Re: [Bug 328908] Bring back the resize grippy

[Reinout van Schouwen]

(Replying to gnome-bugsquad mailing list)

Op woensdag 05-08-2009 om 09:36 uur [tijdzone +0000], schreef evince
(bugzilla.gnome.org):

> If you have any questions why you received this email, please see the text at
> the end of this email. Replies to this email are NOT read, please see the text
> at the end of this email. You can add comments to this bug at:
>   http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=328908
>
>   evince | general | Ver: 2.26.x
>
> Emmanuel Fleury changed:
>
>            What    |Removed                     |Added
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>              Status|UNCONFIRMED                 |NEW
>      Ever Confirmed|0                           |1
>
>
>
>
> ------- Comment #13 from Emmanuel Fleury  2009-08-05 09:36 UTC -------
> (In reply to comment #12)
>
> Sorry for that, but then, marking it as confirmed ('NEW') would help. :)

It's not very usual to bypass the module maintainer and confirm one's
own bugs, is it?

regards,

--
Reinout van Schouwen

_______________________________________________
Gnome-bugsquad mailing list
Gnome-bugsquad@...
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-bugsquad

[Andre Klapper]

Am Mittwoch, den 05.08.2009, 12:10 +0200 schrieb Reinout van Schouwen:
> It's not very usual to bypass the module maintainer and confirm one's
> own bugs, is it?

If it's not totally clear stuff (like an obvious typo) I'd say that
confirming one's own bugs should be avoided.
But I admit that I rarely do it too.

andre
--
 mailto:ak-47@... | failed
 http://www.iomc.de/  | http://blogs.gnome.org/aklapper

_______________________________________________
Gnome-bugsquad mailing list
Gnome-bugsquad@...
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-bugsquad

[C de-Avillez-2]

On Wed, 2009-08-05 at 12:10 +0200, Reinout van Schouwen wrote:

> (Replying to gnome-bugsquad mailing list)
>
> Op woensdag 05-08-2009 om 09:36 uur [tijdzone +0000], schreef evince
> (bugzilla.gnome.org):
> > If you have any questions why you received this email, please see the text at
> > the end of this email. Replies to this email are NOT read, please see the text
> > at the end of this email. You can add comments to this bug at:
> >   http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=328908
> >
> >   evince | general | Ver: 2.26.x
> >
> > Emmanuel Fleury changed:
> >
> >            What    |Removed                     |Added
> > ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >              Status|UNCONFIRMED                 |NEW
> >      Ever Confirmed|0                           |1
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > ------- Comment #13 from Emmanuel Fleury  2009-08-05 09:36 UTC -------
> > (In reply to comment #12)
> >
> > Sorry for that, but then, marking it as confirmed ('NEW') would help. :)
>
> It's not very usual to bypass the module maintainer and confirm one's
> own bugs, is it?
>
> regards,
>

Looking at the bug, and the last updates that brought this up... it
seems to me that Emmanuel followed the instructions we currently have on
http://live.gnome.org/Bugsquad/TriageGuide/StockResponses.

Of course, our conclusion at the meeting was to be more lenient, and
give the folks in the bug a time to respond before closing. So, I guess
this serves as an example of why time should be given (not that we in
the meeting did not know ;-).

On the other hand, yes, if this is a valid bug, then versions should be
updated, and the bug should not have been kept in UNCONFIRMED.

On yet another hand, this has never been really enforced, so -- I guess
-- it is indeed time to do it.

..C..


_______________________________________________
Gnome-bugsquad mailing list
Gnome-bugsquad@...
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-bugsquad