RC3: what's in/out

[Hamilton Verissimo]

On 9/6/07, Gökhan Altınören <gokhan@...> wrote:
> I'd love to see AW included, but we might have an issue. ActiveWriter source
> is Apache licensed, but binary release includes DSL Tools redistributable
> (must), which is under MS' VSIP SDK License. So I licensed the whole setup
> as "As Is" with the notification below. VSIP SDK allows you to release your
> code under an OSS license but I'm not sure if we can tag the install
> binaries as Apache v2. If we can (while stating the exceptional binaries and
> their license), I can convert it from as is to Apache v2.

Understood. I'll list it on the downloads page then.

--
Cheers,
hamilton verissimo
hammett@...
http://www.castlestronghold.com/

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Castle Project Development List" group.
To post to this group, send email to castle-project-devel@...
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to castle-project-devel-unsubscribe@...
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/castle-project-devel?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

[Ayende Rahien-2]

It is actually the reverse from a facility, since it is external integration, not internal.
I would be very grateful to have anyone contribute documentations, so feel free to put them somewhere where I can take a peek.

On 9/7/07, Ruprict <glenn.goodrich@...> wrote:

I currently use the WCF (um, non-) facility and it is very useful.  I
would be happy to do some doco on it, but I might need a nudge from

Orin or others on:

1) Where it fits, if it's not a facility.
2) Make sure my doco is not totally wrong.


I am (as I am sure you know) not really a contributor, but we all have
to stop somewhere, right?

Any interest?
Glenn

On Sep 5, 11:38 pm, "Hamilton Verissimo"
<hamm...@...> wrote:

> Hey all,
>
> So the 1.0 branch is almost OK, the next step is the Wix setup wizard.
> And then it comes down to decide what is going to be on it. We have
> the option to include the whole contrib as a separated file (zip) but
> that might mislead people to think that we support it. Offering it as
> a separated download is another option.
>
> What I like best is to include a few contrib projects that have proven
> their value, are documented and supported. I'd like to include,
> provided that everyone is OK with that:
>
> - CVSI (need to figure out how)
> - ActiveWriter (ditto)
> - MR ViewComponents
>
> The other contributions are being left out due to either lack of
> documentation of lack of support. I've seen questions popping here in
> this list and not being fully appreciated. This can be reviewed for
> the 1.0 release, though, so dont need to curse me.
>
> From the main trunk, I'd like to leave some things out. Namely:
>
> - DictionaryAdapter (what is it for anyway?)
> - Facilities:
>   - Cache (stalled)
>   - Db4o (license issues)
>   - DynamicLoader (no documentation whatsoever)
>   - EnterpriseLibrary (stalled)
>   - iBatisNet (stalled)
>   - Prevalence (stalled)
>   - Synchronize (no documentation at all)
>   - Wcf (no documentation and it's not even a facility)
>   - ManagementExtensions (stalled)
>   - Security (stalled)
>
> Obviously, everything is open to discussion.
>
> Thanks
>
> --
> Cheers,
> hamilton verissimo
> hamm...@...://www.castlestronghold.com/

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Castle Project Development List" group.
To post to this group, send email to castle-project-devel@...
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to castle-project-devel-unsubscribe@...
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/castle-project-devel?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

[Glenn Goodrich]

How's this look as a start:

http://www.goodrichs.net/castle/container/facilities/v1rc3/wcf/index.html

On Sep 9, 6:48 am, "Ayende Rahien" <aye...@...> wrote:

