
Some parts of this message have been removed.
Learn more about Nabble's
security policy.
Thank you Fabio,
I used a backpropagation method and I used activation sigmoid function.
Is it maybe for that I have to normalize?
Andrea
Da: Fábio Blessa [mailto:fabioblessa@...]
Inviato: mercoledì 2 novembre 2011 19.23
A: FANN General and development discussion
Oggetto: Re: [Fann-general] size ANN training input
Normalization you mean?
Does it depends on the training algorithm? Having your data normalized is a good practice.
On Nov 2, 2011 2:49 PM, "Andrea_Viano" <viano@...> wrote:
Hi,
Is there anyone that knows why training inputs of an ANN have to be less than 1 to have a convergence? I tried with my regular input( 10000,or 8 etc), and I had a very high and constant error. If I divided training inputs to reach numbers close to the unity I could find a solution of my ANN.
Can you help me to solve this problem?
Thanks
Andrea
Ing. Andrea Viano
Industry Division

CFD Engineering S.r.l.
Headquarters
Piazza della Vittoria, 7/2A - 16123 Genova (Italy)
Phone +39-010-8540050 - Fax +39-010-8631199
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
RSA® Conference 2012
Save $700 by Nov 18
Register now!
http://p.sf.net/sfu/rsa-sfdev2dev1
_______________________________________________
Fann-general mailing list
Fann-general@...
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fann-general
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
RSA(R) Conference 2012
Save $700 by Nov 18
Register now
http://p.sf.net/sfu/rsa-sfdev2dev1_______________________________________________
Fann-general mailing list
Fann-general@...
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fann-general