« Return to Thread: Shameless self-promotion but FYI

RE: Shameless self-promotion but FYI

by John Klasey :: Rate this Message:

Reply to Author | View in Thread

Andy:
"Late 20th Century" would have been a better choice and less subject to
misinterpretation (and accusations of premature aging).
Jack Klasey

-----Original Message-----
From: owner-photoforum@...
[mailto:owner-photoforum@...] On Behalf Of ADavidhazy
Sent: Monday, June 29, 2009 2:13 PM
To: List for Photo/Imaging Educators - Professionals - Students
Subject: Re: Shameless self-promotion but FYI

I was wondering about that ... does 1970 - 1999 count
as being late 1900s or am I confused - age you know.

and I REALLY would like to know ... did I make a
grammatical or other snafu with this statement?

help!

andy




wpettit@... wrote:

> "It is intended to be record of the work produced by Andrew Davidhazy in
the late 1900s."

>
> Gee Andy, We had no idea you were that old.....
>
>
> Bill
>
> -----Original Message-----
>
>>From: ADavidhazy <andpph@...>
>>Sent: Jun 29, 2009 1:10 PM
>>To: List for Photo/Imaging Educators - Professionals - Students
<photoforum@...>
>>Subject: Shameless self-promotion but FYI
>>
>>Published a vanity press, illustrated, Lulu book on the Phoenix Process.
>>
>>http://www.lulu.com/content/paperback-book/fleeting-phoenix-figures/399430
6
>>
>>Andy
>>
>
>

 « Return to Thread: Shameless self-promotion but FYI