|
View:
New views
7 Messages
—
Rating Filter:
Alert me
|
|
|
Question about owner and group defaulting rules in MS-ADTSHi, In MS-ADTS, section 7.1.3.6, is written the following: The GROUP field is defaulted as follows: § If the DAG was used as the default OWNER
field value, then the same SID is written into the GROUP field. However, it appears that the creating user’s primary
group is ALWAYS used as the default group, regardless of partition or owner. Example: We create an object in the domain partition, say an OU,
without providing an nTSecurityDescriptor. The creating user is a member of
Domain Admins, with primary group Domain Users, so the DAG is Domain admins as
per the DAG rules in the same document. Domain Admins is used as the OWNER in
the new object’s security descriptor. According to the above statement,
Domain Admins should also be set as the default group. However, in a Windows
2003 server, Domain Users is defaulted as the group in the new object’s
descriptor. If the user’s primary group is changed to Domain Admins, then
the group of the new object is defaulted to Domain Admins. The above behavior is consistent with
CreateSecurityDescriptor algorithm from MS-DTYP, where the primary group of the
security token is assigned if a group is not provided. Could you please clarify the contradiction between Regards, Nadezhda Ivanova
_______________________________________________ cifs-protocol mailing list cifs-protocol@... https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/cifs-protocol |
|||||||||
|
|
Re: Question about owner and group defaulting rules in MS-ADTSGood morning! I have created case SRX090804600022 to track our
work for your request. One of my team colleagues will take ownership of the
case and contact you shortly. Regards, CELL: +1(704) 661-5438 From: Nadezhda Ivanova
[mailto:nadezhda.ivanova@...] Hi, In
MS-ADTS, section 7.1.3.6, is written the following: The GROUP field is defaulted as
follows: § If the DAG was
used as the default OWNER field value, then the same SID is written into the
GROUP field. However,
it appears that the creating user’s primary group is ALWAYS used as the default
group, regardless of partition or owner. Example: We
create an object in the domain partition, say an OU, without providing an
nTSecurityDescriptor. The creating user is a member of Domain Admins, with
primary group Domain Users, so the DAG is Domain admins as per the DAG rules in
the same document. Domain Admins is used as the OWNER in the new object’s security
descriptor. According to the above statement, Domain Admins should also be set
as the default group. However, in a Windows 2003 server, Domain Users is
defaulted as the group in the new object’s descriptor. If the user’s primary
group is changed to Domain Admins, then the group of the new object is
defaulted to Domain Admins. The
above behavior is consistent with CreateSecurityDescriptor algorithm from
MS-DTYP, where the primary group of the security token is assigned if a group
is not provided. Could
you please clarify the contradiction between MS-ADTS, MS-DTYP and actual
behavior? Regards, Nadezhda
Ivanova
_______________________________________________ cifs-protocol mailing list cifs-protocol@... https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/cifs-protocol |
|||||||||
|
|
Re: Question about owner and group defaulting rules in MS-ADTSHi Nadezhda: I have assumed the ownership of this issue. I’ll keep you
updated on the progress as appropriate. If you have any further question/clarification on this issue,
please feel free to contact me. Regards, Obaid Farooqi Sr. Support Escalation Engineer | Microsoft From: Bill Wesse Good morning! I have created case SRX090804600022 to track our
work for your request. One of my team colleagues will take ownership of the
case and contact you shortly. Regards, CELL: +1(704) 661-5438 From: Nadezhda Ivanova
[mailto:nadezhda.ivanova@...] Hi, In
MS-ADTS, section 7.1.3.6, is written the following: The GROUP field is defaulted as
follows: § If the DAG was
used as the default OWNER field value, then the same SID is written into the
GROUP field. However,
it appears that the creating user’s primary group is ALWAYS used as the
default group, regardless of partition or owner. Example: We
create an object in the domain partition, say an OU, without providing an
nTSecurityDescriptor. The creating user is a member of Domain Admins, with
primary group Domain Users, so the DAG is Domain admins as per the DAG rules in
the same document. Domain Admins is used as the OWNER in the new object’s
security descriptor. According to the above statement, Domain Admins should
also be set as the default group. However, in a Windows 2003 server, Domain
Users is defaulted as the group in the new object’s descriptor. If the
user’s primary group is changed to Domain Admins, then the group of the
new object is defaulted to Domain Admins. The
above behavior is consistent with CreateSecurityDescriptor algorithm from
MS-DTYP, where the primary group of the security token is assigned if a group
is not provided. Could
you please clarify the contradiction between MS-ADTS, MS-DTYP and actual
behavior? Regards, Nadezhda
Ivanova
_______________________________________________ cifs-protocol mailing list cifs-protocol@... https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/cifs-protocol |
|||||||||
|
|
|
|||||||||
|
|
||
|
|
CISCO
SYSTEMS |
|
|
|
|
|
Hi Nadezhda:
I have just sent you the answer for the security descriptor
algorithm question. The work on “owner and group rules in MS-ADTS” is in
progress and I’ll be in touch as soon as I have an answer.
