« Return to Thread: JMS Reply To Issue

RE: JMS Reply To Issue

by antoine.borg :: Rate this Message:

Reply to Author | View in Thread

Hi,

Would the transformFirst attribute on the router help in this case? I'm not
sure if all routers have this attribute though ...

A


Antoine Borg, Senior Consultant | Tel: +32 28 504 696
ricston Ltd., BP 2, 1180 Uccle, Brussels, BELGIUM
email: antoine.borg@... | blog: blog.ricston.com | web: ricston.com

-----Original Message-----
From: Richard Holt [mailto:richard_holt@...]
Sent: Wednesday, November 19, 2008 12:24 PM
To: user@...
Subject: Re: [mule-user] JMS Reply To Issue


Unfortunately even though the test scenario now works it isn't working in my
application.

Inbound Transformers run after a ReplyToHandler is set by SEDAService, so i
cannot intercept and remove the ReplyTo set by Mule A from within Mule B.

Is there anything which runs prior to the call to construct this
ReplyToHandler which i can use to strip the headers?

Regards,

Richard
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/JMS-Reply-To-Issue-tp20562821p20577852.html
Sent from the Mule - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from this list, please visit:

    http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email



---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from this list, please visit:

    http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email


 « Return to Thread: JMS Reply To Issue