
Some parts of this message have been removed.
Learn more about Nabble's
security policy.
Last week I attended to an Ed Hammond's talk in Argentina, and in his presentation he mention a new concept to reach true interoperability: the data element.
Please see page 13-14: http://www.hospitalitaliano.org.ar/archivos/noticias_archivos/11/Jornadas2011/11_11.01-03-Hammond-Interoperability-BuenosAires.pdf
I asked him why this sounds so much like openEHR archetypes and why don't reuse this concept instead of creating a new one (or at least renaming it). He told me "everyone want his own standard", that was very sad.
Besides that, what I see (and many people on that room that know what is an archetype) is a validation of an important figure on HL7 that archetypes work, do the job, and are necessary for interoperability. So, I think HL7 is very interested on archetypes right now.
I hope that soon Mr. Hammond could do a presentation on standarization that show the best of the breed instead of reinventing/renaming the wheel.
-- Kind regards,Ing. Pablo Pazos GutiérrezLinkedIn: http://uy.linkedin.com/in/pablopazosgutierrezBlog: http://informatica-medica.blogspot.com/Twitter: http://twitter.com/ppazos> Date: Mon, 7 Nov 2011 11:10:55 +0000
> From:
thomas.beale@...> To:
openehr-clinical@...> Subject: Re: Serialisation of openEHR Models
>
> On 07/11/2011 10:49, Diego Boscá wrote:
> > I am talking about model serialization: use ADL to express CDA and
> > greenCDA (over their own model) as we do with openEHR ADL archetypes
>
> well ADL is designed to serialise any 2nd or higher order model based on
> any RM. So creating an archetype based on a CDA RM can be done. I first
> built HL7-based archetypes in 2003, but HL7 were not interested.
>
> - thomas
_______________________________________________
openEHR-clinical mailing list
openEHR-clinical@...
http://lists.chime.ucl.ac.uk/mailman/listinfo/openehr-clinical