Thanks for your patience.
Regards,
Obaid Farooqi
Sr. Support Escalation Engineer | Microsoft
From: Nadezhda Ivanova
[mailto:nadezhda.ivanova@...]
Sent: Tuesday, August 11, 2009 5:33 AM
To: Obaid Farooqi
Cc: pfif@...; cifs-protocol@...
Subject: RE: Question about owner and group defaulting rules in MS-ADTS
Hi Obaid,
Is there any progress on this issue, or my other enquiry about the
security descriptor creation algorithms? It’s been a while now and we need this
information to be able to include the security implementation in the next alpha
of Samba 4.
Best Regards,
Nadezhda Ivanova
From: Obaid Farooqi
Sent: Wednesday, August 05, 2009 6:33 PM
To: Nadezhda Ivanova
Cc: pfif@...; cifs-protocol@...
Subject: RE: Question about owner and group defaulting rules in MS-ADTS
Hi Nadezhda:
I have assumed the ownership of this issue. I’ll keep you
updated on the progress as appropriate.
If you have any further question/clarification on this issue,
please feel free to contact me.
Regards,
Obaid Farooqi
Sr. Support Escalation Engineer | Microsoft
From: Bill Wesse
Sent: Tuesday, August 04, 2009 8:13 AM
To: Nadezhda Ivanova; Interoperability Documentation Help
Cc: pfif@...; cifs-protocol@...
Subject: RE: Question about owner and group defaulting rules in MS-ADTS
Good morning! I have created case SRX090804600022 to track our
work for your request. One of my team colleagues will take ownership of the
case and contact you shortly.
Regards,
Bill Wesse
MCSE, MCTS / Senior Escalation Engineer, US-CSS DSC PROTOCOL
TEAM
8055 Microsoft Way
Charlotte, NC 28273
TEL:
+1(980) 776-8200
CELL: +1(704) 661-5438
FAX:
+1(704) 665-9606
From: Nadezhda Ivanova
[mailto:nadezhda.ivanova@...]
Sent: Tuesday, August 04, 2009 3:58 AM
To: Interoperability Documentation Help
Cc: pfif@...; cifs-protocol@...
Subject: Question about owner and group defaulting rules in MS-ADTS
Hi,
In
MS-ADTS, section 7.1.3.6, is written the following:
The GROUP field is defaulted as
follows:
§ If the DAG was
used as the default OWNER field value, then the same SID is written into the
GROUP field.
However,
it appears that the creating user’s primary group is ALWAYS used as the default
group, regardless of partition or owner.
Example:
We
create an object in the domain partition, say an OU, without providing an
nTSecurityDescriptor. The creating user is a member of Domain Admins, with
primary group Domain Users, so the DAG is Domain admins as per the DAG rules in
the same document. Domain Admins is used as the OWNER in the new object’s
security descriptor. According to the above statement, Domain Admins should
also be set as the default group. However, in a Windows 2003 server, Domain
Users is defaulted as the group in the new object’s descriptor. If the user’s
primary group is changed to Domain Admins, then the group of the new object is
defaulted to Domain Admins.
The
above behavior is consistent with CreateSecurityDescriptor algorithm from
MS-DTYP, where the primary group of the security token is assigned if a group
is not provided.
Could
you please clarify the contradiction between MS-ADTS, MS-DTYP and actual behavior?
