« Return to Thread: Streblospio shrubsol..ei..ii
Dear all,
Hekaterobranchus shrubsolii Buchanan,
1890, was published after the “British Association Code” of 1842,
but before the “Regles internationales de la Nomenclature
zoologique” of 1905 and the first edition of the “International
Code of Zoological Nomenclature” (1961). One could argue, therefore, that
Buchanan was not formally bound by any rules when she erected the name.
Personally, I am in favour of stability in nomenclature. Changing the
name of a species from H. shrubsolii
to H. shrubsolei after 118 years
would mean that inexperienced people looking up the new version on the internet
might miss most of the available information for the species. Also, the way I
read the rules, they say that the name should not change.
If the name were to be erected today, it would certainly come under
rule 31.1.2 of the fourth edition of the “International Code of
Zoological Nomenclature” (1999), which points to the name being shrubsolei (although the example given in
Article 31 suggests the original author of the name could drop the letter e if she wanted).
However, Article 32.5 lists “Spellings
that must be corrected”, and this case is not covered therein
(Incorrect ………… latinization
………… not to be considered inadvertent errors).
Article 33 states “The correction of an incorrect original
spelling in accordance with Article 32.5 is a justified emendation
……………………… Any other
emendation is an unjustified emendation ……………………”.
So, even though nowadays it would count as an “incorrect original
spelling”, my opinion is that it should not be changed. I hope this
helps!
Alex Muir.
P.S. Changing the subject slightly, Hartmann-Schroder synonymised Streblospio shrubsolii of Fauvel (1927),
Friedrich (1940), Hartmann-Schroder (1971) and Kirkegaard (1996) with Streblospio benedicti Webster, 1879.
Mr. A.I. Muir
Polychaete Research Group, Department of Zoology, The Natural History
Museum, Cromwell Road, South Kensington, LONDON SW7 5BD, UNITED KINGDOM
Tel: +44 (0)20 7942 5567 Fax: +44 (0)20 7942
5054
http://www.nhm.ac.uk//research-curation/staff-directory/zoology/cv-5565.html
-----Original Message-----
From: annelida-bounces@...
[mailto:annelida-bounces@...] On Behalf Of Vasily Radashevsky
Sent: 10 May 2008 10:11
To:
Subject: [Annelida] Streblospio shrubsol..ei..ii
Dear all,
Buchanan (1890) described new spionid worms from
"shrubsolii", with double "i" at
the end, has widely been accepted by taxonomists and was also spelled this way
by Olga Hartman (1959) in her "Catalogue of the Polychaetous Annelids of
the World".
My question is should we continue using this
incorrect spelling or change the name to "shrubsolei", as it is
required by the ICZN?
Waiting for opinions!
Vasily Radashevsky
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Streblospio-shrubsol..ei..ii-tp17161354p17161354.html
Sent from the Bio.net - Annelida mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
_______________________________________________
Annelida mailing list
Post: Annelida@...
Help/archive: http://www.bio.net/biomail/listinfo/annelida
Resources: http://www.annelida.net
« Return to Thread: Streblospio shrubsol..ei..ii
| Free embeddable forum powered by Nabble | Forum Help |