Andrew Black wrote:
> I think I've got a couple corrections on that list.
>
> One is that you may need to use the os name windows-2008 rather than
> win_2008_0-em64t. I've updated fetch_records.pl in perforce, but I'm
> not certain if the changes automatically propagate or not when the fetch
> is performed. If the changes aren't automatically propagated, we'll
> likely need to figure out how to transition the push updates to my user
> account.
>
> The second correction is that the testing coverage on windows-2008
> includes MSVC 8.0.
Like this?
--- genxviews (revision 785832)
+++ genxviews (working copy)
@@ -590,14 +590,18 @@
# Windows ##############################################################
-process_results "Windows 2008" "EM64T" "MSVC 9.0" \
- "win_2008-0-em64t-msvc-9.0-*-*-log.gz.txt" \
- win_2008_0-em64t-msvc-9.0.html
+process_results "Windows 2008" "X64" "MSVC 9.0" \
+ "windows-2008-msvc-9.0-*-*-log.gz.txt" \
+ windows-2008-msvc-9.0.html
-process_results "Windows 2008" "EM64T" "Intel C++ 11.0" \
- "win_2008-0-em64t-icl-11.0-*-*-log.gz.txt" \
- win_2008_0-em64t-icl-11.0.html
+process_results "Windows 2008" "X64" "MSVC 8.0" \
+ "windows-2008-msvc-8.0-*-*-log.gz.txt" \
+ windows-2008-msvc-8.0.html
+process_results "Windows 2008" "X64" "Intel C++ 11.0" \
+ "windows-2008-icl-11.0-*-*-log.gz.txt" \
+ windows-2008-icl-11.0.html
+
process_results "Windows Vista" "EM64T" "MSVC 9.0" \
"win_vista-0-em64t-msvc-9.0-*-*-log.gz.txt" \
win_vista_0-em64t-msvc-9.0.html
>
> --Andrew Black
>
> Martin Sebor wrote:
>> Thanks for the heads up! I updated the genxviews script to reflect
>> your changes on the result pages (see the commit below). Hopefully
>> I got the system abbrevs right. I don't think the Solaris changes
>> need any updates to the script.
>>
>>
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&revision=785832>>
>> Martin
>>
>> Andrew Black wrote:
>>> Greetings all.
>>>
>>> The schedule used for the nightly testing of stdcxx builds on the build
>>> servers at RogueWave has gotten a little out of date, so I ended up
>>> taking some time today to bring it into alignment with the current state
>>> of the build servers. This resulted in the following changes being
>>> made. Note that I'm using the host name vocabulary used internally by
>>> RogueWave for these notes, rather than those names on the
>>>
http://stdcxx.apache.org/builds/ pages.
>>>
>>> * windows-2003: Remove all requests (hosts repurposed for windows-2008)
>>> * Windows_2000: Remove all requests (host died).
>>> * windows_xp: remove requests for icl-9.1, icl-10.0, msvc-7.1, add
>>> requests for 32-bit icl-11.0.
>>> * windows-xp-em64t: Remove requests for icl-10.0, add requests for
>>> 64-bit icl-11.0.
>>> * windows-vista-em64t: remove requests for icl-10.0, replace with
>>> requrests for icl-11.0.
>>> * windows-2008: Add testing of same requests as windows-vista-em64t on
>>> mason, pane, porthole, and shatter.
>>> * redhat_as-4.0-amd64: Remove, folding into redhat_as-4.0-em64t
>>> * redhat_as-5.0-em64t: Remove compiler/binutils runenvs, requrests for
>>> icc-9.1 and icc-10.0, add requests for icc-11.0
>>> * solaris-9: Update sunpro 5.9 patch level to 5.9j10
>>> * solaris-10-amd64: Ditto.
>>> * solaris-10: Ditto, update sunpro 5.8 patch level to 5.8j17
>>>
>>> One other piece of information of note is that operating system upgrades
>>> have been performed on all solaris, redhat and windows platforms. I
>>> don't have exact patch versions handy, but the script used to push the
>>> results out to apache has not been updated with the new versions.
>>>
>>> --Andrew Black