Am 27.03.2012 10:36 schrieb Corinna Vinschen:
> Needless to say that the ultimately most efficient way would be
> to find a method to avoid rebase problems after fork at all. The
> last attempt at it looked promising at first, but then again...
>
http://social.msdn.microsoft.com/Forums/en-US/windowsgeneraldevelopmentissues/thread/afdf1b68-1f3e-47f5-94cf-51e397afe073You'd think all the statements about interoperability after the EU
anti-trust cases would apply to Cygwin as well.
If SUA can, Cygwin should as well: "Microsoft shall ensure that
third-party software products can interoperate with Microsoft’s Relevant
Software Products using the same Interoperability Information on an equal
footing as other Microsoft Software Products. (“Interoperability
Commitment”)".
http://www.microsoft.com/Presspass/press/2009/dec09/12-16Statement.mspxConveniently, nothing except a press contact is given on that page.
--
Problem reports:
http://cygwin.com/problems.htmlFAQ:
http://cygwin.com/faq/Documentation:
http://cygwin.com/docs.htmlUnsubscribe info:
http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
