« Return to Thread: [ANN] Literaljson 0.1

Re: [ANN] Literaljson 0.1

by Joni Freeman-2 :: Rate this Message:

Yes, Jackson is faster:
http://github.com/jonifreeman/literaljson/tree/13607aba8dce9769bfcf717319459db18080a887/benchmark

I'm pretty sure there's a few optimizations which could bring
Literaljson closer to Jackson though.

Cheers Joni

On Wed, 2009-07-08 at 16:10 -0300, Daniel Sobral wrote:

> Any benchmark against Jackson?
>
> On Wed, Jul 8, 2009 at 1:39 PM, Joni Freeman <joni.freeman@...>
> wrote:
> JSON toolkit for Scala
> http://github.com/jonifreeman/literaljson/tree/master
>
> Features:
>
> * DSL to create JSON
> * Quite fast parser, 200 times faster than standard Scala JSON
> parser
> according to one benchmark:
> http://github.com/jonifreeman/literaljson/tree/be575a9eda0f2cee75d2665ef48aa4abf601c06d/benchmark
> * Compact formatting
> * Pretty printing
> * XPath like queries
>
> Cheers, Joni
>
>
>
>
>
>
> --
> Daniel C. Sobral
>
> Something I learned in academia: there are three kinds of academic
> reviews: review by name, review by reference and review by value.

« Return to Thread: [ANN] Literaljson 0.1