Some parts of this message have been removed.
Learn more about Nabble's
security policy.
Thank you for this issue. We tracked it as Issue 4421 [1]
in our short Last Call period. The Working Group renamed section 1.1 to “Web
Service” to “Service Description” [2], fixed the incorrect prefix in 1.4.5 [3],
and changed “At the abstract level” to “At a high level” [4].
The spec should be in Proposed Recommendation shortly, if you
disagree with the resolution of this issue please inform us as soon as
possible.
[1] http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=4421
[2] http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/ws/desc/wsdl20/wsdl20.html?content-type=text/html;%20charset=utf-8#intro_ws
[3] http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/ws/desc/wsdl20/wsdl20.html?content-type=text/html;%20charset=utf-8#terminology
[4] http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/ws/desc/wsdl20/wsdl20.html?content-type=text/html;%20charset=utf-8#Description_details
Jonathan Marsh - http://www.wso2.com - http://auburnmarshes.spaces.live.com
Please find the following editorial issues that I find in
Part 1.
1) Why is 1.1 titled "Web Service" ? It does not
describe what a Web Service is. It describes in summary on how WSDL describes a
Web Service. Perhaps it should be titled "Service Description"
or something on those lines
.
2) 1.4.5 --> Inlined Schema
statement - "An XML schema that is defined in the xs:types element
information item of a WSDL 2.0 description."
suggestion - It should be "wsdl:types"
and not "xs:types".
Statement in the spec :- "At the abstract level,
the Description component is just a container for two categories of components:
WSDL 2.0 components and type system components.WSDL 2.0 components are
interfaces, bindings and services. ".
Suggestion :- This gives a message that bindings
and services exist at the abstract level. Is it true ? Moreover, the first
sentence seems to suggest that the later part of the section will go and quote
the Description component at the concrete level - which is missing .
--
Shift to the left, shift to the right!
Pop up, push down, byte, byte, byte!
-Ramkumar Menon
A typical Macroprocessor
