|
View:
New views
4 Messages
—
Rating Filter:
Alert me
|
|
|
RFS: colorcodeDear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "colorcode". * Package name : colorcode Version : 0.5.5-1 Upstream Author : Dirk Laebisch <dirk@...> * URL : http://colorcode.laebisch.com/ * License : GPL-3 Section : games It builds these binary packages: colorcode - advanced clone of the MasterMind code-breaking game The package appears to be lintian clean. The upload would fix these bugs: 553622 My motivation for maintaining this package is simply that this implementation of the MasterMind code-breaking game is, in my opinion, very good (and I've been looking for such a software since a pretty long time). I am using this program all the time and thus, I reason, others might enjoy it in the Debian GNU/Linux distro. The package can be found on mentors.debian.net: - URL: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/c/colorcode - Source repository: deb-src http://mentors.debian.net/debian unstable - main contrib non-free - dget - http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/c/colorcode/colorcode_0.5.5-1.dsc I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me. Best regards, Filippo -- Filippo Rusconi, PhD - CNRS - public key C78F687C Author of ``massXpert'' at http://www.massxpert.org |
|
|
Re: RFS: colorcodeOn Thu, Nov 05, 2009 at 11:22:42PM +0100, Filippo Rusconi wrote:
> I am looking for a sponsor for my package "colorcode". > * Package name : colorcode > Version : 0.5.5-1 > Upstream Author : Dirk Laebisch <dirk@...> > * URL : http://colorcode.laebisch.com/ > * License : GPL-3 > Section : games usr/share/pixmaps/colorcode32.xpm: neither gqview nor xli shows it reasonably. xli complains with error messages like Bad color name '#A7ADAD00' debian/rules: - $(MAKE) clean The space after "-" keeps lintian from detecting this, but W: colorcode source: debian-rules-ignores-make-clean-error line 32 N: N: A rule in the debian/rules file for this package calls the package's N: clean or distclean target with a line like: N: N: -$(MAKE) distclean N: or N: $(MAKE) -i distclean N: N: The leading "-" or the option -i tells make to ignore all errors. N: Normally this is done for packages using Autoconf since Makefile may not N: exist. However, this line ignores all other error messages, not just the N: missing Makefile error. It's better to use: N: N: [ ! -f Makefile ] || $(MAKE) distclean N: N: so that other error messages from the clean or distclean rule will still N: be caught (or just remove the "-" if the package uses a static N: makefile). N: N: Severity: normal, Certainty: certain N: Except for that, it looks OK. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-REQUEST@... with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@... |
|
|
Re: RFS: colorcodeHello, Lionel,
thanks for caring :-) On Sun, Nov 08, 2009 at 03:21:19PM +0100, Lionel Elie Mamane wrote: > > On Thu, Nov 05, 2009 at 11:22:42PM +0100, Filippo Rusconi wrote: > > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "colorcode". > > > * Package name : colorcode > > Version : 0.5.5-1 > > Upstream Author : Dirk Laebisch <dirk@...> > > * URL : http://colorcode.laebisch.com/ > > * License : GPL-3 > > Section : games > > usr/share/pixmaps/colorcode32.xpm: neither gqview nor xli shows it > reasonably. xli complains with error messages like > Bad color name '#A7ADAD00' I installed xli for the test and it ran flawlessly (displaying the pixmap as expected): $ xli /usr/share/pixmaps/colorcode32.xpm /usr/share/pixmaps/colorcode32.xpm is a 32x32 X Pixmap image (Version 3) with 229 colors titled 'colorcode__' Default gamma for IRGB image is 2.20 Compressing colormap...212 unique colors Using DirectColor visual Building XImage...done I also opened it using Gwenview and The Gimp (which is in my experience picky about file formats) without any warning/error message. I wonder what this odd behaviour is due to. Note that this xpm file is created on the fly by calling convert on a .ico file. Maybe the conversion failed, somehow ? I am attaching the file so that you may try it on your box. > > debian/rules: > > - $(MAKE) clean > > The space after "-" keeps lintian from detecting this, but > > W: colorcode source: debian-rules-ignores-make-clean-error line 32 > N: > N: A rule in the debian/rules file for this package calls the package's > N: clean or distclean target with a line like: > N: > N: -$(MAKE) distclean > N: or > N: $(MAKE) -i distclean > N: > N: The leading "-" or the option -i tells make to ignore all errors. > N: Normally this is done for packages using Autoconf since Makefile may not > N: exist. However, this line ignores all other error messages, not just the > N: missing Makefile error. It's better to use: > N: > N: [ ! -f Makefile ] || $(MAKE) distclean > N: > N: so that other error messages from the clean or distclean rule will still > N: be caught (or just remove the "-" if the package uses a static > N: makefile). > N: > N: Severity: normal, Certainty: certain > N: > Except for that, it looks OK. Great ! Please, note that the lintian -iEI --pedantic run on the package complains about the man page since one day (yesterday it did not complain at all). Apparently there is a bug in either col or man with respect to character codes depending on the encoding of the man page. Please have a look at http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=555330. I am uploading the modified package. Thanks again ! Ciao, Filippo -- Filippo Rusconi, PhD - CNRS - public key C78F687C Author of ``massXpert'' at http://www.massxpert.org |
|
|
Re: RFS: colorcodeOn Mon, Nov 09, 2009 at 11:28:08PM +0100, Filippo Rusconi wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 08, 2009 at 03:21:19PM +0100, Lionel Elie Mamane wrote: >> On Thu, Nov 05, 2009 at 11:22:42PM +0100, Filippo Rusconi wrote: >>> I am looking for a sponsor for my package "colorcode". >>> * Package name : colorcode >>> Version : 0.5.5-1 >>> Upstream Author : Dirk Laebisch <dirk@...> >>> * URL : http://colorcode.laebisch.com/ >>> * License : GPL-3 >>> Section : games >> usr/share/pixmaps/colorcode32.xpm: neither gqview nor xli shows it >> reasonably. xli complains with error messages like >> Bad color name '#A7ADAD00' > OK, this one is odd : > I installed xli for the test and it ran flawlessly (displaying the > pixmap as expected): > I wonder what this odd behaviour is due to. Probably different versions of ImageMagick. With imagemagick 7:6.3.7.9.dfsg2-1~lenny3, I get a (slightly) different results than yours (difference only visible under zoom), but an image that displays nicely. With... Ah, my other machine has graphicsmagick-imagemagick-compat and not imagemagick. Filing a bug. In the meantime, let's build-conflict on graphicsmagick-imagemagick-compat. You don't ship anything in /usr/bin, so why have that directory created (by debian/colorcode.dirs)? Ah no, actually you don't create it because you don't call dh_installdirs, but then why do you have a debian/colocode.dirs file? -- Lionel -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-REQUEST@... with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@... |
| Free embeddable forum powered by Nabble | Forum Help |