Re: "Pill" spams

On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 7:08 AM, Bowie Bailey <Bowie_Bailey@...> wrote:
> That sounds like it might be good rule-fodder.  "subject", "Subject",
> and "SUBJECT" are possibly valid, but the other funky capitalizations
> might be worth a few points.


And how would one write a rule for that?  It's not a header rule that
matches the content of the Subject header line, but the initial
"SubjeCT" itself.  And how to do the proper regex match?

Any other ideas on these pill spams?  What are they scoring for anyone else?