« Return to Thread: anyone looked at Chameleon closely?

RE: anyone looked at Chameleon closely?

by Chris Williams-9 :: Rate this Message:

Reply to Author | View in Thread

Guess I don't understand why you wouldn't want to own up to its WP
roots, though.  Imagine being able to say "based on code in use by over
300,000 sites".  Or "core engine tested by millions of users every day".
Or "core engine proven to handle some of the largest sites around".

Seems to me that by trying to hide their WP roots they are only hurting
themselves.  I think "proudly based on WordPress" would have a whole lot
more meaning, market-push, etc.  And it wouldn't get all the rest of the
WP fanatics (like me) wanting to puke.

As it is, I don't know how they sleep at night...

Just my $0.02,
Chris

-----Original Message-----
From: David Chait
Subject: Re: [wp-hackers] anyone looked at Chameleon closely?

| Gotta give them props, though.
_______________________________________________
wp-hackers mailing list
wp-hackers@...
http://lists.automattic.com/mailman/listinfo/wp-hackers

 « Return to Thread: anyone looked at Chameleon closely?