|
»
»
« Return to Thread: Mule 2.x Stability
RE: Mule 2.x Stability
by antoine.borg
::
Rate this Message:
Hello Pawan,
If you have run tests and wish to publish the information, I suggest the
following:
1) Post the results here. That way anyone who already uses Mule and this
list will see them.
2) If you like, I could put those figures into a blog post on my blog:
http://blog.ricston.com. If you have a blog of your own, perhaps that may be
a better place for them.
3) Another suitable location would be to write up a short article and
publish it through www.theserverside.com which would probably reach a wider
audience.
I suggest all 3 of the above to get the widest coverage of the good news.
A
Antoine Borg, Senior Consultant | Tel: +32 28 504 696
ricston Ltd., BP 2, 1180 Uccle, Brussels, BELGIUM
email: antoine.borg@... | blog: blog.ricston.com | web: ricston.com
-----Original Message-----
From: PawanModi [mailto:modipawan8126@...]
Sent: Thursday, September 04, 2008 5:32 AM
To: user@...
Subject: RE: [mule-user] Mule 2.x Stability
Hello Antoine,
I saw the white paper your provided link for. Is there any way to publish
information about the tests i performed? I wish this information will be
very useful for them who hesitate to use Mule in their environment. Many
people drop their plans about using mule due to lack of documentation &
information.
Let me know your thoughts.
With regards,
Pawan Modi
antoine.borg wrote:
>
> Hi Pawan,
>
> This is great news - coupled with MuleSource's recent tests
> (www.mulesource.com/solutions/Whitepaper_perf_test_results.pdf), it
> sounds like those people who were hesitant to upgrade/use Mule 2
> should be happy to do so now.
>
> Antoine
>
>
> Antoine Borg, Senior Consultant | Tel: +32 28 504 696 ricston Ltd., BP
> 2, 1180 Uccle, Brussels, BELGIUM
> email: antoine.borg@... | blog: blog.ricston.com | web:
> ricston.com
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: PawanModi [mailto:modipawan8126@...]
> Sent: Tuesday, August 26, 2008 8:49 AM
> To: user@...
> Subject: Re: [mule-user] Mule 2.x Stability
>
>
> Hello List,
>
> I am also using Mule2.0 in my work. I am using Mule JMS transport with
> OpenMQ JMS broker. My application is running on build server with
> Mule ESB for more then 15 days now. I encounter no problem so far.
> I dont know the performance of earlier version of Mule i.e. Mule1.4.3.
>
> I will recommend to migrate to Mule2.x. I hope documentation will be
> ready soon for Mule2.x.
>
> Cheer,
> Pawan Modi
>
>
>
> Steve Olson wrote:
>>
>> We also do Mule 2.0.2 stuff in prod, about 35 different services. We
>> have some small issues with stuff (email connector, FTP connector,
>> WebsphereMQ non-JMS recipient patch), and not-yet-fully-explored
>> behavior with XA (transaction management) and WebsphereMQ, but other
>> than that it's been stable. Mule deployables (ours are wars deployed
>> under Tomcat) run for months with no issues.
>>
>>
>> Dimitar Dimitrov wrote:
>>>
>>> I am using Mule 2.0.1 in production environment for non-critical
>>> application. I find it stable in terms that it doesn't crash
>>> randomly, have memory leaks or drop messages. That said, there are
>>> some rough edges and non-critical bugs/undocumented behavior, which
>>> are usually easy enough to work around.
>>>
>>> I would recommend that you use 2.0 and save yourself the migration
>>> (btw, 1.x code line is more mature, but still far from perfect ;-)
>>>
>>> Dimitar
>>>
>>
>>
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://www.nabble.com/Mule-2.x-Stability-tp19034298p19156706.html
> Sent from the Mule - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe from this list, please visit:
>
> http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email
>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe from this list, please visit:
>
> http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email
>
>
>
>
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Mule-2.x-Stability-tp19034298p19302737.html
Sent from the Mule - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from this list, please visit:
http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from this list, please visit:
http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email
If you have run tests and wish to publish the information, I suggest the
following:
1) Post the results here. That way anyone who already uses Mule and this
list will see them.