> It is actually the reverse from a facility, since it is external
> integration, not internal.
> I would be very grateful to have anyone contribute documentations, so feel
> free to put them somewhere where I can take a peek.
>
> On 9/7/07, Ruprict <glenn.goodr...@...> wrote:
>
>
>
> > I currently use the WCF (um, non-) facility and it is very useful.  I
> > would be happy to do some doco on it, but I might need a nudge from
> > Orin or others on:
>
> > 1) Where it fits, if it's not a facility.
> > 2) Make sure my doco is not totally wrong.
>
> > I am (as I am sure you know) not really a contributor, but we all have
> > to stop somewhere, right?
>
> > Any interest?
> > Glenn
>
> > On Sep 5, 11:38 pm, "Hamilton Verissimo"
> > <hamm...@...> wrote:
> > > Hey all,
>
> > > So the 1.0 branch is almost OK, the next step is the Wix setup wizard.
> > > And then it comes down to decide what is going to be on it. We have
> > > the option to include the whole contrib as a separated file (zip) but
> > > that might mislead people to think that we support it. Offering it as
> > > a separated download is another option.
>
> > > What I like best is to include a few contrib projects that have proven
> > > their value, are documented and supported. I'd like to include,
> > > provided that everyone is OK with that:
>
> > > - CVSI (need to figure out how)
> > > - ActiveWriter (ditto)
> > > - MR ViewComponents
>
> > > The other contributions are being left out due to either lack of
> > > documentation of lack of support. I've seen questions popping here in
> > > this list and not being fully appreciated. This can be reviewed for
> > > the 1.0 release, though, so dont need to curse me.
>
> > > From the main trunk, I'd like to leave some things out. Namely:
>
> > > - DictionaryAdapter (what is it for anyway?)
> > > - Facilities:
> > >   - Cache (stalled)
> > >   - Db4o (license issues)
> > >   - DynamicLoader (no documentation whatsoever)
> > >   - EnterpriseLibrary (stalled)
> > >   - iBatisNet (stalled)
> > >   - Prevalence (stalled)
> > >   - Synchronize (no documentation at all)
> > >   - Wcf (no documentation and it's not even a facility)
> > >   - ManagementExtensions (stalled)
> > >   - Security (stalled)
>
> > > Obviously, everything is open to discussion.
>
> > > Thanks
>
> > > --
> > > Cheers,
> > > hamilton verissimo
> > > hamm...@...://www.castlestronghold.com/

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Castle Project Development List" group.
To post to this group, send email to castle-project-devel@...
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to castle-project-devel-unsubscribe@...
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/castle-project-devel?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

[Hamilton Verissimo]

Looking good!

On 9/10/07, Ruprict <glenn.goodrich@...> wrote:

>
> How's this look as a start:
>
> http://www.goodrichs.net/castle/container/facilities/v1rc3/wcf/index.html
>
> On Sep 9, 6:48 am, "Ayende Rahien" <aye...@...> wrote:
> > It is actually the reverse from a facility, since it is external
> > integration, not internal.
> > I would be very grateful to have anyone contribute documentations, so feel
> > free to put them somewhere where I can take a peek.
> >
> > On 9/7/07, Ruprict <glenn.goodr...@...> wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > > I currently use the WCF (um, non-) facility and it is very useful.  I
> > > would be happy to do some doco on it, but I might need a nudge from
> > > Orin or others on:
> >
> > > 1) Where it fits, if it's not a facility.
> > > 2) Make sure my doco is not totally wrong.
> >
> > > I am (as I am sure you know) not really a contributor, but we all have
> > > to stop somewhere, right?
> >
> > > Any interest?
> > > Glenn
> >
> > > On Sep 5, 11:38 pm, "Hamilton Verissimo"
> > > <hamm...@...> wrote:
> > > > Hey all,
> >
> > > > So the 1.0 branch is almost OK, the next step is the Wix setup wizard.
> > > > And then it comes down to decide what is going to be on it. We have
> > > > the option to include the whole contrib as a separated file (zip) but
> > > > that might mislead people to think that we support it. Offering it as
> > > > a separated download is another option.
> >
> > > > What I like best is to include a few contrib projects that have proven
> > > > their value, are documented and supported. I'd like to include,
> > > > provided that everyone is OK with that:
> >
> > > > - CVSI (need to figure out how)
> > > > - ActiveWriter (ditto)
> > > > - MR ViewComponents
> >
> > > > The other contributions are being left out due to either lack of
> > > > documentation of lack of support. I've seen questions popping here in
> > > > this list and not being fully appreciated. This can be reviewed for
> > > > the 1.0 release, though, so dont need to curse me.
> >
> > > > From the main trunk, I'd like to leave some things out. Namely:
> >
> > > > - DictionaryAdapter (what is it for anyway?)
> > > > - Facilities:
> > > >   - Cache (stalled)
> > > >   - Db4o (license issues)
> > > >   - DynamicLoader (no documentation whatsoever)
> > > >   - EnterpriseLibrary (stalled)
> > > >   - iBatisNet (stalled)
> > > >   - Prevalence (stalled)
> > > >   - Synchronize (no documentation at all)
> > > >   - Wcf (no documentation and it's not even a facility)
> > > >   - ManagementExtensions (stalled)
> > > >   - Security (stalled)
> >
> > > > Obviously, everything is open to discussion.
> >
> > > > Thanks
> >
> > > > --
> > > > Cheers,
> > > > hamilton verissimo
> > > > hamm...@...://www.castlestronghold.com/
>
>
> >
>

--
Cheers,
hamilton verissimo
hammett@...
http://www.castlestronghold.com/

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Castle Project Development List" group.
To post to this group, send email to castle-project-devel@...
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to castle-project-devel-unsubscribe@...
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/castle-project-devel?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

[Glenn Goodrich]

So, I have put a couple of zip files out there, one for the trunk and
one for rc3.  If the content is wrong (Orin or anyone that has an
opinion) lemme know.   Each zip has:

- new index.xml for the facilities doc dir with a new <li> for the WCF
doc
- patch file for above
- new wcf dir with index.xml

If this is wrong, lemme know.

