Wouldn't that infer that the component has to have generics, or am I
missing something here?
Something like...
public abstract class Component<M extends IModel<T>, T> implements
IClusterable, IConverterLocator {
...
public final M getModel(){
...
}
...
public final T getModelObject(){
...
}
...
}
-----Original Message-----
From: Jan Kriesten [mailto:
jan.kriesten@...]
Sent: Monday, June 02, 2008 12:03 PM
To:
users@...
Subject: Re: users, please give us your opinion: what is your take on
generics with Wicket
Hi Sebastian,
> What about getModel()? If componennt is not generified I'm really
> wondering if the there is any benefit to generics at all... (I do
> really think it will spawn lots of questions on the list as well).
what's the problem with getModel? If you specialize on a certain
Component, you can implement T getModel() ?
Regards, --- Jan.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
users-unsubscribe@...
For additional commands, e-mail:
users-help@...
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
users-unsubscribe@...
For additional commands, e-mail:
users-help@...