Regards,
Nadezhda
Ivanova
|
|
||
|
Nadezhda Ivanova |
CISCO SYSTEMS BULGARIA EOOD |
|
|
|
|
|
Hi Nadezhda:
We have finished our investigation on “Owner and Group
Defaulting Rules”. In a future version of MS-ADTS, section 7.1.3.6 and
7.1.3 will be modified. Please find the PDF version of modifications attached
to this email.
Please let me know if this answers your question. If yes,
I’ll consider this issue resolved.
Regards,
Obaid Farooqi
Sr. Support Escalation Engineer | Microsoft
From: Nadezhda Ivanova
[mailto:nadezhda.ivanova@...]
Sent: Tuesday, August 04, 2009 2:58 AM
To: Interoperability Documentation Help
Cc: pfif@...; cifs-protocol@...
Subject: Question about owner and group defaulting rules in MS-ADTS
Hi,
In
MS-ADTS, section 7.1.3.6, is written the following:
The GROUP field is defaulted as
follows:
§ If the DAG was
used as the default OWNER field value, then the same SID is written into the
GROUP field.
However,
it appears that the creating user’s primary group is ALWAYS used as the
default group, regardless of partition or owner.
Example:
We
create an object in the domain partition, say an OU, without providing an
nTSecurityDescriptor. The creating user is a member of Domain Admins, with
primary group Domain Users, so the DAG is Domain admins as per the DAG rules in
the same document. Domain Admins is used as the OWNER in the new object’s
security descriptor. According to the above statement, Domain Admins should
also be set as the default group. However, in a Windows 2003 server, Domain
Users is defaulted as the group in the new object’s descriptor. If the
user’s primary group is changed to Domain Admins, then the group of the
new object is defaulted to Domain Admins.
The
above behavior is consistent with CreateSecurityDescriptor algorithm from
MS-DTYP, where the primary group of the security token is assigned if a group
is not provided.
Could
you please clarify the contradiction between MS-ADTS, MS-DTYP and actual
behavior?
Regards,
Nadezhda
Ivanova
|
|
||
|
Nadezhda Ivanova |
CISCO SYSTEMS BULGARIA EOOD |
|
|
|
|
|
Hi Obaid,
Thank you for the attached information. I
think it answers the question. Will let you know if something else comes up,
but at this point this seems reasonable.
Regards,
Nadezhda Ivanova
From: Obaid Farooqi
[mailto:obaidf@...]
Sent: Friday, August 14, 2009 7:12
To:
Cc:
Subject: RE: Question about owner
and group defaulting rules in MS-ADTS
Hi Nadezhda:
We have finished our
investigation on “Owner and Group Defaulting Rules”. In a future version of MS-ADTS,
section 7.1.3.6 and 7.1.3 will be modified. Please find the PDF version of
modifications attached to this email.
Please let me know
if this answers your question. If yes, I’ll consider this issue resolved.
Regards,
Obaid Farooqi
Sr. Support Escalation
Engineer | Microsoft
From:
Sent: Tuesday, August 04, 2009
2:58 AM
To: Interoperability Documentation
Help
Cc:
Subject: Question about owner and
group defaulting rules in MS-ADTS
Hi,
In MS-ADTS, section 7.1.3.6, is written the following:
The GROUP field is defaulted as follows:
§ If the DAG was used as the default OWNER
field value, then the same SID is written into the GROUP field.
However, it appears that the creating user’s primary group
is ALWAYS used as the default group, regardless of partition or owner.
Example:
We create an object in the domain partition, say an OU,
without providing an nTSecurityDescriptor. The creating user is a member of
Domain Admins, with primary group Domain Users, so the DAG is Domain admins as
per the DAG rules in the same document. Domain Admins is used as the OWNER in
the new object’s security descriptor. According to the above statement, Domain
Admins should also be set as the default group. However, in a Windows 2003
server, Domain Users is defaulted as the group in the new object’s descriptor.
If the user’s primary group is changed to Domain Admins, then the group of the
new object is defaulted to Domain Admins.
The above behavior is consistent with
CreateSecurityDescriptor algorithm from MS-DTYP, where the primary group of the
security token is assigned if a group is not provided.
Could you please clarify the contradiction between
Regards,
|
|
||
|
|
CISCO
SYSTEMS |
|
|
|
|
|
| Free embeddable forum powered by Nabble | Forum Help |