Oh, I couldn't figure out how to attach a file to my post (I guess I
coulda used a traditional mail cilent, but, er, I didn't wanna, I
guess) so here are the links:

http://www.goodrichs.net/castle/patches/trunk_facility_wcf_doc_add.zip
http://www.goodrichs.net/castle/patches/v1rc3_facility_wcf_doc_add.zip

That work?

On Sep 10, 3:19 pm, "Hamilton Verissimo"
<hamm...@...> wrote:

> Looking good!
>
> On 9/10/07, Ruprict <glenn.goodr...@...> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > How's this look as a start:
>
> >http://www.goodrichs.net/castle/container/facilities/v1rc3/wcf/index....
>
> > On Sep 9, 6:48 am, "Ayende Rahien" <aye...@...> wrote:
> > > It is actually the reverse from a facility, since it is external
> > > integration, not internal.
> > > I would be very grateful to have anyone contribute documentations, so feel
> > > free to put them somewhere where I can take a peek.
>
> > > On 9/7/07, Ruprict <glenn.goodr...@...> wrote:
>
> > > > I currently use the WCF (um, non-) facility and it is very useful.  I
> > > > would be happy to do some doco on it, but I might need a nudge from
> > > > Orin or others on:
>
> > > > 1) Where it fits, if it's not a facility.
> > > > 2) Make sure my doco is not totally wrong.
>
> > > > I am (as I am sure you know) not really a contributor, but we all have
> > > > to stop somewhere, right?
>
> > > > Any interest?
> > > > Glenn
>
> > > > On Sep 5, 11:38 pm, "Hamilton Verissimo"
> > > > <hamm...@...> wrote:
> > > > > Hey all,
>
> > > > > So the 1.0 branch is almost OK, the next step is the Wix setup wizard.
> > > > > And then it comes down to decide what is going to be on it. We have
> > > > > the option to include the whole contrib as a separated file (zip) but
> > > > > that might mislead people to think that we support it. Offering it as
> > > > > a separated download is another option.
>
> > > > > What I like best is to include a few contrib projects that have proven
> > > > > their value, are documented and supported. I'd like to include,
> > > > > provided that everyone is OK with that:
>
> > > > > - CVSI (need to figure out how)
> > > > > - ActiveWriter (ditto)
> > > > > - MR ViewComponents
>
> > > > > The other contributions are being left out due to either lack of
> > > > > documentation of lack of support. I've seen questions popping here in
> > > > > this list and not being fully appreciated. This can be reviewed for
> > > > > the 1.0 release, though, so dont need to curse me.
>
> > > > > From the main trunk, I'd like to leave some things out. Namely:
>
> > > > > - DictionaryAdapter (what is it for anyway?)
> > > > > - Facilities:
> > > > >   - Cache (stalled)
> > > > >   - Db4o (license issues)
> > > > >   - DynamicLoader (no documentation whatsoever)
> > > > >   - EnterpriseLibrary (stalled)
> > > > >   - iBatisNet (stalled)
> > > > >   - Prevalence (stalled)
> > > > >   - Synchronize (no documentation at all)
> > > > >   - Wcf (no documentation and it's not even a facility)
> > > > >   - ManagementExtensions (stalled)
> > > > >   - Security (stalled)
>
> > > > > Obviously, everything is open to discussion.
>
> > > > > Thanks
>
> > > > > --
> > > > > Cheers,
> > > > > hamilton verissimo
> > > > > hamm...@...://www.castlestronghold.com/
>
> --
> Cheers,
> hamilton verissimo
> hamm...@...://www.castlestronghold.com/

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Castle Project Development List" group.
To post to this group, send email to castle-project-devel@...
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to castle-project-devel-unsubscribe@...
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/castle-project-devel?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

[James Curran-2]

Assuming you are using the gmail web interface (http://mail.google.com/mail/), in the bit between the textbox for the reply and the "To:" box there's a line of links: " Add Cc | Add Bcc | Edit Subject | Attach a file"

On 9/12/07, Ruprict <glenn.goodrich@...> wrote:

Oh, I couldn't figure out how to attach a file to my post (I guess I
coulda used a traditional mail cilent, but, er, I didn't wanna, I
guess) so here are the links:

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Castle Project Development List" group.
To post to this group, send email to castle-project-devel@...
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to castle-project-devel-unsubscribe@...
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/castle-project-devel?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

[Hamilton Verissimo]

Applied, thanks!

