|
View:
New views
20 Messages
—
Rating Filter:
Alert me
|
| < Prev | 1 - 2 | Next > |
|
|
Query Compexity in Design ModeWhy is the following query too complex to be viewed in the design mode?
SELECT `Date`, weekday( `Date` ) AS `Weekday`, `Precipitation` AS `Precip` FROM `kwbo4418_WaterlooWeather2000`.`2005` AS `2005` WHERE ( weekday( `Date` ) = '4' OR weekday( `Date` ) = '5' OR weekday( `Date` ) = '6' ) AND `Precipitation` > 0 --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@... For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@... |
|
|
Re: Query Compexity in Design ModeKeith Clark wrote:
> Why is the following query too complex to be viewed in the design mode? > > SELECT `Date`, weekday( `Date` ) AS `Weekday`, > `Precipitation` AS `Precip` > FROM `kwbo4418_WaterlooWeather2000`.`2005` AS `2005` > WHERE ( weekday( `Date` ) = '4' > OR weekday( `Date` ) = '5' > OR weekday( `Date` ) = '6' ) > AND `Precipitation` > 0 > > Without trying it - change the criteria to 4, 5 and 6 vs `4`, etc. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@... For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@... |
|
|
Re: Query Compexity in Design ModeOn Sat, 2009-08-08 at 19:07 -0400, Drew Jensen wrote:
> Keith Clark wrote: > > Why is the following query too complex to be viewed in the design mode? > > > > SELECT `Date`, weekday( `Date` ) AS `Weekday`, > > `Precipitation` AS `Precip` > > FROM `kwbo4418_WaterlooWeather2000`.`2005` AS `2005` > > WHERE ( weekday( `Date` ) = '4' > > OR weekday( `Date` ) = '5' > > OR weekday( `Date` ) = '6' ) > > AND `Precipitation` > 0 > > > > > > Without trying it - change the criteria to 4, 5 and 6 vs `4`, etc. > > Hmm, still says Query Too Complex. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@... For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@... |
|
|
Re: Query Compexity in Design ModeKeith Clark wrote:
> On Sat, 2009-08-08 at 19:07 -0400, Drew Jensen wrote: > >> Keith Clark wrote: >> >>> Why is the following query too complex to be viewed in the design mode? >>> >>> SELECT `Date`, weekday( `Date` ) AS `Weekday`, >>> `Precipitation` AS `Precip` >>> FROM `kwbo4418_WaterlooWeather2000`.`2005` AS `2005` >>> WHERE ( weekday( `Date` ) = '4' >>> OR weekday( `Date` ) = '5' >>> OR weekday( `Date` ) = '6' ) >>> AND `Precipitation` > 0 >>> >>> >>> >> Without trying it - change the criteria to 4, 5 and 6 vs `4`, etc. >> >> >> > > Hmm, still says Query Too Complex. > > similar and it takes it - but - and I didn't notice this before (how did I miss this) it wants to use double quotes... so the SQL turns into SELECT "Date", weekday( "Date" ), "precipt" FROM "MSIS"."precipitation" AS "precipitation" WHERE ( "precipt" > 0 AND weekday( "Date" ) = '4' OR weekday( "Date" ) = '5' OR weekday( "Date" ) = '6' ) --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@... For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@... |
|
|
Re: Query Compexity in Design ModeOk there is a problem.
