|

»

Musicbrainz - Style

RFV: DiscogsRelationshipType and pending Discogs releases

View: New views

10 Messages — Rating Filter: Alert me

	RFV: DiscogsRelationshipType and pending Discogs releases by MeinDummy :: Rate this Message: Reply to Author \| View Threaded \| Show Only this Message Hi, I propose to delete the phrase 'Do not add relationships to pending releases from Discogs. You never know if they get accepted.' from Doc: DiscogsRelationshipType and from Wiki: DiscogsRelationshipType. The RFC was posted on July 22nd and no-one objected: [mb-style] RFC: DiscogsRelationshipType and pending Discogs releases Related discussions are here: [mb-style] DiscogsRelationshipType and pending Discogs releases [mb-users] DiscogsRelationshipType and pending Discogs releases Christian (MD)
	Re: RFV: DiscogsRelationshipType and pending Discogs releases by gnu_andrew :: Rate this Message: Reply to Author \| View Threaded \| Show Only this Message 2009/8/6 MeinDummy <MeinDummy@...>: > > Hi, > > I propose to delete the phrase 'Do not add relationships to pending releases > from Discogs. You never know if they get accepted.' from > http://musicbrainz.org/doc/Discogs_Relationship_Type Doc: > DiscogsRelationshipType and from > http://wiki.musicbrainz.org/Discogs_Relationship_Type Wiki: > DiscogsRelationshipType . > > The RFC was posted on July 22nd and no-one objected: > http://lists.musicbrainz.org/pipermail/musicbrainz-style/2009-July/008150.html > [mb-style] RFC: DiscogsRelationshipType and pending Discogs releases > > Related discussions are here: > http://lists.musicbrainz.org/pipermail/musicbrainz-style/2009-July/008105.html > [mb-style] DiscogsRelationshipType and pending Discogs releases > http://lists.musicbrainz.org/pipermail/musicbrainz-users/2008-July/018209.html > [mb-users] DiscogsRelationshipType and pending Discogs releases > > Christian (MD) > > -- > View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/RFV%3A-DiscogsRelationshipType-and-pending-Discogs-releases-tp24844551p24844551.html > Sent from the Musicbrainz - Style mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > > > _______________________________________________ > Musicbrainz-style mailing list > Musicbrainz-style@... > http://lists.musicbrainz.org/mailman/listinfo/musicbrainz-style > Yes. -- Andrew :-) Free Java Software Engineer Red Hat, Inc. (http://www.redhat.com) Support Free Java! Contribute to GNU Classpath and the OpenJDK http://www.gnu.org/software/classpath http://openjdk.java.net PGP Key: 94EFD9D8 (http://subkeys.pgp.net) Fingerprint: F8EF F1EA 401E 2E60 15FA 7927 142C 2591 94EF D9D8 _______________________________________________ Musicbrainz-style mailing list Musicbrainz-style@... http://lists.musicbrainz.org/mailman/listinfo/musicbrainz-style
	Re: RFV: DiscogsRelationshipType and pending Discogs releases by Evigheden :: Rate this Message: Reply to Author \| View Threaded \| Show Only this Message -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 MeinDummy pisze: > Hi, > > I propose to delete the phrase 'Do not add relationships to pending releases > from Discogs. You never know if they get accepted.' from > http://musicbrainz.org/doc/Discogs_Relationship_Type Doc: > DiscogsRelationshipType and from > http://wiki.musicbrainz.org/Discogs_Relationship_Type Wiki: > DiscogsRelationshipType . > > The RFC was posted on July 22nd and no-one objected: > http://lists.musicbrainz.org/pipermail/musicbrainz-style/2009-July/008150.html > [mb-style] RFC: DiscogsRelationshipType and pending Discogs releases > > Related discussions are here: > http://lists.musicbrainz.org/pipermail/musicbrainz-style/2009-July/008105.html > [mb-style] DiscogsRelationshipType and pending Discogs releases > http://lists.musicbrainz.org/pipermail/musicbrainz-users/2008-July/018209.html > [mb-users] DiscogsRelationshipType and pending Discogs releases > > Christian (MD) > Yes. Krzysztof "Levittoux" Baj -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJKesJ1AAoJEN14+Ja3JH9nnTcH/jCf0+KF/TtAFvDxtOh8FuWq txEPkxenQNH2wQmeZw3oVEzjLu0GwgBx8RwwwGElAncUnzXGQ8F4n2T041iX8/c+ 4S4BGeSvaiSD47FGxbg1c6+vqOsZv9P4dKodUG0/InpmXFi83PP4qZ25cGSBbWIY nJD4g2dgC7xBBjoK3OD2AnlTrTdJ3d8mz4Jc2zq+vWbaOxpitD7D6o9y1n6Ybvjs /iotfxJ3RtQVlHxDLA5bai8OUZqqYa8dXHiCKB1qXCkIJgCPx7pAm4mgIq3G429P WqAo+WsSP4PiNLJGnrz2vWT8FVpJ+16Yz8xSl8eSg6Ka+0kCm0Koh94W9XN/ilo= =FOde -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Czy odnajde prawdziwa milosc? Zapytaj wrozke >> http://link.interia.pl/f22ae _______________________________________________ Musicbrainz-style mailing list Musicbrainz-style@... http://lists.musicbrainz.org/mailman/listinfo/musicbrainz-style
