Even if you need billions of rows, are you sure you want that in an
embedded database? I'm the biggest fan of Derby I know, but if I'd say
if you're talking about accessing possibly terabytes of data, maybe you
should spring for a complete industrial strength RDBMS.
ry
>
> Billions of rows?
>
> Sounds like you'll need to rethink your design.
>
> Sure you can do it, but how efficient will it be?
>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Tim Troup [mailto:
tim.troup@...]
> > Sent: Tuesday, February 20, 2007 6:55 AM
> > To: Derby Discussion
> > Subject: Limit on number of rows a table can hold?
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > Is there a limit on the number of rows a table can hold?
> > I am planning on using derby as the RDBMS for a system that will
> > require tables to hold billions of rows.
> >
> > Thanks, Tim
>
>
>
>