2) If you like, I could put those figures into a blog post on my blog:
http://blog.ricston.com. If you have a blog of your own, perhaps that may be
a better place for them.
3) Another suitable location would be to write up a short article and
publish it through www.theserverside.com which would probably reach a wider
audience.
I suggest all 3 of the above to get the widest coverage of the good news.
A
Antoine Borg, Senior Consultant | Tel: +32 28 504 696
ricston Ltd., BP 2, 1180 Uccle, Brussels, BELGIUM
email: antoine.borg@... | blog: blog.ricston.com | web: ricston.com
-----Original Message-----
From: PawanModi [mailto:modipawan8126@...]
Sent: Thursday, September 04, 2008 5:32 AM
To: user@...
Subject: RE: [mule-user] Mule 2.x Stability
Hello Antoine,
I saw the white paper your provided link for. Is there any way to publish
information about the tests i performed? I wish this information will be
very useful for them who hesitate to use Mule in their environment. Many
people drop their plans about using mule due to lack of documentation &
information.
Let me know your thoughts.
With regards,
Pawan Modi
antoine.borg wrote:
>
> Hi Pawan,
>
> This is great news - coupled with MuleSource's recent tests
> (www.mulesource.com/solutions/Whitepaper_perf_test_results.pdf), it
> sounds like those people who were hesitant to upgrade/use Mule 2
> should be happy to do so now.
>
> Antoine
>
>
> Antoine Borg, Senior Consultant | Tel: +32 28 504 696 ricston Ltd., BP
> 2, 1180 Uccle, Brussels, BELGIUM
> email: antoine.borg@... | blog: blog.ricston.com | web:
> ricston.com
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: PawanModi [mailto:modipawan8126@...]
> Sent: Tuesday, August 26, 2008 8:49 AM
> To: user@...
> Subject: Re: [mule-user] Mule 2.x Stability
>
>
> Hello List,
>
> I am also using Mule2.0 in my work. I am using Mule JMS transport with
> OpenMQ JMS broker. My application is running on build server with
> Mule ESB for more then 15 days now. I encounter no problem so far.
> I dont know the performance of earlier version of Mule i.e. Mule1.4.3.
>
> I will recommend to migrate to Mule2.x. I hope documentation will be
> ready soon for Mule2.x.
>
> Cheer,
> Pawan Modi
>
>
>
> Steve Olson wrote:
>>
>> We also do Mule 2.0.2 stuff in prod, about 35 different services. We
>> have some small issues with stuff (email connector, FTP connector,
>> WebsphereMQ non-JMS recipient patch), and not-yet-fully-explored
>> behavior with XA (transaction management) and WebsphereMQ, but other
>> than that it's been stable. Mule deployables (ours are wars deployed
>> under Tomcat) run for months with no issues.
>>
>>
>> Dimitar Dimitrov wrote:
>>>
>>> I am using Mule 2.0.1 in production environment for non-critical
>>> application. I find it stable in terms that it doesn't crash
>>> randomly, have memory leaks or drop messages. That said, there are
>>> some rough edges and non-critical bugs/undocumented behavior, which
>>> are usually easy enough to work around.
>>>
>>> I would recommend that you use 2.0 and save yourself the migration
>>> (btw, 1.x code line is more mature, but still far from perfect ;-)
>>>
>>> Dimitar
>>>
>>
>>
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://www.nabble.com/Mule-2.x-Stability-tp19034298p19156706.html
> Sent from the Mule - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe from this list, please visit:
>
> http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email
>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe from this list, please visit:
>
> http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email
>
>
>
>
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Mule-2.x-Stability-tp19034298p19302737.html
Sent from the Mule - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from this list, please visit:
http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from this list, please visit:
http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email
« Return to Thread: Mule 2.x Stability
| Free embeddable forum powered by Nabble | Forum Help |