	Re: RFV: DiscogsRelationshipType and pending Discogs releases by Mark Woodson :: Rate this Message: Reply to Author \| View Threaded \| Show Only this Message On Thu, Aug 6, 2009 at 4:17 AM, MeinDummy<MeinDummy@...> wrote: > > Hi, > > I propose to delete the phrase 'Do not add relationships to pending releases > from Discogs. You never know if they get accepted.' from > http://musicbrainz.org/doc/Discogs_Relationship_Type Doc: > DiscogsRelationshipType and from > http://wiki.musicbrainz.org/Discogs_Relationship_Type Wiki: > DiscogsRelationshipType . > > The RFC was posted on July 22nd and no-one objected: > http://lists.musicbrainz.org/pipermail/musicbrainz-style/2009-July/008150.html > [mb-style] RFC: DiscogsRelationshipType and pending Discogs releases > > Related discussions are here: > http://lists.musicbrainz.org/pipermail/musicbrainz-style/2009-July/008105.html > [mb-style] DiscogsRelationshipType and pending Discogs releases > http://lists.musicbrainz.org/pipermail/musicbrainz-users/2008-July/018209.html > [mb-users] DiscogsRelationshipType and pending Discogs releases > > Christian (MD) Yes. _______________________________________________ Musicbrainz-style mailing list Musicbrainz-style@... http://lists.musicbrainz.org/mailman/listinfo/musicbrainz-style
	Re: RFV: DiscogsRelationshipType and pending Discogs releases by chabreyflint :: Rate this Message: Reply to Author \| View Threaded \| Show Only this Message +1 On Thu, Aug 6, 2009 at 4:20 PM, Mark Woodson <mark.woodson@...> wrote: On Thu, Aug 6, 2009 at 4:17 AM, MeinDummy<MeinDummy@...> wrote: > > Hi, > > I propose to delete the phrase 'Do not add relationships to pending releases > from Discogs. You never know if they get accepted.' from > http://musicbrainz.org/doc/Discogs_Relationship_Type Doc: > DiscogsRelationshipType and from > http://wiki.musicbrainz.org/Discogs_Relationship_Type Wiki: > DiscogsRelationshipType . > > The RFC was posted on July 22nd and no-one objected: > http://lists.musicbrainz.org/pipermail/musicbrainz-style/2009-July/008150.html > [mb-style] RFC: DiscogsRelationshipType and pending Discogs releases > > Related discussions are here: > http://lists.musicbrainz.org/pipermail/musicbrainz-style/2009-July/008105.html > [mb-style] DiscogsRelationshipType and pending Discogs releases > http://lists.musicbrainz.org/pipermail/musicbrainz-users/2008-July/018209.html > [mb-users] DiscogsRelationshipType and pending Discogs releases > > Christian (MD) Yes. _______________________________________________ Musicbrainz-style mailing list Musicbrainz-style@... http://lists.musicbrainz.org/mailman/listinfo/musicbrainz-style _______________________________________________ Musicbrainz-style mailing list Musicbrainz-style@... http://lists.musicbrainz.org/mailman/listinfo/musicbrainz-style
	Re: RFV: DiscogsRelationshipType and pending Discogs releases by Toni Panadès :: Rate this Message: Reply to Author \| View Threaded \| Show Only this Message 2009/8/6 MeinDummy <MeinDummy@...> The RFC was posted on July 22nd and no-one objected: http://lists.musicbrainz.org/pipermail/musicbrainz-style/2009-July/008150.html [mb-style] RFC: DiscogsRelationshipType and pending Discogs releases Yes Toni/t0n3t _______________________________________________ Musicbrainz-style mailing list Musicbrainz-style@... http://lists.musicbrainz.org/mailman/listinfo/musicbrainz-style
	Re: RFV: DiscogsRelationshipType and pending Discogs releases by Pavan Chander :: Rate this Message: Reply to Author \| View Threaded \| Show Only this Message +1 Pavan Chander // navap On Thu, Aug 6, 2009 at 7:17 AM, MeinDummy <MeinDummy@...