On 9/12/07, Ruprict <glenn.goodrich@...> wrote:

>
> So, I have put a couple of zip files out there, one for the trunk and
> one for rc3.  If the content is wrong (Orin or anyone that has an
> opinion) lemme know.   Each zip has:
>
> - new index.xml for the facilities doc dir with a new <li> for the WCF
> doc
> - patch file for above
> - new wcf dir with index.xml
>
> If this is wrong, lemme know.
>
> Oh, I couldn't figure out how to attach a file to my post (I guess I
> coulda used a traditional mail cilent, but, er, I didn't wanna, I
> guess) so here are the links:
>
> http://www.goodrichs.net/castle/patches/trunk_facility_wcf_doc_add.zip
> http://www.goodrichs.net/castle/patches/v1rc3_facility_wcf_doc_add.zip
>
> That work?
>
> On Sep 10, 3:19 pm, "Hamilton Verissimo"
> <hamm...@...> wrote:
> > Looking good!
> >
> > On 9/10/07, Ruprict <glenn.goodr...@...> wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > > How's this look as a start:
> >
> > >http://www.goodrichs.net/castle/container/facilities/v1rc3/wcf/index....
> >
> > > On Sep 9, 6:48 am, "Ayende Rahien" <aye...@...> wrote:
> > > > It is actually the reverse from a facility, since it is external
> > > > integration, not internal.
> > > > I would be very grateful to have anyone contribute documentations, so feel
> > > > free to put them somewhere where I can take a peek.
> >
> > > > On 9/7/07, Ruprict <glenn.goodr...@...> wrote:
> >
> > > > > I currently use the WCF (um, non-) facility and it is very useful.  I
> > > > > would be happy to do some doco on it, but I might need a nudge from
> > > > > Orin or others on:
> >
> > > > > 1) Where it fits, if it's not a facility.
> > > > > 2) Make sure my doco is not totally wrong.
> >
> > > > > I am (as I am sure you know) not really a contributor, but we all have
> > > > > to stop somewhere, right?
> >
> > > > > Any interest?
> > > > > Glenn
> >
> > > > > On Sep 5, 11:38 pm, "Hamilton Verissimo"
> > > > > <hamm...@...> wrote:
> > > > > > Hey all,
> >
> > > > > > So the 1.0 branch is almost OK, the next step is the Wix setup wizard.
> > > > > > And then it comes down to decide what is going to be on it. We have
> > > > > > the option to include the whole contrib as a separated file (zip) but
> > > > > > that might mislead people to think that we support it. Offering it as
> > > > > > a separated download is another option.
> >
> > > > > > What I like best is to include a few contrib projects that have proven
> > > > > > their value, are documented and supported. I'd like to include,
> > > > > > provided that everyone is OK with that:
> >
> > > > > > - CVSI (need to figure out how)
> > > > > > - ActiveWriter (ditto)
> > > > > > - MR ViewComponents
> >
> > > > > > The other contributions are being left out due to either lack of
> > > > > > documentation of lack of support. I've seen questions popping here in
> > > > > > this list and not being fully appreciated. This can be reviewed for
> > > > > > the 1.0 release, though, so dont need to curse me.
> >
> > > > > > From the main trunk, I'd like to leave some things out. Namely:
> >
> > > > > > - DictionaryAdapter (what is it for anyway?)
> > > > > > - Facilities:
> > > > > >   - Cache (stalled)
> > > > > >   - Db4o (license issues)
> > > > > >   - DynamicLoader (no documentation whatsoever)
> > > > > >   - EnterpriseLibrary (stalled)
> > > > > >   - iBatisNet (stalled)
> > > > > >   - Prevalence (stalled)
> > > > > >   - Synchronize (no documentation at all)
> > > > > >   - Wcf (no documentation and it's not even a facility)
> > > > > >   - ManagementExtensions (stalled)
> > > > > >   - Security (stalled)
> >
> > > > > > Obviously, everything is open to discussion.
> >
> > > > > > Thanks
> >
> > > > > > --
> > > > > > Cheers,
> > > > > > hamilton verissimo
> > > > > > hamm...@...://www.castlestronghold.com/
> >
> > --
> > Cheers,
> > hamilton verissimo
> > hamm...@...://www.castlestronghold.com/
>
>
> >
>

--
Cheers,
hamilton verissimo
hammett@...
http://www.castlestronghold.com/

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Castle Project Development List" group.
To post to this group, send email to castle-project-devel@...
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to castle-project-devel-unsubscribe@...
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/castle-project-devel?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---