This time I am using JDBC 5.1.6 If I construct my query this way: SELECT `Date`, weekday( `Date` ) FROM `MSIS`.`precipitation` AS `precipitation` WHERE `precipt` > 0 AND ( weekday( `Date` ) = '4' OR weekday( `Date` ) = '5' OR weekday( `Date` ) = '6' ) No problem But as soon as I flip it aroung the way you have it SELECT `Date`, weekday( `Date` ) FROM `MSIS`.`precipitation` AS `precipitation` WHERE ( weekday( `Date` ) = '4' OR weekday( `Date` ) = '5' OR weekday( `Date` ) = '6' ) AND `precipt` > 0 Then I get a syntax error bringing it into the designer... --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@... For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@... |
|
|
Re: Query Compexity in Design ModeOn Sat, 2009-08-08 at 19:24 -0400, Drew Jensen wrote:
> Keith Clark wrote: > > On Sat, 2009-08-08 at 19:07 -0400, Drew Jensen wrote: > > > >> Keith Clark wrote: > >> > >>> Why is the following query too complex to be viewed in the design mode? > >>> > >>> SELECT `Date`, weekday( `Date` ) AS `Weekday`, > >>> `Precipitation` AS `Precip` > >>> FROM `kwbo4418_WaterlooWeather2000`.`2005` AS `2005` > >>> WHERE ( weekday( `Date` ) = '4' > >>> OR weekday( `Date` ) = '5' > >>> OR weekday( `Date` ) = '6' ) > >>> AND `Precipitation` > 0 > >>> > >>> > >>> > >> Without trying it - change the criteria to 4, 5 and 6 vs `4`, etc. > >> > >> > >> > > > > Hmm, still says Query Too Complex. > > > > > Are you using the Native connector? I just constructed something > similar and it takes it - but - and I didn't notice this before (how did > I miss this) it wants to use double quotes... so the SQL turns into > SELECT "Date", weekday( "Date" ), "precipt" FROM "MSIS"."precipitation" > AS "precipitation" WHERE ( "precipt" > 0 AND weekday( "Date" ) = '4' OR > weekday( "Date" ) = '5' OR weekday( "Date" ) = '6' ) > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@... For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@... |
|
|
Re: Query Compexity in Design ModeOn Sat, 2009-08-08 at 19:37 -0400, Drew Jensen wrote:
> Ok there is a problem. > > This time I am using JDBC 5.1.6 > > If I construct my query this way: > > SELECT `Date`, weekday( `Date` ) > > FROM `MSIS`.`precipitation` AS `precipitation` > > WHERE `precipt` > 0 > > AND ( weekday( `Date` ) = '4' > > OR weekday( `Date` ) = '5' > > OR weekday( `Date` ) = '6' > > ) > > > No problem > > But as soon as I flip it aroung the way you have it > > SELECT `Date`, weekday( `Date` ) > > FROM `MSIS`.`precipitation` AS `precipitation` > > WHERE ( weekday( `Date` ) = '4' > > OR weekday( `Date` ) = '5' > > OR weekday( `Date` ) = '6' > > ) > AND `precipt` > 0 > > > Then I get a syntax error bringing it into the designer... Interesting.... So it matters what order the "ands" and "ors" are in? Keith --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@... For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@... |
|
|
Re: Query Compexity in Design Mode> Interesting.... > > So it matters what order the "ands" and "ors" are in? > > Keith > Well the GUI designer trys to put ANDs before ORs..that I've seen before. However - I just ran all this with an earlier 3.1.1 development build and not the 3.1.1 RC1 build. I will be installing the RC1 package later tonight and will see if anything changes . --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@... For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@... |
|
|
Re: Query Compexity in Design Mode> Interesting....