> wrote: Hi, I propose to delete the phrase 'Do not add relationships to pending releases from Discogs. You never know if they get accepted.' from http://musicbrainz.org/doc/Discogs_Relationship_Type Doc: DiscogsRelationshipType and from http://wiki.musicbrainz.org/Discogs_Relationship_Type Wiki: DiscogsRelationshipType . The RFC was posted on July 22nd and no-one objected: http://lists.musicbrainz.org/pipermail/musicbrainz-style/2009-July/008150.html [mb-style] RFC: DiscogsRelationshipType and pending Discogs releases Related discussions are here: http://lists.musicbrainz.org/pipermail/musicbrainz-style/2009-July/008105.html [mb-style] DiscogsRelationshipType and pending Discogs releases http://lists.musicbrainz.org/pipermail/musicbrainz-users/2008-July/018209.html [mb-users] DiscogsRelationshipType and pending Discogs releases Christian (MD) -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/RFV%3A-DiscogsRelationshipType-and-pending-Discogs-releases-tp24844551p24844551.html Sent from the Musicbrainz - Style mailing list archive at Nabble.com. _______________________________________________ Musicbrainz-style mailing list Musicbrainz-style@... http://lists.musicbrainz.org/mailman/listinfo/musicbrainz-style _______________________________________________ Musicbrainz-style mailing list Musicbrainz-style@... http://lists.musicbrainz.org/mailman/listinfo/musicbrainz-style
	Re: RFV: DiscogsRelationshipType and pending Discogs releases by Brian Schweitzer :: Rate this Message: Reply to Author \| View Threaded \| Show Only this Message Given that more than the required amount of time has passed, with no objections, I'd say this RFV has passed. :) Brian _______________________________________________ Musicbrainz-style mailing list Musicbrainz-style@... http://lists.musicbrainz.org/mailman/listinfo/musicbrainz-style
	Re: RFV: DiscogsRelationshipType and pending Discogs releases by MeinDummy :: Rate this Message: Reply to Author \| View Threaded \| Show Only this Message Hi Brian, it's already changed in the docs. I asked voiceinsideyou (my random pick among the transclusion editors) if there was anything else to do and he didn't say so. Or should I have notified the voters at least? Christian -------- Original-Nachricht -------- > Datum: Wed, 26 Aug 2009 16:01:04 -0400 > Von: Brian Schweitzer <brian.brianschweitzer@...> > An: MusicBrainz style discussion <musicbrainz-style@...> > Betreff: Re: [mb-style] RFV: DiscogsRelationshipType and pending Discogs releases > Given that more than the required amount of time has passed, with no > objections, I'd say this RFV has passed. :) > > Brian -- Jetzt kostenlos herunterladen: Internet Explorer 8 und Mozilla Firefox 3 - sicherer, schneller und einfacher! http://portal.gmx.net/de/go/chbrowser _______________________________________________ Musicbrainz-style mailing list Musicbrainz-style@... http://lists.musicbrainz.org/mailman/listinfo/musicbrainz-style
	Re: RFV: DiscogsRelationshipType and pending Discogs releases by Chad Wilson-2 :: Rate this Message: Reply to Author \| View Threaded \| Show Only this Message Ahh yes, sorry - I thought you were just asking with respect to the transclusion/wiki rather than the process. Normally as a matter of convention the implementor sends an email to the list once a proposal is passed and implemented, and closes any open Trac tickets associated. Think we're done here now. A wider issue is that the RelationshipType pages probably need to be added to the 'official' transclusion index, akin to the exercise Brian and I went through with the *Style pages recently. I'll open a task for myself for this. Cheers Chad / voiceinsideyou On 27-Aug-2009, at 5:06 PM, "Christian Rotsch" <MeinDummy@...> wrote: > Hi Brian, > > it's already changed in the docs. > I asked voiceinsideyou (my random pick among the transclusion > editors) if there was anything else to do and he didn't say so. Or > should I have notified the voters at least? > > Christian > > > -------- Original-Nachricht -------- >> Datum: Wed, 26 Aug 2009 16:01:04 -0400 >> Von: Brian Schweitzer <brian.brianschweitzer@...> >> An: MusicBrainz style discussion <musicbrainz-style@... >> > >> Betreff: Re: [mb-style] RFV: DiscogsRelationshipType and pending >> Discogs releases > >> Given that more than the required amount of time has passed, with no >> objections, I'd say this RFV has passed. :) >> >> Brian > > -- > Jetzt kostenlos herunterladen: Internet Explorer 8 und Mozilla > Firefox 3 - > sicherer, schneller und einfacher! http://portal.gmx.net/de/go/chbrowser > > _______________________________________________ > Musicbrainz-style mailing list > Musicbrainz-style@... > http://lists.musicbrainz.org/mailman/listinfo/musicbrainz-style _______________________________________________ Musicbrainz-style mailing list Musicbrainz-style@... http://lists.musicbrainz.org/mailman/listinfo/musicbrainz-style