Larry Myers wrote:
> Is there any difference codebase wise between RC3 and the official 1.1
> release?
>
> I've been really happy with all the 1.1 releases, we have ruby code
> running in production at work that runs significantly better with JRuby
> vs. MRI.
>
> It's also really satisfying to tell our Ops people that all we need new
> servers bootstrapped with is the JDK for deploying code. We can just
> drop our JRuby tarball with gems already installed and be up and running
> quickly on production servers.
>
> Thanks for all the hard work on this release!
Great to hear it's working out so well for you. We'd love to hear more
about your app or have you add an article to the wiki on it.
The only two fixes promoted to JRuby 1.1 after RC3 were JRUBY-2315 and
JRUBY-2314.
JRUBY-2314: Buffer management defect in RubyIO library: Class ChannelStream
JRUBY-2315: Kernel#exit does not work from within Thread
The former was a minor behavioral problem that affected IO#read and
IO#readpartial. The latter was causing JRuby to not shut down
"everything" on a Kernel#exit (and it seems we may not have fixed it
entirely, so a better fix will hopefully be in 1.1.1 very soon).
- Charlie
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from this list, please visit:
http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email
