pub   1024D/98E6705C 2005-11-23
> uid                  Chris Pollock (New email address as of 04/21/07)
> <cpollock@...>
> uid                  Chris Pollock <cpollock@...>
> sub   2048g/F5604046 2005-11-23
>
>

Hmmm.
Looking on your filelist once again I see:
-rw------- 1 chris chris 6497756 2009-07-01 17:46 pubring.gpg
-rw------- 1 chris chris    1311 2009-01-07 17:37 secring.gpg
-rw------- 1 chris chris    1480 2009-07-01 17:46 trustdb.gpg

the secring  seems to be an older version...

Do you have backups of those files  ?
If so, try to check if the backups are correct.

If not, you have to add your new mail adress again...

--
Thomas

[Chris-394]

On Fri, 2009-07-03 at 17:25 +0300, Thomas Backlund wrote:

> > [chris@localhost ~]$ gpg -K
> > gpg: using character set `utf-8'
> > gpg: using PGP trust model
> > gpg: key 98E6705C: accepted as trusted key
> > /home/chris/.gnupg/secring.gpg
> > ------------------------------
> > sec   1024D/98E6705C 2005-11-23
> > uid                  Chris Pollock <cpollock@...>
> > ssb   2048g/F5604046 2005-11-23
> >
> > So now I'm really confused because --list-keys shows:
> >
> > [chris@localhost ~]$ gpg --list-keys cpollock@...
> > gpg: using character set `utf-8'
> > gpg: using PGP trust model
> > gpg: key 98E6705C: accepted as trusted key
> > pub   1024D/98E6705C 2005-11-23
> > uid                  Chris Pollock (New email address as of 04/21/07)
> > <cpollock@...>
> > uid                  Chris Pollock <cpollock@...>
> > sub   2048g/F5604046 2005-11-23
> >
> >
>
> Hmmm.
> Looking on your filelist once again I see:
> -rw------- 1 chris chris 6497756 2009-07-01 17:46 pubring.gpg
> -rw------- 1 chris chris    1311 2009-01-07 17:37 secring.gpg
> -rw------- 1 chris chris    1480 2009-07-01 17:46 trustdb.gpg
>
> the secring  seems to be an older version...
>
> Do you have backups of those files  ?
> If so, try to check if the backups are correct.
>
> If not, you have to add your new mail adress again...
>
> --
> Thomas
>
>

Thanks Thomas that was the problem.

[chris@localhost ~]$ gpg -K
gpg: using character set `utf-8'
gpg: using PGP trust model
gpg: key 98E6705C: accepted as trusted key
/home/chris/.gnupg/secring.gpg
------------------------------
sec   1024D/98E6705C 2005-11-23
uid                  Chris Pollock <cpollock@...>
uid                  Chris Pollock (New email address as of 04/21/07)
<cpollock@...>
ssb   2048g/F5604046 2005-11-23


I copied over the secring.gpg file that I made the same day I made the
new uid from a backup and rpmbuild is happily now making my signed rpms.

[chris@localhost i586]$ rpm -v --checksig
clamd-0.95.2-1mdv2009.1.i586.rpm
clamd-0.95.2-1mdv2009.1.i586.rpm:
    Header V4 DSA signature: OK, key ID 98e6705c
    Header SHA1 digest: OK (975c02d67357a42e5698b3050deadae945434be7)
    MD5 digest: OK (424750ca8fe413cfc997cb41683c99cb)
    V4 DSA signature: OK, key ID 98e6705c

Thanks for the assist it was much appreciated and I'm just glad I keep
backups.

Chris

--
KeyID 0xE372A7DA98E6705C