RE: something like Clojure's "doto"?

> The second I guess would be the more correct but it forces
> client side import. Ideally, one should be able to abstract
> it away, e.g.
>
> doto(x) { //no additional boilerplate
>  foo(1) // calls x.foo(1)
>  bar(2) // calls x.bar(2)
> }


Hmmm. That would allow for the following?

class MyClass {

  def someMethod(f: =>Unit) {
     doto(this) f
  }

  def otherMethod() { ... }
}

val x = new MyClass()

x.someMethod {  
    otherMethod()
}


If yes, that would be the answer (or better: it is the same question)
for thread "Question on DSL", because that resembles the Groovy
closure delegate feature. It would be great for creating
builder based DSLs.

KR
Det