« Return to Thread: Mule 2.x Stability

RE: Mule 2.x Stability

by PawanModi :: Rate this Message:

Hello Antoine,

I saw the white paper your provided link for. Is there any way to publish information about the tests i performed? I wish this information will be very useful for them who hesitate to use Mule in their environment. Many people drop their plans about using mule due to lack of documentation & information.

Let me know your thoughts.

With regards,
Pawan Modi

antoine.borg wrote:

Hi Pawan,

This is great news - coupled with MuleSource's recent tests
(www.mulesource.com/solutions/Whitepaper_perf_test_results.pdf), it sounds
like those people who were hesitant to upgrade/use Mule 2 should be happy to
do so now.

Antoine

Antoine Borg, Senior Consultant | Tel: +32 28 504 696
ricston Ltd., BP 2, 1180 Uccle, Brussels, BELGIUM
email: antoine.borg@ricston.com | blog: blog.ricston.com | web: ricston.com

-----Original Message-----
From: PawanModi [mailto:modipawan8126@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, August 26, 2008 8:49 AM
To: user@mule.codehaus.org
Subject: Re: [mule-user] Mule 2.x Stability

Hello List,

I am also using Mule2.0 in my work. I am using Mule JMS transport with
OpenMQ JMS broker. My application is running on build server with Mule ESB
for more then 15 days now. I encounter no problem so far.
I dont know the performance of earlier version of Mule i.e. Mule1.4.3.

I will recommend to migrate to Mule2.x. I hope documentation will be ready
soon for Mule2.x.

Cheer,
Pawan Modi

Steve Olson wrote:
>
> We also do Mule 2.0.2 stuff in prod, about 35 different services. We
> have some small issues with stuff (email connector, FTP connector,
> WebsphereMQ non-JMS recipient patch), and not-yet-fully-explored
> behavior with XA (transaction management) and WebsphereMQ, but other
> than that it's been stable. Mule deployables (ours are wars deployed
> under Tomcat) run for months with no issues.
>
>
> Dimitar Dimitrov wrote:
>>
>> I am using Mule 2.0.1 in production environment for non-critical
>> application. I find it stable in terms that it doesn't crash
>> randomly, have memory leaks or drop messages. That said, there are
>> some rough edges and non-critical bugs/undocumented behavior, which
>> are usually easy enough to work around.
>>
>> I would recommend that you use 2.0 and save yourself the migration
>> (btw, 1.x code line is more mature, but still far from perfect ;-)
>>
>> Dimitar
>>
>
>

--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Mule-2.x-Stability-tp19034298p19156706.html
Sent from the Mule - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from this list, please visit:

http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from this list, please visit:

http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email

« Return to Thread: Mule 2.x Stability