-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
David Kreiss wrote:
> A DM=CPU should tell the story.
[...]
> If the D M=CPU under Hercules doesn't show these as the
> correct processor types the results would be as seen.
And therein is the problem: the D M=CPU display does show the "+I"
for processor 7, but yet their total chargeable time isn't any less.
Their total time is the same whether a zIIP is defined in Hercules or
not.
On a real machine they're different. On a real machine with a zIIP
the chargeable time ("SRB time" I think they called it?) is very
small, leading them to confidently conclude their program/workload is
indeed running on the zIIP, but on Hercules, whether a zIIP is define
or not makes no difference: the chargeable time is always the full
amount! (even though as I explained it appears as if the o/s does
know the zIIP exists since it's appearing properly in the D M=CPU
display).
The big question is WHY this behavior occurs? What is Hercules doing
wrong?
Or are they doing something wrong? Do they need to configure
something in the o/s that they possibly forgot to do?
Where should I start looking?
TIA
- --
"Fish" (David B. Trout) -
fish@...
Fight Spam! Join CAUCE! <
http://www.cauce.org/>
7 reasons why HTML email is a bad thing
http://www.georgedillon.com/web/html_email_is_evil.shtmlPGP key fingerprints:
RSA: 6B37 7110 7201 9917 9B0D 99E3 55DB 5D58 FADE 4A52
DH/DSS: 9F9B BAB0 BA7F C458 1A89 FE26 48F5 D7F4 C4EE 3E2A
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGP 8.1
iQA/AwUBSkD8Zkj11/TE7j4qEQIfoQCeLunlZ9JXC8gjmZlMFSvvSA+cPWcAoOwb
9tLpeEEOEPeMHOnRIpO2WMY5
=YCHk
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
