|
View:
New views
3 Messages
—
Rating Filter:
Alert me
|
|
|
Problems with M3 hasOne association - Anyone using it?Hello all,
I've just upgraded my application to Grails 1.2-M3 to use the hasOne association, but I'm having some problems. In a simple association, I have that 1 "Unidade" has 1 "UnidadeSiteData" instance and I want to have the fk stored in the child class as it is written here: http://grails.org/doc/latest/ref/Domain%20Classes/hasOne.html So, my child class is written like this: class UnidadeSiteData { Unidade unidade (... other fields) } and my parent class, it is referring it this way: class Unidade implements Taggable { (... other fields) static hasOne = [siteData:UnidadeSiteData] } But when I run the app, during the database update process, a column for this association is being created in the "Unidade" table, with a name "site_data_id" (WTF?) Why is this happening? Is someone using the hasOne association? I've tried to use the mappedBy closure to handle the association way but got the same problem. Thanks in advance. []s, Lucas Frare Teixeira .·. - lucastex@... - lucastex.com.br - blog.lucastex.com - twitter.com/lucastex |
|
|
Re: Problems with M3 hasOne association - Anyone using it?is anybody using hasOne successfully ?
[]s, Lucas Frare Teixeira .·. - lucastex@... - lucastex.com.br - blog.lucastex.com - twitter.com/lucastex On Thu, Nov 5, 2009 at 9:55 PM, Lucas F. A. Teixeira <lucastex@...> wrote: Hello all, |
|
|
Re: Re: Problems with M3 hasOne association - Anyone using it?Raise a JIRA with an example that reproduces the issue
Cheers On Fri, Nov 6, 2009 at 4:51 PM, Lucas F. A. Teixeira <lucastex@...> wrote: > is anybody using hasOne successfully ? > []s, > > Lucas Frare Teixeira .·. > - lucastex@... > - lucastex.com.br > - blog.lucastex.com > - twitter.com/lucastex > > > On Thu, Nov 5, 2009 at 9:55 PM, Lucas F. A. Teixeira <lucastex@...> > wrote: >> >> Hello all, >> >> I've just upgraded my application to Grails 1.2-M3 to use the hasOne >> association, but I'm having some problems. >> >> In a simple association, I have that 1 "Unidade" has 1 "UnidadeSiteData" >> instance and I want to have the fk stored in the child class as it is >> written here: http://grails.org/doc/latest/ref/Domain%20Classes/hasOne.html >> >> So, my child class is written like this: >> >> class UnidadeSiteData { >> >> Unidade unidade >> (... other fields) >> } >> >> and my parent class, it is referring it this way: >> >> class Unidade implements Taggable { >> >> (... other fields) >> static hasOne = [siteData:UnidadeSiteData] >> } >> >> But when I run the app, during the database update process, a column for >> this association is being created in the "Unidade" table, with a name >> "site_data_id" (WTF?) >> >> Why is this happening? Is someone using the hasOne association? >> >> I've tried to use the mappedBy closure to handle the association way but >> got the same problem. >> >> Thanks in advance. >> >> []s, >> >> Lucas Frare Teixeira .·. >> - lucastex@... >> - lucastex.com.br >> - blog.lucastex.com >> - twitter.com/lucastex > > -- Graeme Rocher Head of Grails Development SpringSource - A Division of VMware http://www.springsource.com --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe from this list, please visit: http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email |
| Free embeddable forum powered by Nabble | Forum Help |