« Return to Thread: AutomatedInstallData vs. InstallData

RE: AutomatedInstallData vs. InstallData

by ZellKries :: Rate this Message:

Some parts of this message have been removed. Learn more about Nabble's security policy.

Hi I'm not a master in the subject but I think the main difference between then is that the install data is the one that the installer will use and modify trough the installation, and the automated data will be like the event mirror so then IzPack generate the atuomatic xml installation file (so it can be runned in diffent pc with the same installation settings).

Reggards,

Kries

> Date: Fri, 23 Oct 2009 16:01:26 -0700
> From: dngan@...
> To: user@...
> Subject: [izpack-user] AutomatedInstallData vs. InstallData
>
>
> What is the practical difference between using AutomatedInstallData and
> InstallData? Why are there two "install data" objects? InstallData extends
> AutomatedInstallData and they are both singletons, right? If I add an item
> to the InstallData object, will it be accessible from the
> AutomatedInstallData object (and vice versa)? Why do some methods get passed
> the AutomatedInstallData object (such as executeAction() in panel actions)
> while an InstallData object is passed in for things like the constructor for
> custom panels?
> --
> View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/AutomatedInstallData-vs.-InstallData-tp26034411p26034411.html
> Sent from the izpack - users @ codehaus mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe from this list, please visit:
>
> http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email
>
>

« Return to Thread: AutomatedInstallData vs. InstallData