> > So it matters what order the "ands" and "ors" are in? > > Keith > Well the GUI designer trys to put ANDs before ORs..that I've seen before. However - I just ran all this with an earlier 3.1.1 development build and not the 3.1.1 RC1 build. I will be installing the RC1 package later tonight and will see if anything changes . --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@... For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@... |
|
|
Re: Query Compexity in Design Modethen again you could change the query to this:
SELECT `Date`, weekday( `Date` ) FROM `MSIS`.`precipitation` AS `precipitation` WHERE weekday( `Date` ) in ( '4', '5', '6' ) AND `precipt` > 0 The designer likes this construct. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@... For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@... |
|
|
Re: Query Compexity in Design ModeOn Sat, 2009-08-08 at 19:56 -0400, Drew Jensen wrote:
> > Interesting.... > > > > So it matters what order the "ands" and "ors" are in? > > > > Keith > > > > Well the GUI designer trys to put ANDs before ORs..that I've seen before. > However - I just ran all this with an earlier 3.1.1 development build > and not the 3.1.1 RC1 build. > I will be installing the RC1 package later tonight and will see if > anything changes . Actually Drew, I just flipped it and I still get a Query Too Complex SELECT `Date`, weekday( `Date` ) AS `Weekday`, `Precipitation` AS `Precip` FROM `kwbo4418_WaterlooWeather2000`.`2005` AS `2005` WHERE `Precipitation` > 0 AND ( weekday( `Date` ) = 4 OR weekday( `Date` ) = 5 OR weekday( `Date` ) = 6 ) --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@... For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@... |
|
|
Re: Query Compexity in Design ModeOn Sat, 2009-08-08 at 20:00 -0400, Drew Jensen wrote:
> then again you could change the query to this: > > SELECT `Date`, weekday( `Date` ) FROM `MSIS`.`precipitation` AS `precipitation` > > WHERE > > weekday( `Date` ) in ( '4', '5', '6' ) > > AND > > `precipt` > 0 > > > The designer likes this construct. > Perfectamundo. Thanks. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@... For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@... |
|
|
Re: Query Compexity in Design ModeKeith Clark wrote:
> Why is the following query too complex to be viewed in the design mode? > > SELECT `Date`, weekday( `Date` ) AS `Weekday`, > `Precipitation` AS `Precip` > FROM `kwbo4418_WaterlooWeather2000`.`2005` AS `2005` > WHERE ( weekday( `Date` ) = '4' > OR weekday( `Date` ) = '5' > OR weekday( `Date` ) = '6' ) > AND `Precipitation` > 0 Since the "query designer" does not handle many valid queries, I consider this tool as obsolete, experimental or waste of time. I use it to collect the names of tables and fields before I compose the query in text mode or in a text editor. Today I found that it can not even group by calculated fields: SELECT "Forname"||','||"Surname" AS "Patient Info", [...] GROUP BY "Patient Info" --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@... For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@... |
|
|
Re: Re: Query Compexity in Design ModeAndreas Saeger wrote:
> > Since the "query designer" does not handle many valid queries, I > consider this tool as obsolete, experimental or waste of time. > I use it to collect the names of tables and fields before I compose > the query in text mode or in a text editor. > > Today I found that it can not even group by calculated fields: > SELECT "Forname"||','||"Surname" AS "Patient Info", > [...] > GROUP BY "Patient Info" > Works for me using the 3.2 pre-release build *http://tinyurl.com/kp5yrf Drew * |
|
|
Re: Re: Query Compexity in Design ModeOn Mon, 2009-08-10 at 08:23 -0400, Drew Jensen wrote:
> Andreas Saeger wrote: > > > > Since the "query designer" does not handle many valid queries, I > > consider this tool as obsolete, experimental or waste of time. > > I use it to collect the names of tables and fields before I compose > > the query in text mode or in a text editor. > > > > Today I found that it can not even group by calculated fields: > > SELECT "Forname"||','||"Surname" AS "Patient Info", > > [...] > > GROUP BY "Patient Info" > > > I'm using 3.0 and can confirm this in that version. I ran into it over the weekend as well. > Works for me using the 3.2 pre-release build > *http://tinyurl.com/kp5yrf > > Drew > * > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@... For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@... |
