> it's better but there are still two problems :(
> 1./ the typolink are not good
> 2./ there are not categories titles between <option...> and </option>
Yes, that's a bit tricky part. These 'field' things tells the core, that it
should take value from field, called, i.e. 'category_uid'. These fieldnames
totally depend on extension developer, but you may take a look at DB fields
of the table, you're working with - in 99% of cases fieldnames in TS will be
the same, as fieldnames in db (maybe, some will be missing or some new
added, which, actually, should be reflected in extension documentation).
So, in your case [category-id] would be simple 'uid' (don't put quotes in
TS); [category-title] = 'title' or 'name' (take a look at DB better).