RE: Comments / Ideas for MNG-3244

>It's ugly, but there is a workaround for this now in respecifying the  
>URLs in the child POMs. It's a pain but it's not the end of the world  
>and I'd say better than adding even more voodoo.

Most people would say this isn't an acceptable workaround.

>I would say that's the best way to go - keep  
>behaving the same way as now for 4.0.0 POMs, and come up with a better

>solution for people that choose to use 4.1.0 POMs (once they are in  
>place).

I'm leaning this way but I was hoping we could find some solution. It is
a popular issue and I'd hate to just punt it. Anyone else have a
suggestion?

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@...
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@...