|
»
»
« Return to Thread: Synergy with OpenXava
RE: Lazy Fetches
by nhhockeyplayer
::
Rate this Message:
Dude,
I made similar commits to customer. And been let down sweat/hurt. Especially after driving development fruitfully for 2 years and then blessed by being booted off project.
Does this mean trails is bad? Absolutely not. Moreso mgt...
Trails 1.0, 1.1 is a toy. Not for commercial usage. I see no lazy support or post redirect features and detached collections are broke.
Best bet is get to 1.2 asap. I am using it now and happy to coach you to the best stable running base.
If you already built your database, then you are special... and the first to pioneer the first actual trails data migration.
Don't give up...
Best regards
Ken in nashua
> Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2008 15:47:48 +0200
> From: superoverdrive@...
> To: users@...
> Subject: Re: RE: [trails-users] Lazy Fetches
>
> I have currently done a project for a customer and I can not "finish" it off and give it out to the customer due to performance issues as half the database is loaded into memory...the whole object graph is loaded even when it is not used. To me this would be quite urgent.
>
> How do you all live with Trails without lazy fetches? Have you all done some "custom" bug fixes or are your application not using many related database objects?
>
> -------- Original-Nachricht --------
> > Datum: Tue, 29 Apr 2008 09:28:49 -0400
> > Von: Ken in nashua <nhhockeyplayer@...>
> > An: users@...
> > Betreff: RE: [trails-users] Lazy Fetches
>
> >
> > 1.2 has some corner cases that I have to override custom to keep it air
> > tight. The 1.1 and 1.2 persistence models have a resemblance. The new model
> > has shown to be a bit more flexible in resolving use cases. I would probably
> > prepare for no action since 1.1 has been left behind.
> >
> > Best regards
> >
> > Ken in nashua
> >
> >
> >
> > > Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2008 12:45:05 +0200
> > > From: superoverdrive@...
> > > To: users@...
> > > Subject: [trails-users] Lazy Fetches
> > >
> > > Would it be possible to support Lazy Fetches in trails 1.1? (an update?)
> > > Or would those changes take too long so the time is better invested in
> > working on trails 1.2 ?
> > >
> > >
> > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > To unsubscribe from this list, please visit:
> > >
> > > http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email
> > >
> > >
> >
> > _________________________________________________________________
> > Make i'm yours. Create a custom banner to support your cause.
> > http://im.live.com/Messenger/IM/Contribute/Default.aspx?source=TXT_TAGHM_MSN_Make_IM_Yours
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe from this list, please visit:
>
> http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email
>
>
Make i'm yours. Create a custom banner to support your cause.
I made similar commits to customer. And been let down sweat/hurt. Especially after driving development fruitfully for 2 years and then blessed by being booted off project.
Does this mean trails is bad? Absolutely not. Moreso mgt...
Trails 1.0, 1.1 is a toy. Not for commercial usage. I see no lazy support or post redirect features and detached collections are broke.
Best bet is get to 1.2 asap. I am using it now and happy to coach you to the best stable running base.
If you already built your database, then you are special... and the first to pioneer the first actual trails data migration.
Don't give up...
Best regards
Ken in nashua
> Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2008 15:47:48 +0200
> From: superoverdrive@...
> To: users@...
> Subject: Re: RE: [trails-users] Lazy Fetches
>
> I have currently done a project for a customer and I can not "finish" it off and give it out to the customer due to performance issues as half the database is loaded into memory...the whole object graph is loaded even when it is not used. To me this would be quite urgent.
>
> How do you all live with Trails without lazy fetches? Have you all done some "custom" bug fixes or are your application not using many related database objects?
>
> -------- Original-Nachricht --------
> > Datum: Tue, 29 Apr 2008 09:28:49 -0400
> > Von: Ken in nashua <nhhockeyplayer@...>
> > An: users@...
> > Betreff: RE: [trails-users] Lazy Fetches
>
> >
> > 1.2 has some corner cases that I have to override custom to keep it air
> > tight. The 1.1 and 1.2 persistence models have a resemblance. The new model
> > has shown to be a bit more flexible in resolving use cases. I would probably
> > prepare for no action since 1.1 has been left behind.
> >
> > Best regards
> >
> > Ken in nashua
> >
> >
> >
> > > Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2008 12:45:05 +0200
> > > From: superoverdrive@...
> > > To: users@...
> > > Subject: [trails-users] Lazy Fetches
> > >
> > > Would it be possible to support Lazy Fetches in trails 1.1? (an update?)
> > > Or would those changes take too long so the time is better invested in
> > working on trails 1.2 ?
> > >
> > >
> > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > To unsubscribe from this list, please visit:
> > >
> > > http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email
> > >
> > >
> >
> > _________________________________________________________________
> > Make i'm yours. Create a custom banner to support your cause.
> > http://im.live.com/Messenger/IM/Contribute/Default.aspx?source=TXT_TAGHM_MSN_Make_IM_Yours
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe from this list, please visit:
>
> http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email
>
>
Make i'm yours. Create a custom banner to support your cause.
Best regards
Ken in nashua
Ken in nashua
« Return to Thread: Synergy with OpenXava
| Free embeddable forum powered by Nabble | Forum Help |
