Radeon (xf86-video-ati) verdict

View: New views
4 Messages — Rating Filter:   Alert me  

Radeon (xf86-video-ati) verdict

by David C. Rankin :: Rate this Message:

Reply to Author | View Threaded | Show Only this Message

After working with the ati driver instead of the radeonhd driver, I must say I am very impressed with the KMS implementation. It works much, much better than in the past (performance is still way short of fglrx, and it is still much HOTTER than fglrx , but screen artifacts are virtually eliminated, desktop effects are good, and compiz works very well with the driver.

Helluva job Arch team!


--
David C. Rankin, J.D.,P.E.
Rankin Law Firm, PLLC
510 Ochiltree Street
Nacogdoches, Texas 75961
Telephone: (936) 715-9333
Facsimile: (936) 715-9339
www.rankinlawfirm.com

Re: Radeon (xf86-video-ati) verdict

by Ng Oon-Ee :: Rate this Message:

Reply to Author | View Threaded | Show Only this Message

On Thu, 2009-11-05 at 01:55 -0600, David C. Rankin wrote:
> After working with the ati driver instead of the radeonhd driver, I must say I am very impressed with the KMS implementation. It works much, much better than in the past (performance is still way short of fglrx, and it is still much HOTTER than fglrx , but screen artifacts are virtually eliminated, desktop effects are good, and compiz works very well with the driver.
>
> Helluva job Arch team!
>
>

Uhh... credit where credit is due, and the ati driver isn't
written/maintained by the Arch dev team =)


Re: Radeon (xf86-video-ati) verdict

by Jan de Groot :: Rate this Message:

Reply to Author | View Threaded | Show Only this Message

On Thu, 2009-11-05 at 16:19 +0800, Ng Oon-Ee wrote:
> On Thu, 2009-11-05 at 01:55 -0600, David C. Rankin wrote:
> > After working with the ati driver instead of the radeonhd driver, I must say I am very impressed with the KMS implementation. It works much, much better than in the past (performance is still way short of fglrx, and it is still much HOTTER than fglrx , but screen artifacts are virtually eliminated, desktop effects are good, and compiz works very well with the driver.
> >
> > Helluva job Arch team!
> >
> >
>
> Uhh... credit where credit is due, and the ati driver isn't
> written/maintained by the Arch dev team =)

We just took the right git snapshot that works on his system ;)


Re: Radeon (xf86-video-ati) verdict

by Ng Oon-Ee :: Rate this Message:

Reply to Author | View Threaded | Show Only this Message

On Thu, 2009-11-05 at 09:22 +0100, Jan de Groot wrote:

> On Thu, 2009-11-05 at 16:19 +0800, Ng Oon-Ee wrote:
> > On Thu, 2009-11-05 at 01:55 -0600, David C. Rankin wrote:
> > > After working with the ati driver instead of the radeonhd driver, I must say I am very impressed with the KMS implementation. It works much, much better than in the past (performance is still way short of fglrx, and it is still much HOTTER than fglrx , but screen artifacts are virtually eliminated, desktop effects are good, and compiz works very well with the driver.
> > >
> > > Helluva job Arch team!
> > >
> > >
> >
> > Uhh... credit where credit is due, and the ati driver isn't
> > written/maintained by the Arch dev team =)
>
> We just took the right git snapshot that works on his system ;)
>
Ah, how could I have overlooked that.

Helluva job JGC and co! =)