|
|
Re: Re: Query Compexity in Design ModeKeith Clark wrote:
> On Mon, 2009-08-10 at 08:23 -0400, Drew Jensen wrote: > >> Andreas Saeger wrote: >> >>> Since the "query designer" does not handle many valid queries, I >>> consider this tool as obsolete, experimental or waste of time. >>> I use it to collect the names of tables and fields before I compose >>> the query in text mode or in a text editor. >>> >>> Today I found that it can not even group by calculated fields: >>> SELECT "Forname"||','||"Surname" AS "Patient Info", >>> [...] >>> GROUP BY "Patient Info" >>> >>> > > I'm using 3.0 and can confirm this in that version. I ran into it over > the weekend as well. > 3.1 and the upcoming 3.1.1 do not support it either , support for this is added in the 3.2 release. - 3.2 is scheduled for sometime in November from what I've seen in lists. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@... For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@... |
|
|
Re: Re: Query Compexity in Design ModeOn Mon, 2009-08-10 at 08:50 -0400, Drew Jensen wrote:
> Keith Clark wrote: > > On Mon, 2009-08-10 at 08:23 -0400, Drew Jensen wrote: > > > >> Andreas Saeger wrote: > >> > >>> Since the "query designer" does not handle many valid queries, I > >>> consider this tool as obsolete, experimental or waste of time. > >>> I use it to collect the names of tables and fields before I compose > >>> the query in text mode or in a text editor. > >>> > >>> Today I found that it can not even group by calculated fields: > >>> SELECT "Forname"||','||"Surname" AS "Patient Info", > >>> [...] > >>> GROUP BY "Patient Info" > >>> > >>> > > > > I'm using 3.0 and can confirm this in that version. I ran into it over > > the weekend as well. > > > > 3.1 and the upcoming 3.1.1 do not support it either , support for this > is added in the 3.2 release. > > - 3.2 is scheduled for sometime in November from what I've seen in lists. > > Good stuff. Continuous Improvement! --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@... For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@... |
|
|
Re: Re: Query Compexity in Design ModeHello Drew,
On Monday 10 August 2009, 09:50, Drew Jensen wrote: > 3.1 and the upcoming 3.1.1 do not support it either , support for this > is added in the 3.2 release. > > - 3.2 is scheduled for sometime in November from what I've seen in lists. to follow release dates, you can track http://wiki.services.openoffice.org/wiki/OOoRelease32 by now 3.2 is targeted to end of November Regards -- Ariel Constenla-Haile La Plata, Argentina --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@... For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@... |
|
|
Re: Query Compexity in Design ModeDrew Jensen wrote:
> Andreas Saeger wrote: >> [...] >> Today I found that it can not even group by calculated fields: >> SELECT "Forname"||','||"Surname" AS "Patient Info", >> [...] >> GROUP BY "Patient Info" >> > > Works for me using the 3.2 pre-release build > *http://tinyurl.com/kp5yrf > > Drew > * > > Next one converting 2-digit years into 4 digit years (1909-2008): SELECT (CASE WHEN ("P"."Jahr"+2000)>=YEAR(CURRENT_DATE) THEN 1900 ELSE 2000 END)+ "P"."Jahr" AS "Four Digit Year" Yields an SQL syntax error. Does works in direct mode. However, direct mode is read-only and fails in subforms (relation to parent form fails silently). --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@... For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@... |
|
|
Re: Query Compexity in Design ModeAndreas Saeger wrote:
> Next one converting 2-digit years into 4 digit years (1909-2008): > SELECT (CASE WHEN ("P"."Jahr"+2000)>=YEAR(CURRENT_DATE) THEN 1900 ELSE > 2000 END)+ "P"."Jahr" AS "Four Digit Year" > > Yields an SQL syntax error. Does works in direct mode. However, direct > mode is read-only and fails in subforms (relation to parent form fails > silently). And another one merging tables and queries: SELECT ... WHERE ("qryA"."XID"="tblA"."ID")AND("tblB"."X"="tblC"."Y")... Fails with unknown column, strips "quryA" when loaded in design mode, but runs well while testing in parsed SQL mode. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@... For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@... |
| < Prev | 1 - 2 | Next > |
| Free embeddable forum powered by Nabble | Forum Help |