agreed. the 16TB aggregate limits severely limit us as well. for several large image and video workloads we have to create multiple aggregates
and shares which is silly.
--
Daniel Leeds
Manager, Storage Operations
Edmunds.com
310.309.4999
dleeds@...
________________________________________
From:
owner-toasters@... [
owner-toasters@...] On Behalf Of James Beal [
james_@...]
Sent: Tuesday, June 02, 2009 10:22 AM
To:
toasters@...
Subject: Re: HSM/ILM for Netapp
>
>
> To me, the big issue I want to see addressed is the size of NetApp
> Aggregates. 16Tb aggregates are *stupid* esp since they have Raid
> Groups.
This is a serious issue for us, one group in particular will not
consider any file system less than 50Tb.