|
View:
New views
2 Messages
—
Rating Filter:
Alert me
|
|
|
Questions from future content creator
Hello,
I'm Moca and before anything I apologize if this is not the sort of question to post here and/or my ignorance on the topic. I am a web designer starting to read on developing content for devices and came across your great document on DI. It would be great if you could expand on ideas for testing... even if we followed a structure when creating content, nothing really guarantees it will look or function the same across devices until you test it. Testing only on targeted devices or ones you can afford to me defeats the purpose of trying to create content that can be accessed across any device if you can never test it... it seems like an impossible challenge. In the document, you mentioned many different media types but did not include Flash content as one. I am very curious to know the group's position in relation to Flash Lite content. Thanks a lot, Moca --
U.S. voIP: (305) 9267775 fax: (786) 513.3714 mob: (61) 0415.716.396 home: (61) 02 9810.9351 web: www.mocaloca.com |
|
|
RE: Questions from future content creatorHello Moca,
Very briefly, testing is the only guarantee. If you have
good device knowledge (i.e. tests of generic cases have been conducted and
results recorded) then you may be able to reduce some of the testing by adhering
to the device knowledge you have. The bad news is that to be sure of the highest
quality on the widest range of devices, you will probably need a good adaptation
solution that has all this device knowledge built-in.
The DIWG has produced several documents related to DI, but
you do not identify which one you refer to as "great". Nevertheless, on behalf
of the group, thank you.
You can try to limit the content to features that are known
to pose fewer problems. The W3C MWI Best Practices group has much to say on the
matter of producing content that will work on a broad range. Of course, imposing
such limitations may reduce the perceived quality of the presentations,
especially for end-users who expect exciting colourful
interaction.
The media types covered in W3C documents tend to favour
those that are associated with recommended W3C technologies. Proprietary
technologies are acknowledge but are not the focus of discussions or examples.
Media type that are not supported by the majority of browsers except via
proprietary plug-ins (free or otherwise) tend to be omitted from our
documentation.
I cannot speak on behalf of the group with respect to an
opinion on a particular proprietary technology, but I believe that we understand
that such technolgies have a role to play, especially in niche domains. However,
where possible, technolgies that have the widest "out-of-the-box" support should
be favoured.
There are a number of vendors of specialised solutions to
multi-device Web content, some of whom are represented in DIWG. I suggest you
survey the documentation that they offer on-line to educate yourself on what is
possible and practical. If you are looking for low-cost solutions (without the
"wow" factor of the professionals) then the open source community has a few
simple solutions to offer.
---Rotan Hanrahan (DI, and chair of DD)
From: www-di-request@... [mailto:www-di-request@...] On Behalf Of Moca Sent: 18 July 2006 09:07 To: www-di@... Subject: Questions from future content creator I'm Moca and before anything I apologize if this is not the sort of question to post here and/or my ignorance on the topic. I am a web designer starting to read on developing content for devices and came across your great document on DI. It would be great if you could expand on ideas for testing... even if we followed a structure when creating content, nothing really guarantees it will look or function the same across devices until you test it. Testing only on targeted devices or ones you can afford to me defeats the purpose of trying to create content that can be accessed across any device if you can never test it... it seems like an impossible challenge. In the document, you mentioned many different media types but did not include Flash content as one. I am very curious to know the group's position in relation to Flash Lite content. Thanks a lot, Moca --
U.S. voIP: (305) 9267775 fax: (786) 513.3714 mob: (61) 0415.716.396 home: (61) 02 9810.9351 web: www.mocaloca.com |
| Free embeddable forum powered by Nabble | Forum Help |