RE: JMS Reply To Issue

Hi Antoine,

I have finally realised what i was doing wrong. Essentially i didnt want our system to use remoteSync, instead i needed synchronous. The behaviour i was seeing from the Mule system A and B was perfectly correct.

i.e. for remoteSync

Server A posts to B and awaits a response for 3 seconds. Which is generated by the services in B. I however took to long in B for the response to get back.

In addition i realised that i was more interested in simply posting the message and not put an assumption in place that B is actually present. So instead i post to the AMQ broker sitting between the two but with synchronous=true.

So thanks for everyone's help, it was simply my understanding which wasn't quite correct. Wood for the trees and all that.

Richard