> On 11/5/05, Cristov Russell <
wolfsong@...> wrote:
> > Rod I don't think this voting system will work. Mainly
> because there
> > are multiple solutions proposed and your system seems to be
> predicated
> > on a single change. I do think it's an interesting idea to
> allow for
> > "levels" of feeling but it doesn't seem applicable.
>
> I'm only putting one single proposal to the vote. Changing
> the style guide entry from what it is currently, to the one I
> proposed.
However that is not what the structure of the page implies. The page states
"Proposed Solutions" with 3 sub headings. Your intent here is to vote on
your proposition and not all the options.
> > Also, if a consensus can be reached with the Style
> Ministers involved
> > a vote shouldn't be necessary. There still needs to be a
> process and
> > control to the implementation of changes as well which I
> will include in my proposal.
>
> My vote isn't intended to be binding. Just a way of
> personally testing the waters of public opinion and seeing if
> there *is* concensus. Because despite all the talk, I can't
> tell who is for, against, or completely indifferent to such a change.
>
> Rod.
>
> --
> :: Rod Begbie ::
http://groovymother.com/ ::
Probably all voting should be done by the SC which again is why there needs
to be a process on how to determine consensus or lack thereof, the voting
process and the implementation process.
________________________________
Cristov (wolfsong)
A man of learning is never bored. - jean paul richter
_______________________________________________
Musicbrainz-style mailing list
Musicbrainz-style@...
http://lists.musicbrainz.org/mailman/listinfo/musicbrainz-style
