|
View:
New views
5 Messages
—
Rating Filter:
Alert me
|
| < Prev | 1 - 2 - 3 | Next > |
|
|
Re: Python UK meeting and DjangoQuoting Kapil Thangavelu <kapil.foss@...>:
> On Thu, May 8, 2008 at 3:54 PM, Kevin Smith <kevin@...> wrote: > >> >> Noah Gift wrote: >> >> >>> They were successful due to brilliant marketing (kudos man), a >>> mostly-developed python answer to RoR, a good sense of timing and strong >>> community development skills. >> >> >> I agree, and if you doubt this truth, then read Four Hour Work Week. >> Anyone can create their own image, and expertise in weeks, but it requires >> tenacious and persistent marketing. They, or the entity, needs to write >> many articles, give talks, etc. Unfortunately, often the very smartest >> people suck the most at engaging in this type of necessary behavior. >> >> >>> >>> >>> Perhaps grok is being too nice. GROK SMASH YET ANOTHER ROR RIPOFF. >>> </rant> >>> >>> Of course a real advantage for DJango is that they are AppEngine ready. >>> Interestingly the Datastore is much more akin to the ZODB than it is to an >>> RDB. >> >> >> I have been playing with the Datastore and like it quite a bit. I would >> love to see a version of Grok that just uses the Datastore as option. I >> would really, really like Grok then. I know we have a "Global Sprint" >> coming at the end of May, and also some people that use Grok will be >> attending the Google I/O event. Anyone want to try...? >> >> >> Yup, I'm game. The 1,000 file limit is pretty tough. A did a basic test >> doing an install of ore.wsgiref, and ended up with 3000+ files without >> including zcml. >> >> My mini-strategy is to >> * get easy_install zope.component >> * get martian working >> * implement custom traversal >> * fork grok :) doh! >> >> After looking at the Datastore it may yet be possible to do object-based >> publishing by replacing persistence. I'll have to catch up with you at >> Google I/O. >> >> fwiw, i started playing around with trying get z3 onto gae, its a hard > issue, after fiddling away the proxies in zope.deferredmodule, there's still > pkg_resource fixes to get just a barebones zope.publisher.paste running, and > then there are issues with location.proxies.. you'll end up with a very > stripped down z3, with little resemblance to the standard stack just pure > object publishing, and thats not even including a templating engine, which > have proxies referenced in them. and of course the 1000 file limit is tough, > to work around you can try zip'd files but that kills existing zcml usage > and template usage. at that point i realized i was just reinventing what the > repoze guys have been doing.. and that for running a z3 like environment the > repoze stack (obob publisher, transaction) is likely to be quite a bit > easier to just run. > > cheers, > > kapil > Nice work. Off-hand do you think it would it be more feasible to port Zope2/Repoze/five.grok? _______________________________________________ Grok-dev mailing list Grok-dev@... http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/grok-dev |
|
|
Re: Python UK meeting and DjangoOn May 8, 2008, at 10:07 PM, Noah Gift wrote:
>> I have been playing with the Datastore and like it quite a bit. I >> would love to see a version of Grok that just uses the Datastore as >> option. I would really, really like Grok then. I know we have a >> "Global Sprint" coming at the end of May, and also some people that >> use Grok will be attending the Google I/O event. Anyone want to >> try...? > > Yup, I'm game. The 1,000 file limit is pretty tough. A did a basic > test doing an install of ore.wsgiref, and ended up with 3000+ files > without including zcml. > > My mini-strategy is to > * get easy_install zope.component > * get martian working > * implement custom traversal > * fork grok :) doh! > > After looking at the Datastore it may yet be possible to do object- > based publishing by replacing persistence. I'll have to catch up > with you at Google I/O. Isn't there a restriction about long running processes? Zope needs to run as a service or it will have to reregister all adapters/utilities on each request. How is this solved? /Tim _______________________________________________ Grok-dev mailing list Grok-dev@... http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/grok-dev |
|
|
Re: Python UK meeting and DjangoOn Fri, May 9, 2008 at 1:49 AM, Tim Terlegård <tim.terlegard@...> wrote:
Can Zope run under CGI? I like the idea of starting at the problem backwards and getting anything at all of any sort to run in whatever hackish way possible, and then slowly normalizing it.
_______________________________________________ Grok-dev mailing list Grok-dev@... http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/grok-dev |
|
|
Re: Python UK meeting and DjangoOn Fri, May 9, 2008 at 1:49 AM, Tim Terlegård <tim.terlegard@...> wrote:
via import caching, and finishing component loading/registration at a module global scope. cheers, kapil _______________________________________________ Grok-dev mailing list Grok-dev@... http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/grok-dev |
|
|
Re: Python UK meeting and DjangoOn Fri, May 9, 2008 at 5:07 AM, <kevin@...> wrote:
> Nice work. Off-hand do you think it would it be more feasible to port > Zope2/Repoze/five.grok? The bet strategy to get Zope2 running on google app engine is to first make Zope2 a Zope3 application, and then port Zope 3. :) -- Lennart Regebro: Zope and Plone consulting. http://www.colliberty.com/ +33 661 58 14 64 _______________________________________________ Grok-dev mailing list Grok-dev@... http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/grok-dev |
| < Prev | 1 - 2 - 3 | Next > |
| Free embeddable forum powered by Nabble | Forum Help |