On Tue, Sep 15, 2009 at 1:35 AM, Paul Gregory
<
pgregory@...> wrote:
> - Log -----------------------------------------------------------------
> commit 4789c5e16868665ab294352eddbe343705e0653d
> Author: Paul Gregory <
pgregory@...>
> Date: Mon Sep 14 16:33:41 2009 +0100
>
> Change the fix for #2847147.
>
> * As pointed out by Chris Foster, checking the options each pixel
> is too costly. However I didn't like the idea of passing a futher
> flag into a function that otherwise has the sampling mechanims
> abstracted. Instead I decided to extend the sample interface to
> support the type of random shuffling needed by the dof indices.
I read through this code, and I think it's an excellent idea; much cleaner
than my original solution :)
~Chris.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Let Crystal Reports handle the reporting - Free Crystal Reports 2008 30-Day
trial. Simplify your report design, integration and deployment - and focus on
what you do best, core application coding. Discover what's new with
Crystal Reports now.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/bobj-july_______________________________________________
Aqsis-development mailing list
Aqsis-development@...
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/aqsis-development
