« Return to Thread: [ANNOUNCE] Apache Shale To Move To the Attic
Re: [ANNOUNCE] Apache Shale To Move To the Attic
by Cyril Bouteille-2
::
Rate this Message:
Hi Greg, what features of Seam do you feel match Shale's VC or Remoting?
I also understand ajax4jsf to be returning only HTML fragments per
architecture. We've a lot of Shale Remoting function returning JSON and
I'm not sure how we would do that in RichFaces...
We do have a couple of outstanding bugs with Shale and unfortunately not
much time to contribute :-( , so folks like me will have to migrate to
some other framework that's still actively maintained.
Greg Reddin wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 28, 2009 at 11:44 AM, Cyril Bouteille <cyril@...> wrote:
>
>> This is sad news! Can you please recommend alternative projects for
>> migration of deployed View-Controller and Remote features? Thanks.
>>
>
> Just my viewpoint: probably your best bet would be to migrate to Seam
> and/or ajax4jsf.
>
> But if you just don't feel like leaving Shale... This doesn't mean the
> code is going to disappear. The code will be housed in the Apache
> Attic svn. I'm not sure about existing releases, but I doubt they will
> be removed from Maven repos, etc. If you feel like the code needs
> further improvement feel free to start it back up at Google Code or
> elsewhere. The only caveat to forking is that ASF still holds the
> Apache Shale trademark so you'd have to come up with a different name.
>
> Thanks,
> Greg
>
I also understand ajax4jsf to be returning only HTML fragments per
architecture. We've a lot of Shale Remoting function returning JSON and
I'm not sure how we would do that in RichFaces...
We do have a couple of outstanding bugs with Shale and unfortunately not
much time to contribute :-( , so folks like me will have to migrate to
some other framework that's still actively maintained.
Greg Reddin wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 28, 2009 at 11:44 AM, Cyril Bouteille <cyril@...> wrote:
>
>> This is sad news! Can you please recommend alternative projects for
>> migration of deployed View-Controller and Remote features? Thanks.
>>
>
> Just my viewpoint: probably your best bet would be to migrate to Seam
> and/or ajax4jsf.
>
> But if you just don't feel like leaving Shale... This doesn't mean the
> code is going to disappear. The code will be housed in the Apache
> Attic svn. I'm not sure about existing releases, but I doubt they will
> be removed from Maven repos, etc. If you feel like the code needs
> further improvement feel free to start it back up at Google Code or
> elsewhere. The only caveat to forking is that ASF still holds the
> Apache Shale trademark so you'd have to come up with a different name.
>
> Thanks,
> Greg
>
smime.p7s (4K) « Return to Thread: [ANNOUNCE] Apache Shale To Move To the Attic
| Free embeddable forum powered by Nabble | Forum Help |
