|
»
»
»
« Return to Thread: webdav wagon changes
RE: webdav wagon changes
by Brian E Fox
::
Rate this Message:
I agree a single provider is less confusing. What if jackrabbit is the trunk and we make slide a branch? If the api hasn't changed, then it should be ok.
-----Original Message-----
From: nbeyer@... [mailto:nbeyer@...] On Behalf Of Nathan Beyer
Sent: Tuesday, May 20, 2008 10:26 AM
To: wagon-dev@...
Subject: Re: webdav wagon changes
I'd prefer a single 'webdav' provider. If there are concerns of passivity or
correctness, then I'd suggest a call out for help testing it, which could
identify any possible regressions. The slide-impl is pretty bad and I'd be
willing to live and work through any bumps for a long-term win.
If there's a SNAPSHOT or a way of building one and some quick instructions
on how to replace the slide impl in 2.0.9, I'd certainly be able to start
some larger-scale integration testing.
-Nathan
On Tue, May 20, 2008 at 12:43 AM, Brett Porter <brett@...> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I just finished some work to migrate the webdav provider from slide to
> jackrabbit using the patch from James Dumay. Slide leaked some file handles
> and is an unsupported project. In the process I added some more tests around
> transfer listeners as some providers weren't registering them correctly.
>
> Jason suggested on IRC that it might be better to retain the slide webdav
> provider as-is and move the new code to wagon-webdav-jackrabbit.
>
> Any opinions on this before I go ahead and do that?
>
> I'm thinking of still renaming the slide wagon to wagon-webdav-slide in
> such a case, so that on upgrading the version they are forced to choose, but
> still have access to the slide one if needed.
>
> The only issue I can see is it clashing with the other one built in to
> 2.0.9 for the plexus 'dav' component, but I haven't tried to see if it wins
> out correctly if used.
>
> BTW, I've also brought the SCM provider in to trunk from the sandbox - it's
> apparent from JIRA that a number of people are using it, so I think we
> should support it for the limited use cases it currently supports.
>
> Cheers,
> Brett
>
> --
> Brett Porter
> brett@...
> http://blogs.exist.com/bporter/
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: wagon-dev-unsubscribe@...
> For additional commands, e-mail: wagon-dev-help@...
>
>
-----Original Message-----
From: nbeyer@... [mailto:nbeyer@...] On Behalf Of Nathan Beyer
Sent: Tuesday, May 20, 2008 10:26 AM
To: wagon-dev@...
Subject: Re: webdav wagon changes
I'd prefer a single 'webdav' provider. If there are concerns of passivity or
correctness, then I'd suggest a call out for help testing it, which could
identify any possible regressions. The slide-impl is pretty bad and I'd be
willing to live and work through any bumps for a long-term win.
If there's a SNAPSHOT or a way of building one and some quick instructions
on how to replace the slide impl in 2.0.9, I'd certainly be able to start
some larger-scale integration testing.
-Nathan
On Tue, May 20, 2008 at 12:43 AM, Brett Porter <brett@...> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I just finished some work to migrate the webdav provider from slide to
> jackrabbit using the patch from James Dumay. Slide leaked some file handles
> and is an unsupported project. In the process I added some more tests around
> transfer listeners as some providers weren't registering them correctly.
>
> Jason suggested on IRC that it might be better to retain the slide webdav
> provider as-is and move the new code to wagon-webdav-jackrabbit.
>
> Any opinions on this before I go ahead and do that?
>
> I'm thinking of still renaming the slide wagon to wagon-webdav-slide in
> such a case, so that on upgrading the version they are forced to choose, but
> still have access to the slide one if needed.
>
> The only issue I can see is it clashing with the other one built in to
> 2.0.9 for the plexus 'dav' component, but I haven't tried to see if it wins
> out correctly if used.
>
> BTW, I've also brought the SCM provider in to trunk from the sandbox - it's
> apparent from JIRA that a number of people are using it, so I think we
> should support it for the limited use cases it currently supports.
>
> Cheers,
> Brett
>
> --
> Brett Porter
> brett@...
> http://blogs.exist.com/bporter/
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: wagon-dev-unsubscribe@...
> For additional commands, e-mail: wagon-dev-help@...
>
>
« Return to Thread: webdav wagon changes
| Free embeddable forum powered by Nabble | Forum Help |
