|
»
RE: jdom-interest Digest, Vol 52, Issue 1
|
View:
New views
1 Messages
—
Rating Filter:
Alert me
|
 |
RE: jdom-interest Digest, Vol 52, Issue 1
by Pete Keyes
::
Rate this Message:
Your problem w/ XInclude is the sax parser, not jdom. Jdom knows nothing about XInclude - Xerces or whatever sax parser you use owns that knowledge.
....Pete -----Original Message----- From: "jdom-interest-request@..." <jdom-interest-request@...> To: "jdom-interest@..." <jdom-interest@...> Sent: 3/21/2009 12:49 PM Subject: jdom-interest Digest, Vol 52, Issue 1 Send jdom-interest mailing list submissions to jdom-interest@... To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit http://www.jdom.org/mailman/listinfo/jdom-interest or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to jdom-interest-request@... You can reach the person managing the list at jdom-interest-owner@... When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific than "Re: Contents of jdom-interest digest..." Today's Topics: 1. xinclude and jdom? (Georg) 2. XML Element name Verifier is overly strict and doesn't match current XML 1.0 REC (Klotz, Leigh) 3. Testing the list (Jason Hunter) 4. Test #2 (Jason Hunter) 5. Test Mailing List (Bradley S. Huffman) 6. testing the list (Ethan Burnside) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Message: 1 Date: Fri, 6 Mar 2009 16:24:59 +0100 From: Georg <gwk.rko@...> Subject: [jdom-interest] xinclude and jdom? To: jdom-interest@... Message-ID: <5b9e71800903060724k6feafa37id365f113b4847fb1@...> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Hi, I tried getting xinclude to work with jdom, but failed. On referencing the xinclude namespace like this in my root tag: <myroottag xmlns:xi="xmlns:xi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XInclude"> the parser took 'xmlns:xi' as an attribute, and consequently failed validation :( I also tried with validation turned off, but then it didn't recognize the real include, <xi:include href="somewhere.xml"/> instead it parsed 'xi:include' as a regular element :( What's wrong here? -- Regards, Georg. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://www.jdom.org/pipermail/jdom-interest/attachments/20090306/3e8f962e/attachment-0001.htm ------------------------------ Message: 2 Date: Thu, 19 Mar 2009 14:50:34 -0700 From: "Klotz, Leigh" <Leigh.Klotz@...> Subject: [jdom-interest] XML Element name Verifier is overly strict and doesn't match current XML 1.0 REC To: <jdom-interest@...> Message-ID: <E254B0A7E0268949ABFE5EA97B7D0CF4074DF21E@...> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" JDOM 1.1 won't create elements whose characters are in the following ranges: Unicode 0xFF41-0xFF5A (FULLWIDTH LATIN SMALL LETTER A to FULLWIDTH LATIN SMALL LETTER Z) Unicode 0xFF21-0xFF3A (FULLWIDTH LATIN CAPITAL LETTER A to FULLWIDTH LATIN CAPITAL LETTER Z) The JDOM 1.1 source for org.jdom.Verifier.isXMLLetter cites production 84 of the XML 1.0 Recommendation for its table of allowed characters. However, according to http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-xml/ the whole of Appendix B (which contains Production 84) is obsolete and is not used within the recommendation. The XML Rec instead uses production [4] for NameStartChar and [5] for NameChar. The productions at [4] and [5] are considerably smaller than those of Appendix B, and are more inclusive, providing for greater utility in I18N applications of XML. Furthermore, according to http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-xml/ Appendix J (Non-Normative), the characters I menition above are not only allowed, but encouraged for use in XML Names, because the Unicode ID_Start property and ID_Continue of these Unicode code points is True. The XML REC says: 1. The first character of any name should have a Unicode property of ID_Start, or else be '_' #x5F. 2. Characters other than the first should have a Unicode property of ID_Continue, or ... You can see that ID_Start and ID_Continue are True on the individual pages for the small letters here: http://unicode.org/cldr/utility/character.jsp?a=FF41 to http://unicode.org/cldr/utility/character.jsp?a=FF5A I recommend that org.jdom.Verifier.isXMLLetter be updated to use production [4], [4a], and [5] of XML 1.0 Fifth Edition. It's quite likely that some of the other character class verifiers need updating as well, but I didn't examine them. Leigh. ------------------------------ Message: 3 Date: Thu, 19 Mar 2009 16:41:32 -0700 From: Jason Hunter <jhunter@...> Subject: [jdom-interest] Testing the list To: jdom interest <jdom-interest@...> Message-ID: <21093358-EF5D-46DD-9159-DA3279B71DBC@...> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed It appears we have a list problem. Testing. -jh- ------------------------------ Message: 4 Date: Thu, 19 Mar 2009 19:22:22 -0700 From: Jason Hunter <jhunter@...> Subject: [jdom-interest] Test #2 To: jdom interest <jdom-interest@...> Message-ID: <34484948-8987-4ADD-B641-5D3A543C2B5C@...> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Working to unstick the list. Here's a second test. -jh- ------------------------------ Message: 5 Date: Fri, 20 Mar 2009 11:33:55 -0500 From: "Bradley S. Huffman" <hip@...> Subject: [jdom-interest] Test Mailing List To: jdom-interest@... Cc: hip@... Message-ID: <20090320163355.367F2154C55@...> >From the xml-dev mailing list: > JDOM is pretty mature and I've been happy with it for a couple of years > now. > But I remain worried that the JDOM mailing list is broken. =20 > We can't even know how many messages and bug reports were lost, and it > doesn't bode well for the future. Let's just see if it's broken. Brad ------------------------------ Message: 6 Date: Fri, 20 Mar 2009 16:39:52 -0700 From: Ethan Burnside <burnside@...> Subject: [jdom-interest] testing the list To: jdom-interest@... Message-ID: <49C42948.7020709@...> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed testing the list -- -------------------------------------------------- Ethan Burnside - Principal, Kattare I/S Email: burnside@... Web: http://www.kattare.com Phone: 1.877.KATTARE FAQ: http://www.kattare.com/docs/faq_browse.kvws -------------------------------------------------- ------------------------------ _______________________________________________ To control your jdom-interest membership: http://www.jdom.org/mailman/options/jdom-interest/youraddr@... End of jdom-interest Digest, Vol 52, Issue 1 ******************************************** _______________________________________________ To control your jdom-interest membership: http://www.jdom.org/mailman/options/jdom-interest/youraddr@... |
| Free embeddable forum powered by Nabble | Forum Help |
